Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

3TB and 4TB Drives. The Danger!


  • Please log in to reply
192 replies to this topic

#181 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 19,853 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:05 PM

Pardon my butting in on this argument, but what you are showing here is a AF drive in 512e mode...

Tell that to bobcamp1, not to me - I did explain a couple times, but he still insist on his own mistake.

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#182 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,600 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:10 PM

Pardon my butting in on this argument, but what you are showing here is a AF drive in 512e mode. That's fine...this is required for a lots of software (like backup/restore programs) that interact with the drive at a sector level and are not 4K sector aware.

But I am unclear about what that has to do with the original issue of MBR vs. GPT. I guess you could have a MBR drive, using 4k logical and physical sectors exceed the 2.2TB limit, but both your hardware and your OS (and any direct disk accessing software) would have to understand 4K sectors. Boot from a "traditional" disk and add a driver and you can avoid some of the hardware (BIOS) issues, and maybe you could run via 512e on the storage only drive.

But 512e is not a good solution for a DVR since you will often have the situation of misaligned file boundaries. If one video file uses 3 emulated 512 sectors inside one 4K sector, and then the next file wants to use the other 5, you'd have to read the entire 4K sector into memory, merge the new data with the old, and then rewrite the entire sector. This is bound to happen since the DVR software, by definition in this example, thinks it is running on a 512 byte sector drive. Now imagine doing this for 5 write and 3 read processes at once and you pretty soon get someplace I don't think you want to be.

Sure, there are plenty of ways to get 4K sector drives to work...but given the parameters of a DVR I think you either want it done via 512 byte emulation in some dedicated hardware (i.e. a USB drive, which is how Dish does it) or you want to do it through native 4K sector support in the OS (which is exactly what DirecTV has done in the HR34).


Whoosh... :lol:

Rich

#183 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 19,853 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:16 PM

That would be overstated statement about HW incapability without any technical point of that

- current HW is OK to work with 4K sectors, just need to do some updates on DVR Linux drivers and core as it was done in Linux world ...

#184 OFFLINE   unixguru

unixguru

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 579 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:44 AM

That workaround was the best I could think of. Yeah, it would be a PITA for most folks. And it was/is expensive. But it works quite well.


You've certainly got the most robust arrangement I've ever heard of. (Although it can't handle a natural disaster :D)

It's the best you can do given the tools DTV gives us.

It's far from cheap or user friendly. DTV needs to give us better solutions.

#185 OFFLINE   unixguru

unixguru

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 579 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Posted 11 October 2012 - 07:55 AM

There you'll get the good old "it's only TV" answer.


Sure. My wife has a wall of bookcases stuffed full of books. If those were lost would people say "they're only books"?

Both are entertainment. Personally I'm not big on books but I understand their value to people.

At least if you lose a freezer full of food for most reasons, your homeowner's insurance will cover it.


Food and books are easily replaceable.

Lots of DTV programming is not easily replaceable.

#186 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,600 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 12 October 2012 - 12:22 PM

You've certainly got the most robust arrangement I've ever heard of. (Although it can't handle a natural disaster :D)


What can?

It's the best you can do given the tools DTV gives us.

It's far from cheap or user friendly. DTV needs to give us better solutions.


It was the only thing I could think of to do. If I hadn't spent the money for six owned HRs and 2TB drives for each one, it would have been a lot less, but it was worth it. I bought six 20-700s from MDU folks who had been the only owners and they all worked well. I bought them because D*'s replacement HRs were a royal PITA. I planned on using them as replacements, but they worked so well I sent a bunch of leased 20-700s and 21s back to D* and began to use the owned 20-700s. Naturally, with my luck, the 20-700s stabilized and I never had to use them as replacements.

Once all the HRs are programmed with the appropriate SLs, the system is more user friendly than I expected it to be.

Rich

#187 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,600 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 12 October 2012 - 12:30 PM

Sure. My wife has a wall of bookcases stuffed full of books. If those were lost would people say "they're only books"?

Both are entertainment. Personally I'm not big on books but I understand their value to people.


Don't know what to say about that. "It's only TV" is a pretty common answer for all the problems we have. I don't like it either.

Food and books are easily replaceable.

Lots of DTV programming is not easily replaceable.


So true. Not impossible, but not easy either.

Rich

#188 OFFLINE   unixguru

unixguru

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 579 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Posted 12 October 2012 - 03:49 PM

You've certainly got the most robust arrangement I've ever heard of. (Although it can't handle a natural disaster :D)

What can?


Now they will send us to an institution :grin:

If external storage could be moved from one DVR to another... then all you need is a pair of RAID storage devices with builtin replication and a fast pipe to a geographically distant location. Every block of data changed on A shows up on B. Lose A, still have all data at B. Standard operating procedure in enterprise computing for important stuff (accounting, inventory, etc).

Obviously that doesn't make sense - ever.

Would be a lot cheaper (no need for fast pipe) to have service at two locations and record everything at both. Of course then you definitely would want the ability to manage the DVR entirely from the internet.

