Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

2011 DISH HD


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
167 replies to this topic

#26 OFFLINE   Paul Secic

Paul Secic

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,222 posts
Joined: Dec 16, 2003

Posted 28 December 2010 - 12:53 PM

I'd like to see

Africa Channel HD
GSN HD
FOX Movie Channel HD
TV ONE HD
HUB HD

Enjoying AT 250 HBO, 

 

Equipment: VIP 722 reciever


...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#27 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 41,395 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 28 December 2010 - 01:34 PM

James, any idea what & when new sats are planned after the new one at 77 mid year? After filling in the CWHDs and PBSHDs I'd guess Charlie would work on 24/7 HD RSNs. If he could improve that situation it would cut into Dtv's boasting powers. Also I may be hallucinating but I thought I read that MLB network on DISH would be at least a number of years away for some reason, possibly tied to MLB Extra Innings??? Thanks James.

I believe the next replacement (after 77) is going to 61.5 to replace Rainbow 1/Echostar 12 and provide more local markets. I don't see any new ConUS bandwidth opening up (especially on Western Arc) which is what is needed for 24/7 RSN and more national HD.

#28 OFFLINE   rocatman

rocatman

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 815 posts
Joined: Nov 27, 2003

Posted 28 December 2010 - 03:31 PM

James, any idea what & when new sats are planned after the new one at 77 mid year? After filling in the CWHDs and PBSHDs I'd guess Charlie would work on 24/7 HD RSNs. If he could improve that situation it would cut into Dtv's boasting powers. Also I may be hallucinating but I thought I read that MLB network on DISH would be at least a number of years away for some reason, possibly tied to MLB Extra Innings??? Thanks James.


To clarify, QuetzSat-1 is schedued to launch sometime between August and November 2011. Its use in the U.S. should be almost exclusively spotbeams for locals because of its proximity to the 82 W Canadian DBS slot. The next satellite launch for Dish is the E-16 satelllite in 2012 going to 61.5 W and it is expected to also to be primarily a spotbeam satellite for locals. For the Eastern Arc, Dish's CONUS expansion will be at 72.7 W as it gains use of more of the TPs there as DirecTV moves locals off that slot. I believe Dish should be gaining use of 8 or 9 more TPs there in the next year or so. Dish has also filed applications with the FCC to move both E-4 and E-8 (after QuetzSat-1 is launched) to the 86.5 W slot. Although both these satelllites would be using CONUS TPs at 86.5 W, their beams would be directed away from the Canadian border because of possible interference with the 82 W aand 91 W Canadian DBS slots. This means that they could only be used for locals. For the Western Arc, there is nothing on the books for launches there in the next couple years although DBS Expansion Band satellites could be under development for Eastern and Western slots. Dish Western Arc expansion is tied to the conversion to 8PSK and probably MPEG-4. This will gain Dish a large amount of bandwidth both CONUS and spotbeam but will require the swapout of a large number of older receivers.

#29 OFFLINE   prm1177

prm1177

    Cool Member

  • Registered
  • 18 posts
Joined: Aug 21, 2007

Posted 28 December 2010 - 07:15 PM

I'd have to say that PBS locals in HD would fill my holiday stocking nicely.

#30 OFFLINE   Jim5506

Jim5506

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,555 posts
Joined: Jun 07, 2004

Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:40 PM

WE have too many HD channels now.

What we need is fewer channels with higher quality of programming, not pseudo HD crap advertized as HD or even the real HD crap advertized as worthwhile programming.
Tuners: Hopper 2000; Hopper w/Sling; 3 Joeys; Samsung SIR-T351; Accurian 6000;2 X HD TiVo; 2 X TiVo Series 2 Stand alone; Panasonic Showstopper 2000
Dish 1000.2 @ 110, 119, 129; dish 500 @ 61.5
Antennas - CM4228; RS U75-R; coathanger; Funke PSP.1922 (stillin the box); paperclip
Displays: Sony VPH D50Q with HD Fury HDMI input; Hitachi 57F59; Sony Bravia LCD;Sanyo 32" LCD; Panasonic 42" plasma
Sony 80GB PS3; Toshiba HD-DVD

Give me a Finco colinear array and I'll rule the world - HA-HA-HA-HA!

#31 OFFLINE   tkrandall

tkrandall

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,795 posts
Joined: Oct 03, 2003

Posted 29 December 2010 - 09:00 PM

To clarify, QuetzSat-1 is schedued to launch sometime between August and November 2011. Its use in the U.S. should be almost exclusively spotbeams for locals because of its proximity to the 82 W Canadian DBS slot.

