No; I was born yesterday and am completely self centered and unaware of the possibilites as to how to turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.
Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Posted 19 May 2013 - 09:46 PM
||...Ads Help To Support This Site...||
Posted 20 May 2013 - 04:44 AM
Well at least it's a reminder of what most others already know- there's always a problem with complaints that are based on personal preferences.
Posted 20 May 2013 - 08:54 AM
Others already know? Yes, most are aware if you lose a channel, someone's likely to b and m.
But there seems to be a lot of near duplication, plenty of room to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Posted 20 May 2013 - 11:59 AM
Posted 20 May 2013 - 05:06 PM
XM has some sort of new system they tested awhile back that actually produces some stereo separation and a (perceived) increase in quality. While they were testing it, some of the XM channels were in mono (like Escape and a rock channel which I forget). But now they sound pretty decent in my car. I'm anxiously awaiting their "Free Listening Event" (see my other post) which begins TOMORROW (May 21) so I can dust off my SkyFi 2 and Roady which have been inactive for years and see how the channels sound on my home stereo system.
In any event, I wouldn't pay more than $25 for 6 months for XM anymore. That $15/month "regular price" plus music fee plus tax etc. is ridiculous with all the other choices available nowadays.
3LNB Phase III Dish * 2-R15-300 * R22-200 * D12-100 * DirecTV Subscriber since Y2K