Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Loosing satillite signal at night HELP
Posted 19 November 2012 - 09:55 AM
either case - extensive long testing plus expensive repair or easy replacement
||...Ads Help To Support This Site...||
Posted 19 November 2012 - 10:15 AM
Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:30 AM
Posted 19 November 2012 - 08:25 PM
The good stuff will never do that. Throw the cheap stuff away.
... I have had spools of RG-6 in which, on short cut jumper wires with lengths or one foot long or so, I can easily push the center conductor in with my fingertip.
In my extensive professional experience "suck-out" refers to two things, but neither of them have to do with a differential between both ends of a section of cable, or relative migration of a CC in one direction but not back in the other direction over time.
Actually, the effect of the shrinkage differential that takes place due to temperature cycles is common enough and significant enough to have its own term, "suck outs". One commercial antenna company I briefly worked for called them "creepers" It was easy to find contemporary use of the term "suck outs" using google, but "creeper" didn't come up on the first twenty results, so I don't know if other installers ever embraced that term or not.
When it refers to the center-conductor "sucking out" of where it belongs, that is a differential not between one end and the other, but between the CC and the shield. The shield is typically crunched down into a connector at both ends, and when temps drop, the entire length of cable may become shorter, meaning that the CC becomes shorter along with and in concert with the shield.
But since the shield is crunched down, it still makes contact with the housing on both ends. Under tension, but still connected. The CC is not connected to anything on either end for RG-6, so while it contracts in concert with the shield, it can pull out of the location it needs to be, breaking contact. But there is really nothing that could cause it to suck out of one end and not the other unless it was cut shorter on one end, and when temps return the CC expands to the same postion it had originally.
If this other theory of yours did hold any credence, the farther away from the center of the span, the more the CC would move relative to the shield, but in opposite directions depending upon which side of the center of the span we are talking about. There would also be no relative movement at all in the physical center of the span. And there is no reason it would not "creep" back to where it crept from either; there is no magical longitudinal force operating in just one direction along the length of the CC that is not also operating equally upon the dielctric, shield, and jacket as well.
For hard-line cable this can happen at one end only because one end of the CC is mistakenly not always crunched down while the other correctly is (typically it mates using a set-screw rather than floating against spring fingers like RG-6), which is why there are expansion loops in every span. And hard-line cable CCs are indeed bound to the foam dielectic to prevent this, which is why you might see more issues with air dielectric or with dilectric spacers than with full foam dielectric. This problem accounts for a lot of the cable outages that happen when temps drop to 20 below (and coincidentally exactly when you want to stay in and watch TV), and is why full foam is better in cold or harsh climates.
But just like with RG-6, when temps go back up, the CC goes right back to its original position relative to the shield. Nothing would make the shield migrate relatively north over time while the CC migrates relatively south; that's completely ludicrous and against all known laws of physics, as well as takes into account all possible forces.
The other "suck out" refers to a notched out part of a frequency band. But none of these could account for the CC migrating independently to one end, unless maybe you are using magic cheap cable procured off the back of a truck from the Russian mafia. The "gravity" argument seems to not really hold any water either, and even if it did would not apply to a typical home DBS installation.
Posted 19 November 2012 - 10:03 PM