.........

Dish has also filed applications with the FCC to move both E-4 and E-8 (after QuetzSat-1 is launched) to the 86.5 W slot. Although both these satelllites would be using CONUS TPs at 86.5 W, their beams would be directed away from the Canadian border because of possible interference with the 82 W aand 91 W Canadian DBS slots.


If DISH can today operate at 77w with conus beams and not interfere over the U.S. with either itself or DirecTV at 72.5/72.7, or Canada at 82, then why would it be a problem for them to operate conus beams at 86.5? I had gotten the impression that the "old" requirement of 9 degrees Ku separation had been dismissed as overkill and 4.5 was becoming accepted. Not so?

Edited by tkrandall, 30 December 2010 - 07:33 AM.


#32 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 41,395 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 29 December 2010 - 09:19 PM

If DISH can today operate at 77w with conus beams and not interfere over the U.S. with either itself or DirecTV at 72.5/72.7, or Canada at 82, then why would it be a problem for them to operate conus beams at 86.5?

The US seems to have accepted 4.5 separation but Canada has not. The current use of 77 is southern US only (not ConUS) or Mexico only, avoiding Canada (basic coverage seen here). DirecTV is leaving 72.7 leaving DISH to only interfere with itself between 77 and 72.7. If DISH keeps the spotbeams to the southern US 77 shouldn't bother the Canadians at all.

I had gotten the impression that the "old" requirement of 9 degrees Ku separation had been dismissed as overkill and 4.5 was becoming accepted. Not so?

Not fully accepted ... the problem is with multiple location dishes not designed for 4.5 degree separation. DirecTV's use of 72.5 is fine as they use a single satellite location dish. It can look at a couple of degree circle and not see 77. On Western Arc trying to span two or three satellites on an existing dish without seeing new satellites placed between the desired satellites is harder. Current aiming of a multi-location dish requires compromises to be made to get all locations (without adjustable position LNBs). While new dishes could be designed to pick up or reject the "tweeners" the plan would have to be worked to avoid interference on the old dishes that will remain in use for many years.

#33 OFFLINE   tkrandall

tkrandall

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,795 posts
Joined: Oct 03, 2003

Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:08 AM

Is there something unique about the 1000.4 dish that allows for mitigating any potential 72.7/77 Ku same-transponder interference versus other Ku dishes?

I know it has more precise aiming requirements, sort of like does a DirecTV slimline, but then of course the slimlines are working to peak the more alignment-sensitive Ka band with sats less than 4 degrees apart.

#34 OFFLINE   levibluewa

levibluewa

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 615 posts
  • LocationWA, OR, CA
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:21 AM

(basic coverage seen here).


James,

Red line - does that indicate primary coverage zone with standard size dish? and what significance is the yellow shaded area? Thanks

#35 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 41,395 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 30 December 2010 - 11:11 AM

Is there something unique about the 1000.4 dish that allows for mitigating any potential 72.7/77 Ku same-transponder interference versus other Ku dishes?

The LNB locations are designed with the shorter spacing in mind. DISH isn't trying to skip a tweener on that dish ... they have placed the third LNB in a place where it can pick up a closer spaced orbital location.

Red line - does that indicate primary coverage zone with standard size dish? and what significance is the yellow shaded area? Thanks

It is roughly that way. The yellow area is 10dB lower than the blue ... the red line is 2dB higher than the red. Actual reception would vary depending on local conditions. That coverage would only exist if the earth were a perfect sphere with no trees or difference in ground level (no hills/valleys/etc.).

It is intended as a rough reference ... not an accurate "you will get it/you won't get it" map.

#36 OFFLINE   inazsully

inazsully

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 781 posts
Joined: Oct 03, 2006

Posted 30 December 2010 - 11:34 AM

This has turned into a very technical discussion that has no relation to the original post. James, you should know better.

#37 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 41,395 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 30 December 2010 - 11:39 AM

This has turned into a very technical discussion that has no relation to the original post. James, you should know better.

A little drift? Better in a thread than the satellites drifting. It is all part of the big picture ... people want more HD, but where's the room? It is not there on the current satellites.

#38 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 20,430 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 30 December 2010 - 11:51 AM

This is meant to be an HD "anticipation" thread. Without at least a cursory understanding of whether or not there is any bandwidth to carry any new HD... there isn't much reason to anticipate.

