Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Dish Needs to Get Moving on 3D


  • Please log in to reply
615 replies to this topic

Poll: What is your current interest in 3D? (154 member(s) have cast votes)

What is your current interest in 3D?

  1. I own a 3DTV and am anxious for more 3D content (37 votes [23.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.87%

  2. I don't yet own a 3DTV but am planning to buy within the next 6 months (5 votes [3.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.23%

  3. I own a 3DTV but am not really interested in 3D content (18 votes [11.61%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.61%

  4. I don't own a 3DTV and am not planning on investing in 3D in the near future (95 votes [61.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 61.29%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#501 OFFLINE   Orion9

Orion9

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 201 posts
Joined: Jan 31, 2011

Posted 23 June 2013 - 10:07 AM

The simple answer is that they see a future in 3D. Perhaps they are wrong. But they still see some reason to invest the money needed to have 3D in their sets.


I wouldn't say it is so much of "a future" in the way most consumers see it (as in I'll be using 3D for years and wondering why I ever bothered with that old 2D stuff) but rather, they can get enough money out if it over some period of time to recoup their investment plus a good/decent profit margin. This can be true if there is "a future" or if it is just a fad or a check-off item that people will pay enough for over whatever time it lasts.

The CE field is very competitive and the usual model is to build the best product that you can this year, then ignore it and build whatever you think is the best product next year... repeat. Whether 3D takes off at a consumer level or not, by the time this is known, the TV makers will be introducing some other new thing to differentiate themselves from the boring old commodity-priced stuff that everyone already has.

Edited by Orion9, 23 June 2013 - 10:08 AM.


...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#502 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,612 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 23 June 2013 - 11:15 AM

Based on the votes above so far, about 76% show no interest in 3D.


Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#503 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,909 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 23 June 2013 - 11:16 AM

The next thing seems to be interactive TV ... "apps" built in to the set so you don't need separate hardware. Adding technology developed for video games to allow people to control their TVs with hand motions. Cool stuff ... probably just as cool as 3D technology. Whether it is useful or a gimmick will be decided as time goes by.

Glasses free technology with a wider range of seating angles and distances will help as 3D improves over the next few years.

3D will still suffer from the "single camera viewpoint" that all TV is based on. It will never be just like being there live. In some ways TV is be better than being there (one cannot transport themselves around an event in a split second as easy as a director can switch to a different camera) but the viewer does not control the camera.

The concept of 3D ... showing the same scene from the viewpoint of each eye to each eye ... works good for static shots. Keep your head perfectly still and let the camera and screen do the work. But the natural action of a human is to move their head. In real life a few inches of motion changes the scene much more than the difference between the two eyes presented in a 3D film. To make 3D more realistic one must be able to present more than two images (one for each eye). One must allow for head motion and have additional images present to let people interact more with the picture.

It is that lack of realism that is holding 3D back.


That being said, people are looking for more than HD in their TV. Consumers are buying 3D movie tickets. Supporting home viewing of what is available in the marketplace isn't a bad thing.
Welcome to DBS Talk - Let's talk about DBS! (The Digital Bit Stream)
DISH Network vs DirecTV: HD Channel List - DISH Network HD Capacity, HD Conversion and more.
DISH Network complete channel lists and lists by satellite location are in The Uplink Activity Center.
Unless otherwise noted, I speak for myself. Content is not controlled by DISH Network, DirecTV or any other company.

#504 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,612 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 23 June 2013 - 11:20 AM

It is that lack of realism that is holding 3D back.

Until they move holographics from ScFi to a practical function, 3D cannot be realistic.  I would imagine that some form of holographic projection system in in the works in some lab somewhere by now.  And I don't mean the gimmicky versions we've seen in some gadget shops.


Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#505 OFFLINE   harsh

harsh

    Beware the Attack Basset

  • Registered
  • 18,985 posts
  • LocationSalem, OR
Joined: Jun 14, 2003

Posted 23 June 2013 - 11:49 AM

So 3D is something considered a standard feature of a top of the line HDTV? Not bad for a technology that is being portrayed as useless.