#189 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,600 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 13 October 2012 - 11:30 AM

Now they will send us to an institution :grin:

If external storage could be moved from one DVR to another... then all you need is a pair of RAID storage devices with builtin replication and a fast pipe to a geographically distant location. Every block of data changed on A shows up on B. Lose A, still have all data at B. Standard operating procedure in enterprise computing for important stuff (accounting, inventory, etc).

Obviously that doesn't make sense - ever.

Would be a lot cheaper (no need for fast pipe) to have service at two locations and record everything at both. Of course then you definitely would want the ability to manage the DVR entirely from the internet.


And you'd be paying for two accounts.

Rich

#190 OFFLINE   inkahauts

inkahauts

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 15,117 posts
Joined: Nov 13, 2006

Posted 13 October 2012 - 05:03 PM

So the fact that everyone in my family has to share the pain is going to make it less?

Sure not the way my family works. I'd be the one getting the mob of "customer" complaints. They can lynch me. :lol:

This is no different than a home computer network. Our server has RAID storage too (and backups).

It's all a no-brainer. These are services that should be as reliable as anything else in the house. Would a similar failure rate be acceptable for a furnace, air conditioner, water heater, stove, refrigerator, freezer, microwave, ...? Those are all more reliable and to top it off one can get a service guy here with parts really quickly and when they are done it's back to full operation. May not even lose food. Lose a freezer full of food because of slow service and it's the same kind of $$ loss.

I know it's just TV. If I lost 2 months worth of a series where the story evolves each episode then I pretty much lost the whole season. Total value is comparable to a freezer full of food. With DTV I know that a failure means that I lose it all regardless of how fast the service.


!rolling

No, I don't think you understood my point. Everyone losing just a little means that most likely everyone will be able to find their shows online, and won't actually miss anything.

However, I see with the new genie ads, they have something listed that I have not yet seen, so I am hoping it comes soon and will be a far better resolution to the idea that you have lost your dvr. It appears as though they are trying to get it set up so that you can always go back and watch anything that was on in the last five weeks. I would assume this means they are trying to get a full on demand recording of every show for the last five weeks available to everyone. That will solve the issue of redundancy for 99.99% of their customers. Won''t help me, as I record seasons at a time, and then watch in big groups some shows, but as I know most people don't watch like I do....

#191 OFFLINE   unixguru

unixguru

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 579 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:43 AM

And you'd be paying for two accounts.


Sure. Disaster-proof is expensive. Two accounts are nothing compared to a fat data pipe for replication.

#192 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,600 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:00 AM

!rolling

No, I don't think you understood my point. Everyone losing just a little means that most likely everyone will be able to find their shows online, and won't actually miss anything.

However, I see with the new genie ads, they have something listed that I have not yet seen, so I am hoping it comes soon and will be a far better resolution to the idea that you have lost your dvr. It appears as though they are trying to get it set up so that you can always go back and watch anything that was on in the last five weeks. I would assume this means they are trying to get a full on demand recording of every show for the last five weeks available to everyone. That will solve the issue of redundancy for 99.99% of their customers. Won''t help me, as I record seasons at a time, and then watch in big groups some shows, but as I know most people don't watch like I do....


That's the way we watch series, too. We can't be the only ones who watch a series after the season ends. They built that 34 with little thought. Just put out a five tuner HR with a paltry 1TB drive in it that we would fill up quickly, making it a necessity to purchase an external device and a huge HDD.

Putting content on VOD is a fix of sorts, but it would be much easier to allow us to have the ability to watch the contents of any HDD recorded on any HR within an account on any HR within that account. It's the only way I can see to solve the problem.

I'm waiting patiently for the first person who puts a 4TB drive on a 34 to have that 34 fail (and they will, don't kid yourselves about that) and with it goes all the programming on that huge drive. Lost forever.

Rich

#193 OFFLINE   unixguru

unixguru

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 579 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Posted 14 October 2012 - 09:16 AM

!rolling

No, I don't think you understood my point. Everyone losing just a little means that most likely everyone will be able to find their shows online, and won't actually miss anything.

However, I see with the new genie ads, they have something listed that I have not yet seen, so I am hoping it comes soon and will be a far better resolution to the idea that you have lost your dvr. It appears as though they are trying to get it set up so that you can always go back and watch anything that was on in the last five weeks. I would assume this means they are trying to get a full on demand recording of every show for the last five weeks available to everyone. That will solve the issue of redundancy for 99.99% of their customers. Won''t help me, as I record seasons at a time, and then watch in big groups some shows, but as I know most people don't watch like I do....


There have been times in the past where we've lost a program due to a storm and we couldn't find it online - even months later.

Besides the time it takes to search for stuff online, when it's found it's always low-def. I put a lot of money into equipment and services for HD. DTV can stuff their low-def On Demand.

I've already outlined the right way to do things...

http://www.dbstalk.c...794#post3014794
http://www.dbstalk.c...523#post3067523




Protected By... spam firewall...And...