Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

FCC votes for retransmission rulemaking


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,519 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 12 March 2011 - 11:30 AM

How about make it simple? If you can receive (or should be able to if not for blocking terrain or objects) it with a mid-range antenna at 35' AGL, satellite can carry it regardless of the transmitter city or DMA.
Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#22 OFFLINE   RasputinAXP

RasputinAXP

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,135 posts
Joined: Jan 23, 2008

Posted 12 March 2011 - 12:07 PM

Oh, dear. I figured out how to make an RSS feed for comments on 10-71.

http://fjallfoss.fcc...minDate=3/12/10

"Belligerent and numerous."

Sometimes I update the Dish Network FAQ

AT200, Hopper & 360 via HDMI to Onkyo 505 to basement 42" Westy, Hopper via Comp-over-Cat5 to living room 42" Vizio with a Roku 3, Joey to Toshiba 32" LCD with a Logitech Revue. You want fries with that? Pull up to the 2nd window.


#23 OFFLINE   kenglish

kenglish

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSalt Lake City, Utah, USA
Joined: Oct 02, 2004

Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:42 AM

How about make it simple? If you can receive (or should be able to if not for blocking terrain or objects) it with a mid-range antenna at 35' AGL, satellite can carry it regardless of the transmitter city or DMA.


Does that include tropo?::D


#24 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,279 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:45 AM

How about make it simple? If you can receive (or should be able to if not for blocking terrain or objects) it with a mid-range antenna at 35' AGL, satellite can carry it regardless of the transmitter city or DMA.

Does that include tropo?::D


Just use the service contour the station claims and call it a day.

#25 OFFLINE   kenglish

kenglish

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSalt Lake City, Utah, USA
Joined: Oct 02, 2004

Posted 14 March 2011 - 12:29 PM

Just use the service contour the station claims and call it a day.


Sounds reasonable to me.

#26 OFFLINE   dishdude19

dishdude19

    Cool Member

  • Registered
  • 11 posts
Joined: Dec 08, 2003

Posted 06 April 2011 - 06:14 AM

Originally posted by James Long:

"If you're really looking for the locally produced content from another market and not trying to watch network content that should be available on a local affiliate or regionally restricted content such as pro sports you are in a distinct minority.

The technical challenge of being able to deliver thousands of local affiliates to anywhere in the country via satellite is not met by the demand. Perhaps streamed on demand via the Internet (with territorial restrictions intact) would work. But there is simply no need for customers to have to have a dish that can receive ~4000 channels just to please a few who want a foreign market.[/QUOTE]

From Dishdude19:
I know this is a highly-charged topic, and I don't want to offend anyone, especially James whom I'm quoting, and I mean the following with the upmost respect to all . . . but here's my opinion.

I don't think anyone is suggesting making 4000 channels available, but why would anyone be against choice for the consumers? Why not make it mandatory to receive local stations and give subscribers the choice to buy an additional market (even adjacent DMA) for extra cost? I think this is a good plan.

Those who want to have two markets may be a "minority," but minorities should still have a choice to view the way they wish; it's not hurting anyone if they choose to buy an extra DMA if the law is amended. Further, if it's only a "minority," then why are local stations so threatened by this "minority?" I have worked for several television stations during my professional career. DId I want people to watch my stations? ABSOLUTELY! ! ! But I wanted them to watch by choice, not because we were the only option forced upon them by law as their only choice. I've never agreed with that, even as a broadcaster, and I know, James, this makes me in the minority.

#27 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,279 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 06 April 2011 - 06:36 AM

The post I replied to was in respect to seeing Buffalo locals in Tulsa ... those are not adjacent markets. I believe the posts after it cover my opinion that a station should be available via satellite anywhere that their OTA signal is expected to reach (protected FCC service contour). That would include any overlap with another station of the same network ... they compete over the air, they shouldn't mind competing via satellite (and cable).

Channels from the next market over where the station doesn't provide coverage would have to be worked out in the affiliate contracts. Some overlap is expected but competing against a neighboring DMA on a full market basis isn't just translating the OTA marketplace to satellite.

There would still be some technical limits. Spotbeams that barely cover a market would not always cover an entire neighboring market.

#28 OFFLINE   spikor

spikor

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 54 posts
Joined: Aug 11, 2008

Posted 06 April 2011 - 11:20 AM

I have not read everything listed above on page 1 and 2 but will this allow a choice in locals? O.K here is what I am getting at my Locals are Huntington-Charleston W.Va. I never had and never will like/liked those channels ( and I have my reasons why but I will not get into that ) BUT IF I do not want these as my Locals can I choose Neighboring Cincinnati Ohio ( We were at one time but this was changed Years ago ) as my Locals or Lexington Ky. as my Locals. At one time I was allowed 2 Locals and I had Cincinnati and Lexington as my Locals maybe this was a Glitch in their system....BUT I never Questioned it. I would LOVE 2 Locals again IF allowed. BUT would settle for one IF I had a Choice in Choosing one besides Huntington-Charleston W.Va
This is my take from this. Am I understanding it right or am totally wrong?
I hope they would allow 2 again in the future but would be O.K If they allow a Choice besides what I will be set up with.

#29 OFFLINE   sniller

sniller

    Cool Member

  • Registered
  • 17 posts
Joined: Apr 08, 2011

Posted 08 April 2011 - 07:31 PM

I think it would be great to watch any Over the Air signal I want to watch in the country. I want to live in San Fransisco and get New York Locals and Portland locals. I hope they change the exclusivity law its a violation of freedom of the press.

#30 OFFLINE   Terry K

Terry K

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 231 posts
Joined: Sep 13, 2006

Posted 10 April 2011 - 09:15 PM

The only thing left in my personal preference is what to do with short markets ... and the current distants laws could be modified to cover that. I would restore the protection for out of market stations (since the station itself would be carried).


NO NO NO

NEVER give protection to short market stations, like KQTV in St Joseph which provides LOUSY product. If I was in St Joseph, I would be able to get currently all the majors except KMBC (ABC) and instead be forced to watch KQTV (again, a LOUSY excuse for a broadcaster) and they keep KMBC off a dish. KMBC gets higher ratings overall than KQTV does (and local cable is allowed to carry KMBC by virtue of its viewed status.

KQTV should have to compete for my viewership, and by virtue of the lcoal cable bandit carrying it, DBS should be allowed to as well.




spam firewall