More that the high-end 2D features of a TV are all there to best facilitate 3D (higher scan rates, better video processing).

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. -- JFK


#506 OFFLINE   356B

356B

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 900 posts
  • LocationNorthern California
Joined: Oct 11, 2008

Posted 23 June 2013 - 11:59 AM

Based on the votes above so far, about 76% show no interest in 3D.

 

I'd venture to say "based on votes above so far" is not representative of the consuming public. To each their own.....


Thank you and
Best of luck

#507 OFFLINE   GrumpyBear

GrumpyBear

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,233 posts
Joined: Feb 01, 2006

Posted 23 June 2013 - 12:48 PM

With ESPN 3D coming to an end soon, I think the public has spoken pretty clearly that in home 3D isn't something consumers are really interested in.  

Most high end TV's do have 3d built in to them, that's really because all TV makers buy from the same source and then modify the screen to them.  3D is just in its latest Fad state, and will disappear again.  Between the needed glasses and how the colors are so muted with 3D, it just wont be taking off.  Resolve the necessary glasses issue and make the colors as vibrant, then 3D will be a worthwhile feature.



#508 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,705 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 23 June 2013 - 03:15 PM

This really isn't about any of our individual love or "hate" or apathy for 3D...  but channels for 3D seem to be fading or going away entirely....  box-office 3D movies don't seem to be raking in money because of 3D, but rather in spite of it now... by which I mean, people are going to see movies... not necessarily 3D movies...

 

The "shine" has worn off on this iteration... and outside of the casual interest... there simple are not enough die-hards to support this as a big roll-out for any kind of "standard" right now...  Who knows what role the down economy plays in all of this as well.

 

But love it or hate it... or like me, indifferent to it...  it seems the window is closing on this round of 3D...  maybe in another 20 years we will see another cycle.


-- Respect the S.H.I.E.L.D.


#509 OFFLINE   davejacobson

davejacobson

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 219 posts
Joined: Mar 14, 2005

Posted 24 June 2013 - 02:56 PM

I think there are alot of us that can say I told you that 3D would fail.The majority of the buying public will not spend extra $$$ or wear those silly glasses to watch TV.A good HD picture is really all most of the general public wants myself included.


A good serviceman is not expensive or free. He is priceless

#510 OFFLINE   djlong

djlong

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,212 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire
Joined: Jul 08, 2002

Posted 25 June 2013 - 04:57 AM

It occurred to me that 3D has been like the cicada bug.  Hiberates for a number of years, comes out and makes a lot of noise, then returns to hibernating for years.


  • tsmacro likes this

#511 OFFLINE   Wilf

Wilf

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 235 posts
Joined: Oct 15, 2008

Posted 25 June 2013 - 06:37 AM

It occurred to me that 3D has been like the cicada bug.  Hiberates for a number of years, comes out and makes a lot of noise, then returns to hibernating for years.

I am in my eighties, and I can vouch that indeed that is the case.



#512 OFFLINE   tsmacro

tsmacro

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,197 posts
  • LocationEast Central Indiana
Joined: Apr 28, 2005

Posted 25 June 2013 - 12:06 PM

Based on the votes above so far, about 76% show no interest in 3D.

And that's on a message board where you'd expect there to be more people pre-disposed to wanting the latest viewing experience, so I'd imagine for the general public that number is probably even higher.




"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair." - Douglas Adams

"Who would rule a nation when he could have easier work, such as carrying water uphill in a sieve?" - Robert Jordan


#513 OFFLINE   Chihuahua

Chihuahua

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 180 posts
Joined: Sep 08, 2007

Posted 25 June 2013 - 03:25 PM

I doubt that 3D TV will really catch on quite some time to come.



