Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

I'm Ticked - 3D Olympics For Everyone But Dish Network Subscribers


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Michael1

Michael1

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 132 posts
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Posted 23 July 2012 - 07:13 PM

We are in the middle of a TV milestone. For the first time in history, the Olympics will be broadcast in 3D, 230 hours worth, and Dish Network is nowhere to be found. According to CNet, 80% of households will be able to receive the Olympics in 3D. It seems everyone, but people with Dish Network, will have 3D Olympics.

3D Olympics Channel Available to 80 Percent of Households

If anything should be in 3D, it should be the Olympics.

Michael

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   bt66

bt66

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 5 posts
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Posted 23 July 2012 - 07:56 PM

That was a big mistake I made switching to Dish from DirecTv. I forgot about the Olympics in 3D. Eevn their HD picture quality sucks compared to DirecTv.

#3 ONLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,533 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 23 July 2012 - 08:06 PM

230 hours worth


That's about 229-1/2 hours too much. With all the doping and other scandals, commercialism, pros being allowed to participate, etc. the whole thing is just a farce.
Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#4 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,462 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:45 PM

Since even DirecTV has pulled back from expanding 3D (except for the Olympics)... I'm not sure this is a huge thing.

I do grant you, though, that it seems like Dish ought to have the bandwidth to do an Olympics 3D channel... and while I have ZERO interest in it even if I had a 3DTV... it would be nice for those Dish customers who do.

-- I like to go fast (not really)


#5 OFFLINE   djlong

djlong

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,177 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire
Joined: Jul 08, 2002

Posted 24 July 2012 - 05:25 AM

Until they make glasses-free 3D (and prototypes DO exist but it's not quite mass-market ready for the living room - works ok for laptops) it's just not going to "catch".

[I'll reserve most of my comments on pros being allowed in the Olympics for a sports thread but I *will* say it was high time they were allowed]

#6 OFFLINE   vahighland

vahighland

    Cool Member/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 125 posts
Joined: Mar 29, 2005

Posted 24 July 2012 - 06:23 AM

Yawn. Don't care about 3D or the Olympics.

#7 ONLINE   sigma1914

sigma1914

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 13,849 posts
  • LocationAllen, TX
Joined: Sep 05, 2006

Posted 24 July 2012 - 06:26 AM

Yawn. Don't care about 3D or the Olympics.


Yet, you took time to post about it. :rolleyes:



The Olympics won't change 3D trends, but it's always good to have another event to see for those with 3D.
If you stop responding to them or put them on ignore, then eventually they'll go away.

#8 OFFLINE   hoophead

hoophead

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 332 posts
Joined: Feb 10, 2008

Posted 24 July 2012 - 07:20 PM

80%?
Hmmm
When households with much less owners of those television sets,
AT250 with ViP 722 via HDMI to 47" LG in living room and 27" JVC in exercise room. ViP 722 via HDMI to 42" Panny in master bedroom and 27" Philips in another bedroom

#9 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,365 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 24 July 2012 - 08:27 PM

The latest figures I could find say that 2% of US households have a 3D TV. So over 78% of US homes will get a channel with content delayed to next day and not be able to watch it in 3D. :)

#10 OFFLINE   inazsully

inazsully

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 781 posts
Joined: Oct 03, 2006

Posted 25 July 2012 - 12:02 AM

The latest figures I could find say that 2% of US households have a 3D TV. So over 78% of US homes will get a channel with content delayed to next day and not be able to watch it in 3D. :)


The 2% number may be correct and we know that numbers never lie. I guess it just depends on what numbers you're looking at. For instance, in 2011 21 million 3D LCD TV's were shipped and that doesn't include plasma's. For 2012 the estimate is 50 million (again, only LCD). Q3 of 2011 saw 6.6 million 3D LCD's sold, as in out the door and now in use. Dish is my company of choice and I don't like my company playing second fiddle to anybody. Especially since it looks like the anybody has turned into the everybody. Would you buy a new car if it had a carb instead of fuel injection, or bias ply tires, or no air bags, or just a AM radio?

#11 OFFLINE   olds403

olds403

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 332 posts
Joined: Nov 20, 2007

Posted 25 July 2012 - 04:55 AM

The 2% number may be correct and we know that numbers never lie. I guess it just depends on what numbers you're looking at. For instance, in 2011 21 million 3D LCD TV's were shipped and that doesn't include plasma's. For 2012 the estimate is 50 million (again, only LCD). Q3 of 2011 saw 6.6 million 3D LCD's sold, as in out the door and now in use. Dish is my company of choice and I don't like my company playing second fiddle to anybody. Especially since it looks like the anybody has turned into the everybody. Would you buy a new car if it had a carb instead of fuel injection, or bias ply tires, or no air bags, or just a AM radio?


I would guess that if you dig a little deeper you would find that the majority of those 3D sets were not purchased "specifically" for viewing 3D tv and most likely were purchased as 2D sets that "just happened" to have 3D capability that would never be used. The manufacturers have been shoving 3D down our throats by including it on EVERY mid to upper level TV, that does not mean that all of those tv's will be used to view 3D content.

Also I personally WOULD buy a new car that had a carb, no airbags and an AM radio. My 65 cutlass has all of these and is MUCH more fun to drive than my computerized daily driver.

