Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Disney HD Channel Update


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   elinsner

elinsner

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 7 posts
Joined: Oct 28, 2011

Posted 22 October 2012 - 09:13 AM

While I was waiting for AMC to work out their deal with Dish I found a great show on Disney XD called Tron: Uprising. I thought I was a little slow because I couldn't find the channel in HD, but after doing a little research on the Internet I realized that Dish pulled the HD feed on this channel some time ago when it pulled the HD feed for ESPN News.

Has their been any progress on getting these HD feeds up? It would be nice to watch the second season of this show in HD.

Thanks,

Erik

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   garys

garys

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,163 posts
Joined: Nov 04, 2005

Posted 22 October 2012 - 09:21 AM

No new info. Search Disney for history of contract dispute.

#3 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,509 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 22 October 2012 - 12:38 PM

Hi, and welcome...

FYI, Dish didn't pull the feed. Disney pulled the feed.

You can find more info online... but suffice to say, Dish thought it had a contract to carry these channels in HD... Disney did not... so Disney cut the feed. Disney also sued for back-pay for time that Dish had already been carrying them... and that's where we still sit today.

-- I like to go fast (not really)


#4 OFFLINE   elinsner

elinsner

    New Member

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 7 posts
Joined: Oct 28, 2011

Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:40 PM

Thanks. Hopefully they figure this out sooner than later.

#5 OFFLINE   altidude

altidude

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 89 posts
Joined: Jan 13, 2010

Posted 01 February 2013 - 03:15 PM

Thanks. Hopefully they figure this out sooner than later.


It's been about 2.5 years now so I'm guessing it will be "later", if ever.

Edited by altidude, 02 February 2013 - 11:18 AM.


#6 OFFLINE   tampa8

tampa8

    Godfather/Supporter

  • Registered
  • 1,806 posts
Joined: Mar 30, 2002

Posted 01 February 2013 - 04:44 PM

Misleading tittle. Should start with Any.

#7 OFFLINE   coffee

coffee

    Cool Member

  • Registered
  • 14 posts
Joined: Dec 16, 2008

Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:28 AM

Misleading tittle. Should start with Any.


Or at least have a question mark. :)

#8 OFFLINE   bnewt

bnewt

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 335 posts
Joined: Oct 02, 2003

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:38 PM

any idea when the current agreement expires between Dish & Disney?

********************************************
May God Guide and Guard the USA!
********************************************


#9 OFFLINE   Paul Secic

Paul Secic

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,095 posts
Joined: Dec 16, 2003

Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:44 AM

any idea when the current agreement expires between Dish & Disney?


At this point I don't care. When the ABC channels retrains come up, then we'll know about Disney/ESPN.

Enjoying AT 250 HBO, 

 

Equipment: VIP 722 reciever


#10 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,516 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 11 February 2013 - 05:23 PM

I can't remember the last time an ABC/Disney channel was taken completely off of DISH ... which would be a public sign that there was a negotiation. Perhaps the renewals have come and gone and both sides are willing to keep the status quo on the four channels.

The four channels are an odd type of dispute ... DISH added the HD feeds without explicit permission. ESPN complained and two years later managed to get the channels pulled from the service via a court battle. That case continues. But carriage of the SD feeds was not an issue.

I cannot imagine there not being some kind of renewal since 2008. That is a long time to go without some contract discussion. The "hope" that the next time the contract renews DISH and ESPN will be forced to settle their differences seems to be a false hope.

Which is good because we really don't need ALL of the ABC/Disney channels for a month while they bicker - but it is bad because with status quo there does not seem to be room for improvement.

#11 OFFLINE   dennispap

dennispap

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 652 posts
Joined: Feb 01, 2007

Posted 11 February 2013 - 05:53 PM

Dish vs espn to go to court today.

http://www.dailyfina...pn-go-to-court/

#12 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,509 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 11 February 2013 - 06:47 PM

This quote from that link seems odd to me:

"Because all subscribers subsidize the sports channels - whether they watch them or not - carriers have been reluctant to offer subscribers a sports-less package, fearing that it would drive up costs for those who want the sports channels to a level where those subscribers would flee because of the high prices."

The odd part, to me, is that this statement is made as if it only applies to the sports channels. It applies to ALL channels in the tiered-packages. Only the a-la-cart channels are not part of the "subsidy" argument.

Acting as if only ESPN is being subsidized "whether you watch it or not" while that is true of literally hundreds of cable channels... that seems misleading to me.

There are lots of non-sports channels that I have never watched that I pay for too. Just seems an odd way to phrase things.

-- I like to go fast (not really)


#13 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,516 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:10 PM

I agree ... the article threw me off. It is good to know the jury trial is starting but the question of how much ESPN gets is an open secret. Those who care enough to follow a court case would already have a fairly good idea what the numbers are. The general public that doesn't know the numbers probably would not follow the case.

And the focus on sports channels going through the roof on price if they were not so widely distributed ignores other channels, popular or not.

#14 OFFLINE   phrelin

phrelin

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 13,375 posts
  • LocationNorthern California Redwoods
Joined: Jan 18, 2007

Posted 12 February 2013 - 01:30 PM

I think there is a key point to be made - ESPN is a significant cost in all packages. It is as if in order to be able to provide CBS, the carriers had to include Showtime in the basic package level for $8 a month. I don't think people know this.

