Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Directv CEO Says Possible Merger with Dish "Could Be Pro-Consumer"


  • Please log in to reply
225 replies to this topic

#51 OFFLINE   TXD16

TXD16

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 910 posts
Joined: Oct 29, 2008

Posted 22 September 2012 - 08:24 AM

Much as they now do as individual companies, a post-merger DIRECDish® ;) will have to keep prices at a level that allows them to remain cost-competitive with cable and fiber in (sub)urban areas, and, hence, rural consumers will continue reap the benefits of that competition.

"We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force." - Ayn Rand


...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#52 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,617 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 08:28 AM

Yea he is pumping some short term profits at the expense of customers to drive stock price. It will all come crashing down. A net 52,000 loss of subscribers last quarter and profits are up....so you spend less on sign up promotions this quarter and get a profit. That strategy can work in the short term, but in the long term you cannot ignore this.

Being king of soda pop does not mean you will be king of tv


What exactly has he done at the expense of customers? They've added content, features, and products. They completed 39 retrans deals in 2010, most if not all of 80 in 2011, and the numbers for 2012 will be very high as well.

Edited by Hoosier205, 22 September 2012 - 08:38 AM.

DTV = Digital Television

#53 OFFLINE   wilbur_the_goose

wilbur_the_goose

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,428 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 08:36 AM

My biggest fear is a lesson from the XM/Sirius "merger". XM was MANY times bigger than Sirius, but Sirius' management essentially ended XM forever. There's zero XM left now, and it's a real shame.

Therefore, my fear is that Echostar would rule the merged company - we'd lose our sports, our DVRs - all the stuff we like about D*, and it'd be replaced by a no NFLST, cheapened version of D* with crappy DVRs. But at least we'd get the Water Channel :(

#54 OFFLINE   Araxen

Araxen

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 790 posts
Joined: Dec 17, 2005

Posted 22 September 2012 - 09:15 AM

As a guy who subscribed to XM before Sirius even existed, don't remind me. :nono2:

I'd have to go dig out old credit card statements to get the accurate figures but my memory says my satellite radio costs have more than doubled since I originally subscribed. Maybe they have tripled.

And for essentially the same programming although now I get Howard Stern. I've never liked Howard Stern.


To be somewhat fair Sirius/XM has to negotiate rates with the RIAA and the RIAA raked them over the coals last time. Sirius can't afford to be without music so they had no leverage. They had no choice but to raise rates.

Don't get me wrong I think the merger wasn't that great and I think Sirius/XM quality has suffered because of it.
If it ain't in HD, it ain't worth watching!
PSN: Araxen - Xbox: Gamertag: Araxen II - Steam: Araxen - WiiU: Araxen

#55 OFFLINE   sigma1914

sigma1914

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,406 posts
  • LocationAllen, TX
Joined: Sep 05, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 09:23 AM

Yea he is pumping some short term profits at the expense of customers to drive stock price. It will all come crashing down. A net 52,000 loss of subscribers last quarter and profits are up....so you spend less on sign up promotions this quarter and get a profit. That strategy can work in the short term, but in the long term you cannot ignore this.

Being king of soda pop does not mean you will be king of tv


DirecTV was the only company to have something like 16+ straight quarters with net growth. Every other big provider was losing quarter after quarter...

You've got to get past your personal anger over Pac12 Network and look at the big picture.
If you stop responding to them or put them on ignore, then eventually they'll go away.

#56 OFFLINE   mhking

mhking

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 554 posts
Joined: Oct 27, 2002

Posted 22 September 2012 - 10:08 AM

I lived through the Sirius-XM merger mess and would be first to say that the potential writing is on the wall here, but I would suggest that DirecTV look elsewhere beside Dish for merger bait. Think outside the box -- perhaps a Fios/Uverse element? How about going REALLY radical and merging with someone north of the border -- see if Bell or Rogers would spin off their satellite services into a truly North American service?

I'll admit it's pie in the sky, but radical things come from radical ideas....
Wish list of channels for D*: C-Span 3; Sky News International; CBC Newsworld; France24; EuroNews; Eurosportnews; Setanta Sports News; ABC News 24 (Australia); ABC Asia Pacific; Russia Today; NHK World; DW-TV -- Heck, how about an entire English-language international tier so I don't have to keep switching to my Roku?

