Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Lakers New Regional TV Network - NOW ON THE AIR


  • Please log in to reply
2096 replies to this topic

#361 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,596 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 24 September 2012 - 01:24 PM

This channel is going to hurt DirecTV if they don't have soon after the season starts, far more than the lack of the pac12 channel ever will. However, the two combined will cause the most damage, which is why I think we will see this channel, but may not see the pac12.


I think that all depends on how many other providers add it. Zero so far.
DTV = Digital Television

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#362 OFFLINE   kb24sd

kb24sd

    The Specialist

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 189 posts
Joined: Jun 21, 2012

Posted 24 September 2012 - 01:37 PM

What if you paid $4 billion for something that was invisible?

The Lakers' partnership with Time Warner Cable (let's call it TWC from here on out; we all know I'm not referring to The Weather Channel, right?) that will debut two Lakers-centric regional sports networks -- one in English, one in Spanish -- on Oct. 1 is not just a game-changer. It's an industry changer.

The Lakers' hegemony over the NBA has been a fact of life for their weary competitors for a long time, but their new deal with TWC threatens to cement L.A.'s already prohibitive financial advantage well into the next decade.

The problem for fans in the region is that no one outside of TWC viewers would currently be able to see it.

TWC has two million subscribers in Los Angeles. But another three to four million viewers in the area use one of the region's other cable or satellite providers. And none of them has yet reached a deal with TWC to carry the cable channel. That means those three or four million L.A.-area viewers currently will not see the Lakers kick off their preseason Oct. 7.

TWC Sports President David Rone said by telephone Sunday afternoon that it was "really hard to tell" whether a deal could be reached by the start of the preseason. But Rone said that TWC was "encouraged" by what he termed "deep discussions" with most of the holdout providers.
Time Warner Cable's new 24-hour all-Lakers TV channel will have unfiltered access to the team.

"As much as it matters to me and the Los Angeles Lakers, preseason basketball is a different story than regular-season basketball," Rone said. "It might be that the distributors continue to try and run this out, and it may go beyond October 7. But I feel very confident that by October 30, when the regular season is ready to go, we're going to be in a very good spot."


TWC is paying the Lakers somewhere between $2-$5 billion over the next 20 to 25 years -- there have been different estimates bandied about -- in the new endeavor. Whatever the actual amount is, it will dwarf anything that any other NBA team receives for its games. And that only increases the huge financial edge the Lakers have to acquire and keep players.

Luxury tax, schmuxury tax.

"We don't have a $100 million TV deal," a small-market executive moaned last week. "We can't charge the same for some things like other teams can."

Actually, the Lakers' deal is worth at least 20 times that $100 million.

TWC is convinced the investment will be worth it. With two decades of certainty, TWC will never have to worry about renegotiating a rights fees deal with a third party. There won't be a chance of a dispute like the one between the satellite provider Dish Network and the cable network AMC, which airs the hit shows "Mad Men", "The Walking Dead" and "Breaking Bad", among others; Dish took AMC and other networks off of its programming at the end of June and they haven't been on since.

"The company's goal overall is about the delivery of premium content to our customers in the best way possible. We want them to enjoy the things that they do better and better and better," Rone said. "... And when you look at the Southern California market, sports is so important to the customer base. And when you digress from there, you say, what is important in sports to them?...The Lakers are the crown jewel, by leaps and bounds. Our customers want to be sure that they're never interrupted from enjoying the Lakers in any way. The best way to ensure that was to enter into a partnership with the Lakers."

TWC will also broadcast the WNBA's Sparks, Major League Soccer's Galaxy, and Mountain West Conference football and basketball -- specifically concentrating on teams that fall within the network's satellite footprint, including UNLV, San Diego State and Fresno State. But it's the Lakers carrying the mail on this one.

The two TWC channels not only will have the usual pre- and post-game shows (Access SportsNet: Lakers), but will also have an interactive show featuring social media encounters (#LakeShow), rebroadcasts of both current Lakers games (Encore+, which will add social media commentary and footage not on the original broadcast) and historic Lakers games (Timeless Lakers). There will even be condensed one-hour rebroadcasts of recent games, similar to NFL Sunday Ticket's Short Cuts (Lakers Compacto).

And, of course, there will be the requisite reality show -- a behind-the-scenes look at the selection of this year's Lakers Girls squad. TWC basically has the run of the joint, so it will be the only place you can see things like Dwight Howard putting on a Lakers jersey for the first time.