#12 OFFLINE   Michael1

Michael1

    Legend

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 132 posts
Joined: Feb 24, 2010

Posted 25 July 2012 - 02:21 PM

The manufacturers have been shoving 3D down our throats by including it on EVERY mid to upper level TV, that does not mean that all of those tv's will be used to view 3D content.

Also I personally WOULD buy a new car that had a carb, no airbags and an AM radio. My 65 cutlass has all of these and is MUCH more fun to drive than my computerized daily driver.


You would be the exception on the car with a carb, no airbags and an AM radio...maybe one out of a million.

I don't know how you can conclude the TV manufacturers "have been shoving 3D down our throats" when most of the 3D capable TVs don't even ship with the 3D glasses anymore. It costs virtually nothing to add 3D to a good quality TV, so you are not paying for anytihng.

Also you are not accurate in saying that it is "on EVERY mid to upper level TV". Check out the Sharp LCD TVs.

You weren't one of the people who said HD and DTV was being shoved down our throats, were you? That would be a stretch since most people really wanted it, but actually would have been more accurate.

I guess it is natural for some people to resist change, even it is for the better.

Michael

#13 OFFLINE   olds403

olds403

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 332 posts
Joined: Nov 20, 2007

Posted 25 July 2012 - 03:37 PM

I enjoy HD and my blu-rays but am not going to replace my functioning 4 year old HDTV just for 3D, especially since I have no interest in it. I would sooner invest in 4k TV than 3D tv. It is my belief that 3D is a fad that will pass, just as it has every other time it has surfaced. I have watched 3D movies at the IMAX theater and was not that impressed with them, I have seen new 3D displays at retailers and have not been impressed with them either. If you turn your head it screws with the image. I have no problem with other people getting excited about it but the fact that Dish does not have any 3D channels is not that big a deal to me. For those of you that want Dish to get in on the 3D, as long as it does not cause my rates to increase, good luck.

#14 ONLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,533 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 25 July 2012 - 04:01 PM

You would be the exception on the car with a carb, no airbags and an AM radio...maybe one out of a million.


I'd rather have a car I can work on without a degree in computers. I don't really care about airbags one way or the other and I haven't listened to radio in many years.
Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#15 OFFLINE   domingos35

domingos35

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 536 posts
Joined: Jan 11, 2006

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:01 PM

That was a big mistake I made switching to Dish from DirecTv. I forgot about the Olympics in 3D. Eevn their HD picture quality sucks compared to DirecTv.


just going by your join date i i would bet a couple $ that you are a directv sub planted here just to trash dish ;)

#16 OFFLINE   Jhon69

Jhon69

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,637 posts
Joined: Mar 27, 2006

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:27 PM

That was a big mistake I made switching to Dish from DirecTv. I forgot about the Olympics in 3D. Eevn their HD picture quality sucks compared to DirecTv.



Face it the HD on both sucks,that's why your supposed to watch the Olympics in glorious OTA HD.;):D

Edited by Jhon69, 26 July 2012 - 01:38 PM.


#17 OFFLINE   tampa8

tampa8

    Godfather/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 1,803 posts
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:35 PM

80% is a ridiculous number or you are misconstruing what that means. It could mean 80% of providers have it in 3D, But here are the cold hard facts.

There are about 3% of homes that have 3D capability. That's right only 3%. 45% of them do not watch 3D, they only bought a 3D set because it has features non 3D does not.

http://www.mediapost...l#ixzz21gis5vZE


Now add to that less than 50% of all Dish subs have HD receivers, and of the rest, nowhere near all have a 3D capable receiver.
Of 14 million subscribers, I'm betting no more than 300,000 are even capable of getting it in 3D.

Edited by tampa8, 25 July 2012 - 10:55 PM.


#18 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,365 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 25 July 2012 - 08:56 PM

80% is a ridiculous number. 80% of Americans subscribe to a service where: if they bought special equipment and subscribed to a HD package and were one of the small group of people with a 3D capable set they could watch part of yesterday's Olympic coverage.

#19 OFFLINE   Gloria_Chavez

Gloria_Chavez

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 421 posts
Joined: Aug 11, 2008

Posted 25 July 2012 - 10:06 PM

Recently came across this note from the wsj...

------------------------------
Three Weeks With 3-D TV

Test driving some quality couch-time with the third dimension: Is seeing in stereo mind-blowing, or does it fall flat?

http://online.wsj.co...0137527674.html
------------------------------

My takeaway: Not ready for primetime, especially at the PayTV level, due to compression. Some Blu-Ray content worth watching, but that obviously won't be live.
Since 1995 the average cable bill has increased 122%, while TV consumption per household just 13%.

http://www.multichan...1_Per_Month.php

http://blog.nielsen....-all-time-high/

#20 OFFLINE   jadebox

jadebox

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 404 posts
Joined: Dec 13, 2004

Posted 26 July 2012 - 11:35 AM

Can we drop the off-topic discussion? There's no need to jump into every 3D-related topic to tell us how much you hate it. We've heard it all before and it adds nothing useful to the discussion.

Anyway, I just contacted Dish to express my disappointment at them not including the 3D Olympics coverage. As I understand, it's offered by NBC/Universal as a part of all the other coverage, so it wouldn't cost Dish anything except a little bandwidth to include it.

-- Roger




spam firewall