Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Should Directv give you 2 boxes with no mirroring or rent fees?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   JoeTheDragon

JoeTheDragon

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,211 posts
Joined: Jul 21, 2008

Posted 26 August 2010 - 10:37 PM

Should Directv give you 2 boxes with no mirroring or rent fees for box 2?

Most cable co's only give one and this something that can make them stand out.
I want CLTV / CLTV HD on direct tv.

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   bills976

bills976

    Godfather/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 506 posts
Joined: Jun 30, 2002

Posted 26 August 2010 - 10:57 PM

Interesting idea, but they make too much cash on the mirroring fee. I doubt we will see this go away anytime soon.
Living Room: HR20-700 connected to a 52" Sony KDL-52Z5100
OTA: Radio Shack 15-2187 diplexed over SWM with Channel Master diplexers
Dish: CalAmp Slimline w/ WNC SWMline LNB
Spare receiver gathering dust: Phillips DSR-704

#3 OFFLINE   HerntDawg

HerntDawg

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 242 posts
  • LocationOregon
Joined: Oct 06, 2008

Posted 27 August 2010 - 04:06 AM

Without a poll I say yes!!

Mirroring/Lease fee is crap.

#4 OFFLINE   nevea2be

nevea2be

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 172 posts
Joined: Sep 04, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 04:52 AM

What is the mirroring fee?

#5 OFFLINE   dpeters11

dpeters11

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 12,919 posts
  • LocationCincinnati
Joined: May 30, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 05:21 AM

Interesting idea, but they make too much cash on the mirroring fee. I doubt we will see this go away anytime soon.


They also probably made a lot of money on the HD Access fee.

#6 OFFLINE   dpeters11

dpeters11

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 12,919 posts
  • LocationCincinnati
Joined: May 30, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 05:22 AM

What is the mirroring fee?


It's the same as the lease fee, but charged to owned boxes.

#7 OFFLINE   fluffybear

fluffybear

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 7,171 posts
  • LocationPeachtree City, GA.
Joined: Jun 19, 2004

Posted 27 August 2010 - 05:25 AM

What is the mirroring fee?


It should appear on your bill as a "Leasing Fee". In short, this is the fee $5.99 per receiver) DirecTV charges you to have programming on an additional receiver.

My answer is YES, do away with mirror/leasing fee's on a second receiver. DirecTV could go as far as to have a # of free receivers in a given package.

Choice gets 1 free (no different than today)
Choice Xtra gets 2
Choice Ultimate gets 3
Premier gets 4

This type of system (in my opinion) would encourage customers to look at going with a better package or possibly invest in additional receivers.

Proud DirecTV customer since July, 1994

My Q3 2014 Set-Up


#8 OFFLINE   Dazed & Confused

Dazed & Confused

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 273 posts
Joined: Jun 13, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 05:36 AM

Kind of irrelevent at this point. The fee is firmly entrenched as part of the cash flow equation, so if it goes away as a lease/mirror fee it will just pop up somewhere else.

Perhaps removing it could draw enough additional customers to offset the revenue loss, but I doubt it. "Free Lease/Mirroring Fee for life" just isn't a sexy come on like "Free HD for life".:lol:
_____________________________________________
Sony KDL-40V2500 / HR20-100
Sony KDS-55A2020 / HR22-100

#9 OFFLINE   CTJon

CTJon

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 274 posts
Joined: Feb 05, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 06:45 AM

They'd just charge more money elsewhere. My suspicion is that DirecTV would like to go to the Uverse model with only 1 DVR and non-dvr slaves that access the recorded program. This would replace the mirror fee with multi-room viewing few. Technically this is a terrible idea and the limits caused by a single dvr and many - but another discussion.
As much as we see fees come and go we will pay more and more for service.

#10 OFFLINE   txtommy

txtommy

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 802 posts
Joined: Dec 30, 2006

Posted 27 August 2010 - 07:05 AM

I know a number of people with only one TV. Having a free mirroring fee on a second receiver would be of little interest to them. It might, however, convince them to accept a second receiver at no cost even which would be of no benefit to Directv.
“People ask me what I do in the winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.” -- Rogers Hornsby

#11 OFFLINE   JACKIEGAGA

JACKIEGAGA

    N.Y. FOOTBALL GIANTS

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 5,206 posts
Joined: Dec 11, 2006

Posted 27 August 2010 - 07:16 AM

They also probably made a lot of money on the HD Access fee.


This should be removed especially now. DirecTv is not the only company pushing HD

JACK,
 
 


#12 OFFLINE   boba

boba

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,580 posts
Joined: May 23, 2003

Posted 27 August 2010 - 07:25 AM

Why are stupid irrelevant questions allowed? We can't change Directv policy so all this will do is take up forum space.

#13 OFFLINE   JoeTheDragon

JoeTheDragon

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 4,211 posts
Joined: Jul 21, 2008

Posted 27 August 2010 - 07:38 AM

Interesting idea, but they make too much cash on the mirroring fee. I doubt we will see this go away anytime soon.


I not saying drop the fees all together just make box 1 and 2 have no rent or mirroring fee.
I want CLTV / CLTV HD on direct tv.