"It may (not) be a proverbial hotline, but the fact is I have a decade-long relationship with Jeanie (Buss, the Lakers' Executive Vice President of Business Operations) and (Senior VP of Business Operations) Tim Harris," Rone said. "I brought that to bear in establishing the team that we've established here. We have been speaking with them for the last 15 months. We've been with them on a day-to-day basis, interacting with them daily, as you say, and even hourly ... it's not even reactive. It's very, very proactive."

Unique content is critical for TWC. Under the Lakers' old deals, there were, basically, games surrounded by pre- and post-game shows. But TWC has the team's permission to be anywhere it can fit a camera, not only to profile players and coaches, but Lakers' fans -- some of whom tend to be fairly famous.

The Lakers' new network will stretch as far north as Fresno, and go south to the Mexican border in Tijuana. It will also be available in Hawaii, where the Lakers had training camp for many years, and go east to Clark County, Nevada, which encompasses Las Vegas.

But the partnership may as well circle the globe, such is its potential impact.

With this kind of money filling its coffers, Los Angeles is simply in a different universe than any other team, including those also in major media markets like New York and Brooklyn and Chicago, or those who are also making mega-deals for their own RSNs, such as the Celtics did with Comcast SportsNet New England and the Rockets are doing in partnership with Major League Baseball's Astros on Comcast Sports Houston.

The only other team that can claim anything similar to the arrangement the Lakers have with TWC is the Yankees, whose YES Network dominates ratings in New York among sports cable companies.

The Los Angeles Times noted last week that if the Lakers re-sign Howard next summer for the expected five-year max deal -- starting at more than $20 million -- the team's 2013-14 payroll will be more than $100 million for just nine players. If they filled out the final spots on their roster with minimum-salaried guys, the final payroll would be somewhere in the $105 million area.

With the new, more punitive luxury tax penalties taking effect in 2013-14, the Lakers would be facing a huge tax bill. Assuming the tax threshold rises from its current $70.3 million to the league projected $73 million in '13, the Lakers would be around $32 million over the threshold. And the new tax on that $32 million would be an additional $94.5 million. That would make the Lakers' total bill for 2013-14 ...

$199.5 million.

A fifth of a billion dollars. For one team. For one year.

But that's next year. TWC has to deal with the present, and reaching an agreement with the cable or satellite companies -- Comcast, AT&T U-verse, Charter, Cox, Verizon FIOS, DirecTV and Dish Network -- that have L.A. customers. Negotiations with each are ongoing, but the clock is running.

At issue is how much TWC is demanding the cable and satellite providers pay it to carry the Lakers' channels. Such "carriage fees" are a crucial way a cable network makes money. ESPN's ability to leverage its enormous reach and programming into the biggest carriage fees in the industry -- currently $5.15 per subscriber per month, according to the media analyst SNL Kagan -- has helped make the Four-Letter Network a financial behemoth over the last two decades, the TV version of the Lakers, able to crush any challenger and bid on any sports property it wants.

TWC is seeking $3.95 per subscriber per month from the cable companies closest to Los Angeles, with those further away being asked to pay less, for both Lakers channels. Rone said those are increases for the cable and satellite companies, not to consumers, though he allowed such increases can be absorbed by consumers down the line.

"When you look at what other RSNs are charging distributors," he said, "and you look at the terms those networks are carrying, and the ratings and the resonance they have in those communities vis a vis the ratings and the resonance the Lakers and the Galaxy and the Sparks have in this community ... we feel very good about the value of our proposition."

There remains the question of how a network that's partners with the team it's covering will report the not-so-good stories that have been known to pop up from time to time on a professional sports team. Will TWC's broadcasters and analysts criticize players and coaches -- or management -- if they think they deserve criticism?

"We're going to cover everything," Rone said. "There's a level of what's going on that if it's part of the zeitgeist, we're all things Lakers and all things Galaxy, and we're going to cover it. But you know that people come at these things from different bents. And it's fair to say that we come at these things from a partner-oriented bent with these networks."


Link:

http://www.nba.com/2...ls=iref:nbahpt1

#363 OFFLINE   DeathRowsFinest2g

DeathRowsFinest2g

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 45 posts
Joined: Sep 13, 2007

Posted 24 September 2012 - 03:50 PM

Guys i tried reading through the last few pages on the thread. So D* is holding out? I'm about to make that call to TWC and get them to install by this weekend and put D* on hold.

#364 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,596 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 24 September 2012 - 03:59 PM

Guys i tried reading through the last few pages on the thread. So D* is holding out? I'm about to make that call to TWC and get them to install by this weekend and put D* on hold.