#514 ONLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Fortuna! Fameux des Halles

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 12,650 posts
  • LocationWinters, California
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 25 June 2013 - 04:17 PM

I doubt that 3D TV will really catch on quite some time to come.

 

For many, but not all, values of "really", "catch on", and "quite some time"!


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#515 OFFLINE   Reaper

Reaper

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 521 posts
Joined: Jul 30, 2008

Posted 25 June 2013 - 04:40 PM

Whether 3D takes off at a consumer level or not, by the time this is known, the TV makers will be introducing some other new thing to differentiate themselves from the boring old commodity-priced stuff that everyone already has.

 

I think this has been the greatest thing about new technologies like in-TV apps and 3D TV emerging; the commodity-priced standard stuff has gotten pretty inexpensive.

 

I went to buy a TV for my bedroom about a year ago and did not want apps or 3D (I have a Roku and an Apple TV, and don't care about in-home 3D). I was able to get a really nice 46" JVC LCD TV for just $500. I was pretty happy about that. :joy:



#516 OFFLINE   Rduce

Rduce

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 316 posts
Joined: May 15, 2008

Posted 26 June 2013 - 09:03 PM

I'd venture to say "based on votes above so far" is not representative of the consuming public. To each their own.....

Actually, I would say that it is a fairly good representation of how viewers around the country and the world feel about home 3D. This past spring the BBC announced that after a two year test they have concluded that viewers were less and less enthusiastic about 3D programming as less and less viewers were watching the 3D programming they were offering. 
 
HBO tech guru Bob Zitter told the TV Connect conference in London that he believes 3D TV is dead. “We (HBO) never thought that 3D with glasses was ever going to get off the ground,” he said. “Consumers have shown they do not want to wear glasses in the home. 3D with glasses is dead.”
 
Then with Samsung’s announcement that “Considering our current technology, Samsung can make glasses-free 3DTV at the R&D level. However, it can only be viewed from a few viewing spots. To make naturally viewed glasses-free 3D TV, for instance in a living room where several people can watch TV from various angles, the technology needs to deliver 3D to at least 32 viewing spots,” the company said in a statement.
“We believe that creating a prototype for lab-grade glasses-free 3D TV, broadcasting system and display will take about five years. For mass commercialization to become possible, manufacturing costs must come down and TV broadcasters will have to upgrade infrastructure, which includes securing transmission bandwidth. Attempts to put glasses-free 3D TV to market within the next 10 years will be difficult.”
 
So, I think that for here and now home 3D with glasses is as it always has been, a gimmick and will slowly fade away just like it did 30 years ago and 30 years before that. 


#517 OFFLINE   356B

356B

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 900 posts
  • LocationNorthern California
Joined: Oct 11, 2008

Posted 26 June 2013 - 11:15 PM

Fascinating how much energy is put into a negative.........3D movie schedule making is beefy for 13 and 14.....somebody obviously is watching. Then again the execs at Fox, Sony, Universal and DREAMWORKS could be idiots........right......


Thank you and
Best of luck

#518 OFFLINE   BillJ

BillJ

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 830 posts
Joined: May 05, 2005

Posted 27 June 2013 - 06:12 AM

This humorous video from Bloomberg sums up the death of 3D TV nicely.

 

http://www.bloomberg...pCpZk6tVTA.html



#519 OFFLINE   djlong

djlong

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,212 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire
Joined: Jul 08, 2002

Posted 27 June 2013 - 06:36 AM

There's a difference between watching at a theater - an event where you're leaving the house - and watching at home where you're making FAR less of a "commitment".



#520 OFFLINE   356B

356B

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 900 posts
  • LocationNorthern California
Joined: Oct 11, 2008

Posted 27 June 2013 - 08:01 AM

There's a difference between watching at a theater - an event where you're leaving the house - and watching at home where you're making FAR less of a "commitment".

Depends......on how into commitments one is.......to each their own.


Thank you and
Best of luck




Protected By... spam firewall...And...