#57 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 23,030 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 10:15 AM

Agree.

There would have to be a number of significant technology and infrastructure changes to even make that work.


Something D* doesn't do well.

Rich

#58 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,617 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 10:18 AM

Something D* doesn't do well.

Rich


Really? I'd say just the opposite.
DTV = Digital Television

#59 OFFLINE   TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,929 posts
  • LocationPhoenix, AZ
Joined: Oct 01, 2003

Posted 22 September 2012 - 10:30 AM

DIRECDish® ;)

DirecDishTV ;)

I lived through the Sirius-XM merger mess and would be first to say that the potential writing is on the wall here, but I would suggest that DirecTV look elsewhere beside Dish for merger bait. Think outside the box -- perhaps a Fios/Uverse element? How about going REALLY radical and merging with someone north of the border -- see if Bell or Rogers would spin off their satellite services into a truly North American service?

I'll admit it's pie in the sky, but radical things come from radical ideas....

I was kind of thinking this too, instead of the two satellite providers merging, what would happen if one of the major cable companies bought one of the satellite companys? Then that cable company could be "everywhere".

DirectCastTV? :eek2:

#60 OFFLINE   TBoneit

TBoneit

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,292 posts
Joined: Jul 27, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 12:16 PM

I lived through the Sirius-XM merger mess and would be first to say that the potential writing is on the wall here, but I would suggest that DirecTV look elsewhere beside Dish for merger bait. Think outside the box -- perhaps a Fios/Uverse element? How about going REALLY radical and merging with someone north of the border -- see if Bell or Rogers would spin off their satellite services into a truly North American service?

I'll admit it's pie in the sky, but radical things come from radical ideas....


The Thing is that Dish has been acquiring lots of wireless bandwidth and Blockbuster, that may make them a more attractive merger partner, than just as a satellite TV provider.

Not to mention that adding the dish transponders on 110 & 119 (?) would give DirecTV a whole of of quick bandwidth with a relatively easy to make dish. Then add in the Dish satellites as in orbit spares and ...............

Put all foreign channels on the Dish Eastern Arc and in HD. Right Now I believe Dish is way ahead of DirecTV in foreign language channels. That seems to be a growth market.

Much easier to carry all channels in HD for all markets from one company with more transponders.

To me it looks like a merger could be a good deal.
Remember when your kids were the TV set's remote control?

#61 OFFLINE   Carl Spock

Carl Spock

    Superfly

  • Registered
  • 4,567 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2004

Posted 22 September 2012 - 01:37 PM

DIRECDish® ;)


DirecTV + Dish =

Ditch Divers
Revs Did Itch
Sir Did Vetch

or my favorite

Red Itch Vids
hangin' with the bros at 40 Eridani A

#62 OFFLINE   NR4P

NR4P

    Dad

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 5,771 posts
  • LocationSunny Florida
Joined: Jan 15, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 01:39 PM

You can't compare it to Sirius XM because that was done out of necessity.

While less competition would impact rural people from being able to jump back and forth it would allow them to not have rate increases as high as before because of the negotiating power. Both companies use national pricing so therefor the rural markets wouldn't be "singled" out because they could be.


Agree it was necessary, here's why. It was necessity because of stupid business practives because Sirius offered Howard Stern $.5B (yes Billion) and then XM countered with $.7B for Major League Baseball.

And now there is one and may subs will tell you service did suffer with big rate increases after the 2 year moratorium.

I would argue it did work out for the customer. Without the Sirius-XM merger, likely neither company is around right now. If they are both gone, how does that benefit the consumer?

It's more than just dollars and cents, it's the bigger picture.


Sometimes its OK for the government not to bail out the companies as a reward for stupid business decisions mentioned above. The sats would not have fallen from the sky. Once bankruptcy would have been declared, courts and creditors would have had to deal with the company. They would have emerged as a much leaner more efficient company. This way the creditors get to foot the bill, not the subs.


To be somewhat fair Sirius/XM has to negotiate rates with the RIAA and the RIAA raked them over the coals last time. Sirius can't afford to be without music so they had no leverage. They had no choice but to raise rates.

Don't get me wrong I think the merger wasn't that great and I think Sirius/XM quality has suffered because of it.