TWC owns the channel(s) and hasn't signed any deals with other providers. I wouldn't phrase it as, "holding out."
DTV = Digital Television

#365 OFFLINE   inkahauts

inkahauts

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 15,042 posts
Joined: Nov 13, 2006

Posted 25 September 2012 - 04:42 PM

I good perspective article about Directv and sports...

http://forums.solids...rts-programming

#366 OFFLINE   TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,720 posts
  • LocationPhoenix, AZ
Joined: Oct 01, 2003

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:00 PM

I good perspective article about Directv and sports...

http://forums.solids...rts-programming

As for cost, it's hard to know what's being asked. It could easily be cheaper for DIRECTV to give an IPTV box and an NBA.TV subscription to every fan in Los Angeles rather than pay Time Warner. Or even cheaper, just give them NBA League Pass for free, although this wouldn't give them "home team" commentary.

Won't the games be blacked out in the LA are on those two services?

#367 OFFLINE   maartena

maartena

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,795 posts
Joined: Nov 01, 2010

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:00 PM

Guys i tried reading through the last few pages on the thread. So D* is holding out? I'm about to make that call to TWC and get them to install by this weekend and put D* on hold.


Everyone is holding out. No deal with Charter, U-Verse, FIOS, Dish, Cox, or DirecTV, and those are the main carriers in the Lakers DMA.

Personally, I think we won't see this network before the last week of October. And actually, with the extreme amount of money TWC is asking and the way things have been going with PAC-12, there is a good chance that they will go in to the proper basketball season before they make a deal.

If you NEED the pre-season, your best bet is to make a call to TWC today so you can get a good install time and you can adjust your schedule accordingly. I'm pretty sure NO other providers will have it come start of the pre-season.

The actual proper season.... who knows. There's just as much chance they will get as there is a chance they won't.

Personally, I find $3.95 for the network APPALLING. Yes, the Lakers are by far the most important franchise of California, and the most important of the NBA, but that is quite a steep amount.
[Disclaimer] The definition of "soon" is based solely on DirecTV's interpretation of the word, and all similarities with dictionary definitions of the word "soon" are purely coincidental and should not be interpreted as a time frame that will come to pass within a reasonable amount of time.

I am the Stig.

#368 OFFLINE   FenixTX

FenixTX

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 467 posts
Joined: Nov 11, 2005

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:10 PM

Everyone is holding out. No deal with Charter, U-Verse, FIOS, Dish, Cox, or DirecTV, and those are the main carriers in the Lakers DMA.

Personally, I think we won't see this network before the last week of October. And actually, with the extreme amount of money TWC is asking and the way things have been going with PAC-12, there is a good chance that they will go in to the proper basketball season before they make a deal.

If you NEED the pre-season, your best bet is to make a call to TWC today so you can get a good install time and you can adjust your schedule accordingly. I'm pretty sure NO other providers will have it come start of the pre-season.

The actual proper season.... who knows. There's just as much chance they will get as there is a chance they won't.

Personally, I find $3.95 for the network APPALLING. Yes, the Lakers are by far the most important franchise of California, and the most important of the NBA, but that is quite a steep amount.


I couldn't agree more if the $3.95 per subscriber is correct. That's just outrageous. I feel for Laker fans by saying this but I really hope no provider picks this channel up at that price. Every provider needs to stand up to these networks that want so much per subscriber. Honestly, the only network that does deserve that much is ESPN. Hopefully, an agreement is reached to carry the channel on DirecTV at a substantially lower rate for Laker fans in the Los Angeles area.
Go Big Red!!!

#369 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,968 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:13 PM

Won't the games be blacked out in the LA are on those two services?


That's what I thought;

The home and away telecasts of teams playing against the Lakers on LP will be blacked out in the LA market I think.

TWC SportsNet has the exclusive broadcast rights to the Lakers in this market.

#370 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,968 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:24 PM

I couldn't agree more if the $3.95 per subscriber is correct. That's just outrageous. I feel for Laker fans by saying this but I really hope no provider picks this channel up at that price. Every provider needs to stand up to these networks that want so much per subscriber. Honestly, the only network that does deserve that much is ESPN. Hopefully, an agreement is reached to carry the channel on DirecTV at a substantially lower rate for Laker fans in the Los Angeles area.


To note from the earlier post, TWC Sports President David Rone says its only the subscribers closest to LA (Yeah, lucky us :rolleyes:) they want the $3.95 per month per sub. Less for everyone else in the nation, but how much less was unstated.

...TWC is seeking $3.95 per subscriber per month from the cable companies closest to Los Angeles, with those further away being asked to pay less, for both Lakers channels. Rone said those are increases for the cable and satellite companies, not to consumers, though he allowed such increases can be absorbed by consumers down the line.