#14 OFFLINE   dishrich

dishrich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,541 posts
Joined: Apr 22, 2002

Posted 27 August 2010 - 08:13 AM

It should appear on your bill as a "Leasing Fee". In short, this is the fee $5.99 per receiver)


You must be the ONLY one being charged $5.99 - EVERYONE else is charged $5... :confused: :confused:

#15 OFFLINE   Carl Spock

Carl Spock

    Superfly

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 4,567 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2004

Posted 27 August 2010 - 08:28 AM

Of course they should give us two receivers for free.

They should also only hire athletic twenty-something girls dressed in blue bikinis to do their installs.
hangin' with the bros at 40 Eridani A

#16 OFFLINE   Dave DFW

Dave DFW

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 58 posts
Joined: Jun 11, 2008

Posted 27 August 2010 - 08:33 AM

I think allowing an extra receiver with a higher programming package might interest many people. D* has had this so long that their policy is unlikely to change.

#17 OFFLINE   trainman

trainman

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,464 posts
  • LocationSherman Oaks, CA
Joined: Jan 09, 2008

Posted 27 August 2010 - 08:55 AM

They should also only hire athletic twenty-something girls dressed in blue bikinis to do their installs.


Yeah, but they'd always get stuck at their first install of the day. "Can you show me how to work the remote again?"
trainman is Jim Ellwanger

HR34-700 | Linksys WGA-600N | Samsung 46" LCD | Slimline-5 dish

#18 OFFLINE   Kansas Zephyr

Kansas Zephyr

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,489 posts
Joined: Jun 29, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 09:27 AM

Why are stupid irrelevant questions allowed? We can't change Directv policy so all this will do is take up forum space.

Really?

Don't think that the potential to influence D* policy, by starting discussions here, exists?

Hmmm...HD free for 24-months for current subs. Only after I saw threads complaining about "dissing current customers" here, did it become available.

I also saw numerous threads about being forced to have SuperFan for HD, in past seasons. Now, it's included.

Did THIS forum force those changes? Of course we don't know...but I'm sure it didn't hurt.

BTW...Glad to see you're a DBSTalk Club Member that helps pay for forum space. :rolleyes:

...and yes, perhaps as an incentive, they could consider waiving one or two more lease/mirror fees as part of a premium/sports bundle, etc.

Edited by Kansas Zephyr, 27 August 2010 - 11:36 AM.

5 LNB Slimline & SWM-16
SWM1 2 HR20s & HR21 via SWS-4 "green label" 4-way splitter w/power pass one leg for PI - SWM2 2 HR20s & HR21 after SWS-4 "green label" 4-way splitter
2 HR20-700 Wireless network for DoD
HR20-700 eSATA Vantec NexStar CX w/ 2TB WD20EVDS
HR21-100/AM21 Wireless network for DoD
HR21-100/AM21
With diplexed OTA via an "out" on one SWS-4 4-way splitter, using a Winegard YA 1713 - Channel Master 4228 - Channel Master 7777 in the attic.
Yes, my market has HD LiLs...and I'm still not giving up OTA! No rain-fade, and all sub-channels 24/7/365.
Also, with diplexed Cox Internet on one leg, downstream of a SWS-4 4-way splitter, using a SWS-2 2-way splitter, as a combiner.
R10 via SWM-16 Legacy 1
In boxes HR10-250, HDVR2 & (2) D10-300

#19 OFFLINE   skatingrocker17

skatingrocker17

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 270 posts
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Posted 27 August 2010 - 09:28 AM

It should appear on your bill as a "Leasing Fee". In short, this is the fee $5.99 per receiver) DirecTV charges you to have programming on an additional receiver.

My answer is YES, do away with mirror/leasing fee's on a second receiver. DirecTV could go as far as to have a # of free receivers in a given package.

Choice gets 1 free (no different than today)
Choice Xtra gets 2
Choice Ultimate gets 3
Premier gets 4

This type of system (in my opinion) would encourage customers to look at going with a better package or possibly invest in additional receivers.


I never even thought of that, it's actually a really good idea and makes sense.

#20 OFFLINE   Getteau

Getteau

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 810 posts
  • LocationHouston
Joined: Dec 19, 2007

Posted 27 August 2010 - 10:02 AM

When I briefly left DTV in 2001, I told the CSR on the phone that I was leaving because of the mirror/lease fees. I also told her I would be willing to pay a little more upfront for a receiver if I could get rid of those fees. So I think it would be great if they got rid of it; especially when I'm paying for an additional 5 receivers. I have 2 additional rooms that could use TV's, but I haven't added them there because it's not worth the extra $10 a month.

I also think they would also add a fair number of cable subscribers if they took this approach. I’m sure for some people it’s hard to justify going to DTV when they realize they have to drop 5 for every room they are currently getting for free with their analog cable.

Edited by Getteau, 27 August 2010 - 06:55 PM.

Thanks,
Rich

HR44-500 - HDMI to Panasonic TC-50S1 50" Plasma
HR24-100 - HDMI to Panasonic TC-50S1 50" Plasma
HR23-700 - HDMI to Insignia 42" Plasma
HR22-100 - HDMI to LG 32" LCD
HR21-700 - WD 1T Green Power drive - HDMI to Toshiba 65HM167 65" rear projection

R22-200 - Component to Insignia 42" Plasma
R15 - svideo to Toshiba 32" tube tv





Protected By... spam firewall...And...