You're right about nobody following the case therefore no impact, though. The problem is unless someone like Justin Bieber tweets about it, the general public will continue to be unaware.

"In a hundred years there'll be a whole new set of people."
"Always poke the bears. They sleep too much for their own good."

"If you're good enough, they'll talk about you." - Tom Harmon
A GEEZER who remembers watching TV in 1951 and was an Echostar customer from 1988 to 2008, now a Dish Network customer.
My AV Setup
My Slingbox Pro HD Experience
My Blog: The Redwood Guardian


#15 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,509 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:00 PM

I think there is a key point to be made - ESPN is a significant cost in all packages.


True... but some channel would be the most expensive one unless all channels were paid at the same rate.

And... people easily ignore that the older/more expensive/popular channels tend to make it possible for the other channels to get on the air.

Without ESPN and a handful of other high-rating channels, all the other channels wouldn't get enough ratings by themselves to drive people to subscribe.

So... people argue "pull ESPN out and make it an add-on"... but then people who want ESPN will still be "forced" to buy that other qualifying package of channels they don't want to watch in order to buy ESPN...

So, it always seems to me to be a classic case of "What I want is good, what you want is wrong"... people choose to ignore that while they are paying some to ESPN and might not watch it... lots of others are paying for the channels they like, without watching.

IF we went back to a only-pay-for-what-you-watch scenario, people would be rudely awakened to how many channels they like would go away... and how many others would cost more than ESPN!

-- I like to go fast (not really)


#16 OFFLINE   phrelin

phrelin

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 13,375 posts
  • LocationNorthern California Redwoods
Joined: Jan 18, 2007

Posted 12 February 2013 - 05:58 PM

I don't see it that way.

Yes, there's lots of channels out there charging a few dimes a month that have to be part of a package to survive. There's a collective good in that.

Then there's the premium channels like HBO that acquire expensive content of sufficient interest that people will pay a "premium" for it. I don't see the difference between that and expensive sports entertainment. It is a premium entertainment form and should be a premium package.

There will always be movies and shows akin to what HBO offers on broadcast and cable network channels. There will always be sports akin to what ESPN offers on broadcast and cable network channels. IMHO they both should be packaged a premium entertainment.

"In a hundred years there'll be a whole new set of people."
"Always poke the bears. They sleep too much for their own good."

"If you're good enough, they'll talk about you." - Tom Harmon
A GEEZER who remembers watching TV in 1951 and was an Echostar customer from 1988 to 2008, now a Dish Network customer.
My AV Setup
My Slingbox Pro HD Experience
My Blog: The Redwood Guardian


#17 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,516 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 12 February 2013 - 06:00 PM

The problem is unless someone like Justin Bieber tweets about it, the general public will continue to be unaware.

Yeah ... if Bieber tweeted about it people would wonder if he was back on drugs. Biebs buddy ... you can afford it!

As for the rest of us ... :)

#18 OFFLINE   BillJ

BillJ

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 822 posts
Joined: May 05, 2005

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:27 AM

I don't see it that way.

Yes, there's lots of channels out there charging a few dimes a month that have to be part of a package to survive. There's a collective good in that.

Then there's the premium channels like HBO that acquire expensive content of sufficient interest that people will pay a "premium" for it. I don't see the difference between that and expensive sports entertainment. It is a premium entertainment form and should be a premium package.

There will always be movies and shows akin to what HBO offers on broadcast and cable network channels. There will always be sports akin to what ESPN offers on broadcast and cable network channels. IMHO they both should be packaged a premium entertainment.


The problem with making ESPN an add-on goes back to the beginning of television. The broadcast networks used live sports to build audience for the new medium. Generations grew up with "free" broadcasts of major sporting events and, thanks to Wide World of Sports, many they had never seen before. Taking away "free" sports is like taking away some basic American right for many.

I don't watch ESPN 24/7 like some people I know, but I watch enough that I would feel pain at its loss. OTOH, with a DISH bill that's going to jump $17 next week, I'm not excited about paying another $7 or $8 for an add-on sports channel or package. I think something has to be done to control the rising cost of sports viewing. But then I could say the same for the rising cost of actually attending the games. As long as the Cubs continue to fill Wrigley Field I know I'm on the losing side of that battle.

#19 OFFLINE   Food Lion Man

Food Lion Man

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 30 posts
  • LocationOutside of Charlotte, NC
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:10 PM

Here is the latest prediction from tvpredictions.com:


Dish: We'll Keep ESPN, Disney
By Swanni

Washington, D.C. (February 21, 2013) -- Dish executives yesterday said they expect to be able to negotiate a new carriage deal with Disney, including ESPN, despite the fact the two companies are battling each other in two separate lawsuits.

The current contract expires in September of this year. I wonder if we'll have to wait until then for Disney, ESPNEWS, and ABC Family to return in HD?

#20 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,516 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:25 PM

That is the first I've seen of a contract end date. I wish it had been from a better source.

Contract renewal is a good time for a programmer to make demands and withhold channels if those demands are not met. So ABC/Disney channels in HD or gone completely? Hopefully we at least end up with the status quo.




spam firewall