Yes Quality has suffered. Many more channels with commercials now. They also made their traffic channels less useful. Before the merger, two cities shared a channel with traffic every 3-4 mins back to back. Now 3 cities share a channel with traffic for your city every 10 minutes. At 65mph one covers alot of roadway in 10 mins making the traffic reports useless.


In general, reduced choice usually hurts consumers.

#63 OFFLINE   Satelliteracer

Satelliteracer

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,042 posts
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:11 PM

Yea he is pumping some short term profits at the expense of customers to drive stock price. It will all come crashing down. A net 52,000 loss of subscribers last quarter and profits are up....so you spend less on sign up promotions this quarter and get a profit. That strategy can work in the short term, but in the long term you cannot ignore this.

Being king of soda pop does not mean you will be king of tv


The loss of customers is because of a planned pullback of going after certain customers. This had been signaled to the street for more than 2 quarters. If D* wanted to have positive numbers in the last quarter, EASILY could have done it by letting customers on the platform and juicing marketing. The issue is that with subscriber acquisition costs as high as they are, it makes no sense to go after some customers that aren't credit worthy.

There is a reason why Warren Buffet and others have bought so much stock in D* in the last year, because it is a well run company. The days of growing, growing, growing subscribers at any costs are over. Don't let the drop in subs fool you, that was planned...there's a reason why D* hit it's all time high in stock price only two weeks ago. They are playing it smart, trying to reign in costs and keeping the customers that make the most sense in the long run.
DIRECTV employee

All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV

#64 OFFLINE   Satelliteracer

Satelliteracer

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,042 posts
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:13 PM

Something D* doesn't do well.

Rich


Directv has already absorbed other technologies over the year, including Prime Star, etc.
DIRECTV employee

All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV

#65 OFFLINE   Satelliteracer

Satelliteracer

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,042 posts
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:14 PM

I lived through the Sirius-XM merger mess and would be first to say that the potential writing is on the wall here, but I would suggest that DirecTV look elsewhere beside Dish for merger bait. Think outside the box -- perhaps a Fios/Uverse element? How about going REALLY radical and merging with someone north of the border -- see if Bell or Rogers would spin off their satellite services into a truly North American service?

I'll admit it's pie in the sky, but radical things come from radical ideas....


Canada....meh....way too many regulations up there including what programming you can offer. The other problem is all the cost to go into a market with only 35 million people, most of them entrenched with another provider.

I would be stunned if D* and Dish haven't looked at Canada and both come to the conclusion that you just can't be profitable up there with the current setup.
DIRECTV employee

All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV

#66 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,617 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:19 PM

Directv has already absorbed other technologies over the year, including Prime Star, etc.


Exactly.

I would also note that Dish's technology advances have, at times, come by the way of stolen patents and alongside hefty lawsuits.
DTV = Digital Television

#67 OFFLINE   zimm7778

zimm7778

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,162 posts
Joined: Nov 11, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:49 PM

My biggest fear is a lesson from the XM/Sirius "merger". XM was MANY times bigger than Sirius, but Sirius' management essentially ended XM forever. There's zero XM left now, and it's a real shame.

Therefore, my fear is that Echostar would rule the merged company - we'd lose our sports, our DVRs - all the stuff we like about D*, and it'd be replaced by a no NFLST, cheapened version of D* with crappy DVRs. But at least we'd get the Water Channel :(


And I and many others would be gone and quick.

#68 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 41,649 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 22 September 2012 - 02:57 PM

- They allowed the Sirius/XM Merger. This is the most compelling evidence that the FCC and other authorities do not mind a merger that creates a 100% monopoly in 1 service type, in this case satellite radio.

There is competition with SiriusXM outside of satellite. Local terrestrial radios still tend to rule the air ... plus there are streaming options via data networks that give people who want to pay an option.

Satellite radio simply is not as big of a deal as pay television. Sure there are ~21 million subscribers to SiriusXM, but many of them did not choose to subscribe (service came with their new cars) and SiriusXM practically gives away subscriptions to people who have cancelled their service.

- They allowed the SBC/AT&T Merger. Not that this directly compares to a Dish/DirecTV merger, but it is an example of how the FCC and other government bodies are becoming a little more lenient in big companies merging in to a huge company. Additionally, of course, AT&T was split up in the 80ties, and this was seen as a first step to bring back the Big Bell.

