Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of DBSTalk by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

3D HD


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   quack05

quack05

    Cool Member

  • Registered
  • 23 posts
Joined: Nov 26, 2008

Posted 22 July 2010 - 01:36 PM

Just wondering why 3D HD is free and when Dtv first came out with HD I had to pay extra for it, and still pay for it though I got the free 24 months. So why are they not charging for the 3D channels they carry?

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   Hutchinshouse

Hutchinshouse

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,632 posts
Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Posted 22 July 2010 - 01:39 PM

Just wondering why 3D HD is free and when Dtv first came out with HD I had to pay extra for it, and still pay for it though I got the free 24 months. So why are they not charging for the 3D channels they carry?


No demand for it. If 3D blossoms, so will the fees.

#3 OFFLINE   uwhumpty

uwhumpty

    Legend

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 146 posts
  • LocationSioux City, IA
Joined: Oct 22, 2007

Posted 22 July 2010 - 03:21 PM

Here's my 2 cents, and you can take it for what it's worth.

Demand for 3D is very low right now, and from the looks of it, it will take a while to gain popularity (just look at some of the threads in this forum). I personally have a 3D tv, and I like it, and DirecTV's picture is pretty good. But, there is also very little content available. With low popularity and minimal content, charging for what they do have available would drive/keep customers away from the technology. Again, I like the 3D stuff, but if I had to pay for it, even just a few dollars, I probably wouldn't, just because there isn't much there to pay for.

On the other hand, HD was highly anticipated, and still is today. We all got spoiled with the initial Festivus in 2007, and have been craving more ever since. This can also be seen by looking at the various threads on this forum. I, and many others I assume, have the mindset that, once you see HD, you don't want SD anymore, and DirecTV knows this. With 3D, I find it fun to watch for certain things, but I could certainly live without it.

I understand that there was a charge for HD when it initially launched, even with the handful of channels, but at least those channels had new content day after day. The current 3D offerings are very limited in the amount of content that they show. If 3D ever takes off, I'm assuming there would be a charge, but I know I personally would not pay $10 a month, and I'm sure DirecTV knows this too.
Slimline SL3-SWM
HR34-700 via HDMI --> Onkyo HT-RC260 --> Samsung PN50C8000 3D Plasma
HR24-200 via HDMI --> Samsung LN32D550
H24-700 via HDMI --> Samsung UN32EH5300
H25-700 via HDMI --> Samsung UN40ES6100
Receivers networked via DECA. DECA cloud networked to a Linksys E4200.
Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Verizon, Stock ICS 4.2.2)
Asus Nexus 7 (Stock Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
Asus Transformer Infinity (Stock ICS 4.2.1)

#4 OFFLINE   matt

matt

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,858 posts
Joined: Jan 11, 2010

Posted 22 July 2010 - 03:29 PM

SHH! Don't give them any ideas....


I don't have a 3D TV but isn't there only a handful of channels?
Slimline 5 with SWM-16
Wireless DECA
HR34-700!
R22-200 Leased
Owned H25-700 and H24-700 off and packed for the move.

DIRECTV subscriber since Nov. 2009

#5 OFFLINE   RAD

RAD

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 15,785 posts
  • LocationDripping Springs, TX
Joined: Aug 05, 2002

Posted 22 July 2010 - 03:35 PM

Just wondering why 3D HD is free and when Dtv first came out with HD I had to pay extra for it, and still pay for it though I got the free 24 months. So why are they not charging for the 3D channels they carry?


IIRC, when I got my 1st HD set back in January 2001 there was no extra charge for HD channels (there was only 2 or 3 then).

Right now I'm guessing that Panasonic is footing part of the costs for 103 (n3D), 104 is the PPV's and 106 ESPN3D is only active when there's a program, like the part time RSN's. So probably this isn't costing them much at all at the moment.

There's also the chance that DirecTV might pull in some new customers that got a new 3D set and are not happy that Dish or their local cable company doesn't have any 3D channels, so DirecTV could be looking at this as a loss leader at the moment.

See post My Setup for configuration info.


#6 OFFLINE   skatingrocker17

skatingrocker17

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 270 posts
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Posted 22 July 2010 - 04:44 PM

I don't think they should charge extra but they probably will. 3d is broadcast in HD and HD is supposedly free. Maybe it will fall under the category of the HD Extra pack.




spam firewall