-- !rotaredoM mA eM

What I do when I'm not here


#39 OFFLINE   GrumpyBear

GrumpyBear

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,233 posts
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:18 PM

This is meant to be an HD "anticipation" thread. Without at least a cursory understanding of whether or not there is any bandwidth to carry any new HD... there isn't much reason to anticipate.

I hope for full time RSN's, IFC, and FoxMo. I am pretty content right now, but those would really put me over the top.

#40 OFFLINE   hoophead

hoophead

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 336 posts
Joined: Feb 10, 2008

Posted 30 December 2010 - 08:16 PM

I hope for full time RSN's, IFC, and FoxMo. I am pretty content right now, but those would really put me over the top.

With no anticipation, or expectations, I would really like to see in no particular order: RSN's, ESPNU, IFC. If I had to choose one it would be the RSN's - man, am I overly tired of searching all over the place to find my local games :(

#41 OFFLINE   Dish97

Dish97

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 99 posts
Joined: Dec 19, 2009

Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:06 PM

[quote name='James Long']A little drift? Better in a thread than the satellites drifting.

:lol::lol::lol:

#42 OFFLINE   bluegras

bluegras

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 444 posts
Joined: Jan 31, 2008

Posted 31 December 2010 - 08:13 AM

how about adding RFDTV in HD to our lineup.Please contact them to get this channel added any help would be very appreciated.

http://www.rfdtv.com...-HD/rfd-hd.html

Thanks

Bluegras

#43 OFFLINE   purtman

purtman

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,950 posts
Joined: Sep 19, 2006

Posted 31 December 2010 - 09:20 AM

I'd like to see NASA, ESPNU, the return of the Disney Channels, our local PBS (though the OTA works great), RFD, and the Military Channel. I heard NASA was supposed to be HD but I'm not aware if it is. Also, I'm not sure if the Military Channel is in HD. I think that would be pretty good. Also, lots more RSNs and even adding the MLB Network. However, I think the latter might be hard because of Dish's missed oppportunity ot get in when it had a chance.

#44 OFFLINE   tampa8

tampa8

    Godfather/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 1,888 posts
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

Posted 31 December 2010 - 04:11 PM

Have to say Dish has done quite well adding HD. For me really only three that I really would like to see. IFC leads the list, EspnU, and RFD. I have nothing to base it on, but I have a gut feeling they are going to add RFD HD.

#45 OFFLINE   bluegras

bluegras

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 444 posts
Joined: Jan 31, 2008

Posted 31 December 2010 - 04:36 PM

yea i hope that add it i would like to see the cumberland highlanders show in HD.

Thanks

Bluegras

#46 OFFLINE   levibluewa

levibluewa

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 615 posts
  • LocationWA, OR, CA
Joined: Aug 13, 2005

Posted 31 December 2010 - 06:20 PM

1 more vote for IFCHD, and the Superstations.

#47 OFFLINE   GrumpyBear

GrumpyBear

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,233 posts
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Posted 01 January 2011 - 02:06 PM

1 more vote for IFCHD, and the Superstations.


Superstations, NOW thats a good idea. I would vote for them.

#48 OFFLINE   tampa8

tampa8

    Godfather/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 1,888 posts
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

Posted 01 January 2011 - 08:19 PM

Forgot about the superstations..... ya them too:D

#49 OFFLINE   studdad

studdad

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 654 posts
Joined: Aug 11, 2008

Posted 01 January 2011 - 09:46 PM

I expect more of an emphasis on locals ... filling out HD locals markets (including local CW HD and local PBS HD carriage). That is where DISH has the room (capacity) to improve (or will by midyear when Quezsat-1 is launched to 77 for locals).

But I'm willing to be surprised ... expect nothing, accept more, be happy.

I hope so, i.e. CW HD. I am looking hard at switching from D* to Dish, and the only advantage D* has for me is the CW HD Channel in my local Market (Spokane, WA). Bring that to me, and the switch will be a no brainer.

#50 OFFLINE   motorcycledave1000

motorcycledave1000

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 7 posts
Joined: May 04, 2009

Posted 03 January 2011 - 01:19 PM

Superstations, NOW thats a good idea. I would vote for them.


Don't forget the Encore channels (Mystery, Western, etc.) me want-ie.

But yeah IFC, PBS and Super Stations.

Is there such a thing as Sundance-HD? That would be nice too.




Protected By... spam firewall...And...