Jump to content

Welcome to DBSTalk

Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
Guest Message by DevFuse

- - - - -

Sharing article on sports costs

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#41 OFFLINE   mreposter


    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,710 posts
Joined: Jul 29, 2006

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:01 PM

Sports TV Costs Will Continue To Soar As Benefits Still Outweigh Costs: Analyst

Interesting article. The numbers on the cost of the channel per actual viewer was eye-opening. I'd never thought of it calculating it that way - the total cost of a channel to a provider (ie: Directv) divided by the actual number of people that watch the channel.
.......... There are none so blind as those who can not see it in HD.
.......... Directv customer since January 2000.

...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#42 OFFLINE   Mike Bertelson

Mike Bertelson

    6EQUJ5 WOW!

  • Moderators
  • 13,966 posts
Joined: Jan 24, 2007

Posted 04 February 2013 - 08:57 PM

Back when cable companies had to report that kind of data to the CT Department of Public Utilities Commission (called something else now), the CT cable co's were paying ≈$1/subscriber for ESPN...1999 time frame. God knows what it is today.

They still have to report the data but it's "confidential" and not to released to the public.


Since it costs 1.66¢ to produce a penny, my 2¢ worth is really 3.32¢ worth.  That 3.32¢ is my own and not the 3.32¢ of DIRECTV, Dish, or anyone else for that matter.

#43 OFFLINE   Satelliteracer


    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • Registered
  • 3,042 posts
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

Posted 07 February 2013 - 11:51 AM

Disney's sports costs up, earnings down. Paying a lot more for sports fees. Ulitimately that means they will try to push those on the distributors. Article below

Disney yesterday posted lower earnings “due in part to the rising costs of acquiring TV sports rights for its ESPN division,” according to Grover & Zeidler of REUTERS. Net income “fell 6 percent" to $1.38B from $1.46B, and net income per share “fell 4 percent to 77 cents a share from 80 cents a share for the company's fiscal first quarter.” Revenues “rose 5 percent to $11.3 billion" from $10.78B a year earlier. Reuters analysis showed that Wall Street was “expecting revenues" of $11.2B. Disney said that operating income at its cable networks decreased $15M to $952M for the quarter "due to a decrease at ESPN, partially offset by growth at its Disney Channel, ABC Family and A&E Television Networks” (REUTERS, 2/5). In N.Y., Brooks Barnes reported ESPN had a “significant impact on Disney’s quarter, with programming expenses increasing for football and basketball.” Those costs “held back results for Disney’s media networks unit, which houses the cable sports behemoth; operating income there increased a tepid 2 percent" to $1.21B (NYTIMES.com, 2/5). CABLEFAX DAILY reports ESPN’s rising programming costs “reflected rate increases for college football and the NFL, as well as an increase in the number of NBA games due to the lockout in the prior year” (CABLEFAX DAILY, 2/6). In L.A., Dawn Chmielewski reported Disney’s results “also included a $219-million gain from the sale of its 50% interest in ESPN Star sports in India to its joint venture partner, News Corp.” (LATIMES.com, 2/5).

HEADING HIGHER: Disney Chair & CEO Bob Iger said the "price increases that we have for ESPN are primarily increases that we believe reflect the continued value proposition for ESPN, for the distributor and for the advertiser … and we’ll be able to continue to raise ESPN’s rates." Iger: "We don’t do so in any cavalier fashion. We’ve been investing in its programming and in the production and believe that value proposition is still there strongly.” He noted programming costs were high this quarter because of the "increase in rights fees" for college football. Iger: “But if you look at the year, the costs for ESPN’s programming will start to flatten out. We also have some distribution deals whose increases don’t kick in until after the first quarter” (“Closing Bell with Maria Bartiromo,” CNBC, 2/5). SNL Kagan data shows that ESPN currently “charges distributors $5 per household per month -- the most of any network.” But Iger “defended higher rates for ESPN, saying customers are getting more for their money through add-ons such as the WatchESPN mobile app” (N.Y. POST, 2/6).

DIRECTV employee

All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV




  • DBSTalk Club
  • 885 posts
  • LocationFLORIDA
Joined: Feb 16, 2003

Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:33 AM

SNL Kagan data shows that ESPN currently “charges distributors $5 per household per month -- the most of any network.”

Is that $5 charge for all 4 ESPN channels ( ESPN,ESPN 2, ESPN U and ESPN NEWS ) ?

Protected By... spam firewall...And...