Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of DBSTalk by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Time Warner Cable CEO Says It’s Time To Thin The Cable Channel Herd


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#41 OFFLINE   harsh

harsh

    Beware the Attack Basset

  • Registered
  • 17,820 posts
  • LocationSalem, OR
Joined: Jun 14, 2003

Posted 10 December 2012 - 10:02 AM

Espn has begun to counter that by using all those channels for overflow games. And games are their bread and butter.

ESPN's bread and butter is advertising. This must not be ignored.

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. -- JFK


...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#42 OFFLINE   Newshawk

Newshawk

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 2,427 posts
Joined: Sep 02, 2004

Posted 10 December 2012 - 10:12 AM

ESPN's bread and butter is advertising. This must not be ignored.

As my Intro to American Broadcasting professor once said, the sole reason American commercial broadcasting exists is to deliver the largest number of eyeballs possible to a point in time where an advertiser can present their message.

DIRECTV employee April 2004-November 2012.
The above comments are my own because I don't know if anyone would care about my opinions anymore.


#43 OFFLINE   hdtvfan0001

hdtvfan0001

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 31,525 posts
Joined: Jul 28, 2004

Posted 10 December 2012 - 10:26 AM

The most interesting thing to me about his comments is that likely the same thing is being said at many places....he just said it publicly.
DBSTalk CHAT ROOM MODERATOR
DirecTV Customer Since 1996

#44 OFFLINE   Paul Secic

Paul Secic

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,995 posts
Joined: Dec 16, 2003

Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:51 AM

Bingo. How many times a day can you watch reruns of Law & Order across MULTIPLE channels? :rolleyes:


5 to 6 times a day including locals.

Enjoying AT 250 HBO, 

 

Equipment: VIP 722 reciever


#45 OFFLINE   bidger

bidger

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,935 posts
Joined: Nov 19, 2005

Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:49 PM

The most interesting thing to me about his comments is that likely the same thing is being said at many places....he just said it publicly.


And if it were Mike White making the comments there would be a bunch of people on this board jumping on the bandwagon. Because it's a competitor some seem to want to dispute it.
TiVo HD (upgraded to 500 GB), Cisco Tuning Adapter 1520, TWC Digital Explorer Pak and Turbo Internet, TC-P50U50, SONY NSZ-GT1 BD player and Google TV box, Yamaha RX-V373 A/V receiver, Squeezebox Duet music streaming device

#46 OFFLINE   hdtvfan0001

hdtvfan0001

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 31,525 posts
Joined: Jul 28, 2004

Posted 10 December 2012 - 08:10 PM

And if it were Mike White making the comments there would be a bunch of people on this board jumping on the bandwagon. Because it's a competitor some seem to want to dispute it.

Perhaps....then again....maybe not.

We are approaching a tipping point between having "x" number of HD channels (and I'm a big fan of HD channels if you couldn't tell :D) and pricing services out of the range of the mainstream customer base.

At some point, there comes a time when having any content delivery provider like cable, DirecTV, or other one is asked to pay a disproportionate amount of fee to transmit a channel - becomes out of line with the viewing numbers. At that point, it becomes a losing proposition. Last time I checked, all of these providers were for-profit companies.

I have no problem with what the cable exec stated - it happens to be a fact - this is on the verge of impacting all pay-TV service customers. Unless the greed of the original content providers ceases, we'll all start to see rising prices to the point that consumers can no longer afford what they may have today. The fact that ESPN alone charges somewhere in the $6.00 -7.50 range per month for their channels seems exorbitant.
DBSTalk CHAT ROOM MODERATOR
DirecTV Customer Since 1996

#47 OFFLINE   satcrazy

satcrazy

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 674 posts
  • LocationGreat lakes, NW Pa.
Joined: Mar 15, 2011

Posted 10 December 2012 - 10:05 PM

5 to 6 times a day including locals.




You bet!

better this than multiple espn channels that I never watch.

I enjoy baseball myself, and I'd be ok with paying "per game" when I wanted to watch one, instead of subbing to sports channels that are of no interest to me.

#48 OFFLINE   fleckrj

fleckrj

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 1,014 posts
  • LocationCary, NC
Joined: Sep 04, 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 07:19 AM

And if it were Mike White making the comments there would be a bunch of people on this board jumping on the bandwagon. Because it's a competitor some seem to want to dispute it.


Regardless of who said it first or who said it publicly, some people on this board will agree and others will disagree. I agree that the number of channels cannot continue to grow, especially since many of what were once niche channels are regressing to some sort of homogenous common denominator to get more viewers than they had as a niche channel.




spam firewall