With a lot more regulation than they had in the 80s. Back in the day Ma Bell controlled their networks and could tell people what they could or could not connect to a phone line. A series of court victories and the breakup of AT&T opened the door to competition that still exists today (even with the merger of the bells). While the ILEC in a community may be a reconstituted AT&T, the CLECs live and can compete with AT&T by reselling AT&Ts own lines at a government regulated cost.

AT&T T-Mobile fell through ... not all mergers will be approved.

In short: The market has significantly shifted in 10 years. There is a lot more chances of a merger happening in CURRENT market conditions than there was 10 years ago.

As long as DirecTV takes the loss when it falls through I don't see the harm in trying. DISH's attempt to buy DirecTV ended with a huge loss ... but it did mark the beginning of never posting a negative year again.

I am surprised to have people at that level talk of a merger. I don't see it as pro-consumer.

#69 OFFLINE   wilbur_the_goose

wilbur_the_goose

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,428 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 05:45 PM

What makes people think D* would be the surviving entity? From where I sit, E* would be chief in charge.

Bigger doesn't usually mean the survivor.

I went through this 2 times in the last 8 years at work. In both cases, the smaller entity ended up ruling the roost (and, IMHO, killing the combined company)

#70 OFFLINE   Hoosier205

Hoosier205

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,617 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 05:48 PM

What makes people think D* would be the surviving entity? From where I sit, E* would be chief in charge.

Bigger doesn't usually mean the survivor.

I went through this 2 times in the last 8 years at work. In both cases, the smaller entity ended up ruling the roost (and, IMHO, killing the combined company)


For me...it's because DirecTV is the only one that deserves to survive. It had better survive.
DTV = Digital Television

#71 OFFLINE   PrinceLH

PrinceLH

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 475 posts
Joined: Feb 18, 2003

Posted 22 September 2012 - 05:56 PM

Agree.

There would have to be a number of significant technology and infrastructure changes to even make that work.

For one, those shared satellite locations, at 119 and 110 would be an increase. Dish also has a Ku band bird at 118.9. So now you've added those transponders. That would be quite a boost and not having to change the LNB to do it!

#72 OFFLINE   john262

john262

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 143 posts
Joined: Oct 26, 2011

Posted 22 September 2012 - 06:23 PM

Why would Directv want to merge with anybody when they're already making record profits? Is there any end to their greed?

#73 OFFLINE   Satelliteracer

Satelliteracer

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,042 posts
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

Posted 22 September 2012 - 06:50 PM

Why would Directv want to merge with anybody when they're already making record profits? Is there any end to their greed?


Directv's profit margin is not that large, very much in line with other companies and industries. 9.84% the last quarter and has been between 7.5% and 10.3% the last three years.

In fact, Directv's profit margin is in the 68th percentile and ranked 1391 out of 4,420 companies. In the CATV systems sector, ranked 11th out of 20.

Apple, is at 25.1%. THOSE GREEDY BASTARDS!! ;)

Yahoo at 18.61%
Google at 22.8%
Oracle 24.86%
AT&T 12.36%
Exxon 12.49%
Disney 16.51%

ETc, etc
DIRECTV employee

All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV

#74 OFFLINE   mnassour

mnassour

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 843 posts
Joined: Apr 23, 2002

Posted 22 September 2012 - 08:32 PM

Folks....I think we all know that any time any CEO says that a merger involving his company will be "good for the consumer" you need to seriously watch your wallet.

What makes people think D* would be the surviving entity? From where I sit, E* would be chief in charge.


Then point the dish straight up and use it as a birdbath. That's the only thing that could make me run screaming back to Time Warner.

Charlie in charge? Pay more for less as he drops channel after channel, screaming about how he's saving us money while charging us the same rates for less programming. My God, how stupid does he think we are?

#75 OFFLINE   coolyman

coolyman

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 102 posts
Joined: Oct 04, 2007

Posted 22 September 2012 - 09:18 PM

Goldman Sachs is not an example of capitalism at work. Corporatism, folks. And what does that have to do with communications anyhow? The customer is only a revenue stream. What benefits the customer is not necessarily beneficial to the business, especially when government is involved. Centralization equally harmful to the consumer and the citizen. Competition in a free market is most beneficial.




Protected By... spam firewall...And...