#371 OFFLINE   kb24sd

kb24sd

    The Specialist

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 189 posts
Joined: Jun 21, 2012

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:39 PM

Personally, I find $3.95 for the network APPALLING. Yes, the Lakers are by far the most important franchise of California, and the most important of the NBA, but that is quite a steep amount.


Yeah but your ok with D* charging subscribers for Fox Sports San Diego a part time regional channel $5, $4,$3 or whatever ?

Straight blasphemy !

#372 OFFLINE   TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,720 posts
  • LocationPhoenix, AZ
Joined: Oct 01, 2003

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:43 PM

Isn't the $3.95 a month for two channels?

#373 OFFLINE   sigma1914

sigma1914

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 13,915 posts
  • LocationAllen, TX
Joined: Sep 05, 2006

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:49 PM

Yeah but your ok with D* charging subscribers for Fox Sports San Diego a part time regional channel $5, $4,$3 or whatever ?

Straight blasphemy !


I'll bet anything that FS SD is a lot cheaper.
If you stop responding to them or put them on ignore, then eventually they'll go away.

#374 OFFLINE   kb24sd

kb24sd

    The Specialist

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 189 posts
Joined: Jun 21, 2012

Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:49 PM

Isn't the $3.95 a month for two channels?


Nobody knows for sure. But that's what been reported several times in articles.

#375 OFFLINE   VLaslow

VLaslow

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,285 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 25 September 2012 - 07:01 PM

I'm not a basketball fan, so I'm just as happy to be able to turn on KCAL (channel 9) at 8:00pm and see the news without seeing the Lakers. I certainly hope that if DirecTV rents the content it's in a tier for which I don't pay.

#376 OFFLINE   tonyd79

tonyd79

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 12,489 posts
  • LocationColumbia, MD
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Posted 25 September 2012 - 07:42 PM

Yeah but your ok with D* charging subscribers for Fox Sports San Diego a part time regional channel $5, $4,$3 or whatever ?

Straight blasphemy !


Cost to Directv. $4 for an LA market channel versus $3 or $4 for a SD market channel. LA is six times SD. And twice as many games for padres.

Price is not to customer but spread around nation.

So, yeah. Same price for 160 games for a smaller market versus same for a market six times for 70 games. I'm okay with it.

And I'm a lakers fan.
LR: HR34-700, H24-200, Fios DVR, BD350 Blu Ray, Roku Netflix Player, Chromecast, Sony 65w850 TV
BR: HR21-200, Viso 32LX, DB350 Blu Ray
Dish: Slimline, SWM8
Other: genieGo

#377 OFFLINE   maartena

maartena

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,795 posts
Joined: Nov 01, 2010

Posted 25 September 2012 - 11:07 PM

I'm not a basketball fan, so I'm just as happy to be able to turn on KCAL (channel 9) at 8:00pm and see the news without seeing the Lakers. I certainly hope that if DirecTV rents the content it's in a tier for which I don't pay.


I turned on channel 9 today for news and.... the DODGERS were playing! Where's my news! :D
[Disclaimer] The definition of "soon" is based solely on DirecTV's interpretation of the word, and all similarities with dictionary definitions of the word "soon" are purely coincidental and should not be interpreted as a time frame that will come to pass within a reasonable amount of time.

I am the Stig.

#378 OFFLINE   maartena

maartena

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,795 posts
Joined: Nov 01, 2010

Posted 25 September 2012 - 11:08 PM

Yeah but your ok with D* charging subscribers for Fox Sports San Diego a part time regional channel $5, $4,$3 or whatever ?

Straight blasphemy !


I never said I was. I haven't seen a source for that number either, by the way.
[Disclaimer] The definition of "soon" is based solely on DirecTV's interpretation of the word, and all similarities with dictionary definitions of the word "soon" are purely coincidental and should not be interpreted as a time frame that will come to pass within a reasonable amount of time.

I am the Stig.

#379 OFFLINE   kb24sd

kb24sd

    The Specialist

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 189 posts
Joined: Jun 21, 2012

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:04 AM

I never said I was. I haven't seen a source for that number either, by the way.


True but at the same time. It can't be lower than $3 dollars when right now here in San Diego the only TV providers that have it are D* and Cox.

Time Warner, AT&T U-Verse, and Dish don't have it right now.

#380 OFFLINE   Shades228

Shades228

    Hall Of Fame

  • Banned User
  • 5,914 posts
Joined: Mar 18, 2008

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:42 AM

True but at the same time. It can't be lower than $3 dollars when right now here in San Diego the only TV providers that have it are D* and Cox.

Time Warner, AT&T U-Verse, and Dish don't have it right now.


If it makes you feel better to think so.
All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV




spam firewall