Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

‘Dish Anywhere’ Trademark Challenged by DirecTV, Cable Operators


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Athlon646464

Athlon646464

    Hall Of Fame

  • News Hound
  • 3,045 posts
  • LocationUxbridge, MA
Joined: Feb 23, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 06:57 AM

‘Dish Anywhere’ Trademark Challenged by DirecTV, Cable Operators
 
Dish Network’s Sling-powered Internet video streaming service, Dish Anywhere, is not only being contested on legal grounds by Fox — the satcaster also now is fighting with pay TV rivals over its trademark claim to the name.
 
DirecTV, Comcast, Cablevision, Cox, Time Warner Cable and Charter filed challenges Wednesday to Dish’s claim on “Dish Anywhere” with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
 
They each argue that “Anywhere” is a generic term that other companies have used for related services, and claim they would be “damaged” if Dish obtained exclusive rights to the name.
 
features-1.jpg

1 HR34-700, 1 C31-700, 1 C41W-100, 1 WVBR0-01, 1 HR24-500

Original install on Apr. 20, 2008 - C41W & WVB self installed on Dec. 27, 2014 - HR34 & C31 installed on Aug. 24, 2013 - HR24 installed on July 23, 2010

Press any key to continue, or any other key to cancel.


...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#2 OFFLINE   tsmacro

tsmacro

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,325 posts
  • LocationEast Central Indiana
Joined: Apr 28, 2005

Posted 28 September 2013 - 08:57 AM

It's hard to imagine any other company being hurt by not being able to use the term Dish Anywhere. I highly doubt that they're not allowed to use the word anywhere if they wanted to just not Dish Anywhere. So if for example Directv wanted to say Directv Anywhere, that's not the same thing and should be ok. Basically this sounds like a lawsuit that some lawyer came up with to make some extra money and used his debating skills to convince the tv providers involved that it would be a good idea.


"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair." - Douglas Adams

"Who would rule a nation when he could have easier work, such as carrying water uphill in a sieve?" - Robert Jordan


#3 OFFLINE   dualsub2006

dualsub2006

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 876 posts
Joined: Aug 28, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:00 AM

Actually, if Dish is awarded the trademark for Dish Anywhere, they can the challenge any other competitors use of the word Anywhere for any product or service as confusing to consumers and diluting their brand.

Happens all the time.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using DBSTalk mobile app



#4 OFFLINE   JosephB

JosephB

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 1,183 posts
  • LocationBirmingham, AL
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:24 AM

It's hard to imagine any other company being hurt by not being able to use the term Dish Anywhere. I highly doubt that they're not allowed to use the word anywhere if they wanted to just not Dish Anywhere. So if for example Directv wanted to say Directv Anywhere, that's not the same thing and should be ok. Basically this sounds like a lawsuit that some lawyer came up with to make some extra money and used his debating skills to convince the tv providers involved that it would be a good idea.

 

The problem is that Dish could turn around and sue DirecTV for using "DirecTV Anywhere" or Comcast for using "Comcast Anywhere" because it is "close" to Dish Anywhere. Trademark law is a little complicated sometimes.



#5 OFFLINE   tsmacro

tsmacro

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,325 posts
  • LocationEast Central Indiana
Joined: Apr 28, 2005

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:25 AM

 

Actually, if Dish is awarded the trademark for Dish Anywhere, they can the challenge any other competitors use of the word Anywhere for any product or service as confusing to consumers and diluting their brand.

Happens all the time.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using DBSTalk mobile app

 Somehow I doubt it. I don't doubt that some lawyer might try to convince Dish to try to sue if anyone used the word anywhere but I doubt it would be a winnable case as just "anywhere" is way too generic. Plus it does say they filed specifically to trademark "Dish Anywhere" not just anywhere.


"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair." - Douglas Adams

"Who would rule a nation when he could have easier work, such as carrying water uphill in a sieve?" - Robert Jordan


#6 OFFLINE   bigglebowski

bigglebowski

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 225 posts
Joined: Jul 26, 2010

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:28 AM

Is Directv upset because "anywhere" actually means anywhere and not just the vicinity of your router's wifi range.


  • mcgrathlb likes this

#7 OFFLINE   WebTraveler

WebTraveler

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 1,089 posts
Joined: Apr 09, 2006

Posted 28 September 2013 - 11:10 AM

This is dumb.

 

Directv can use Direct anywhere or Directv anywhere.

 

Would a court uphold this if someone tried to steal McDonald's anywhere? 

 

Dish has a trademark on Dish.



#8 OFFLINE   RasputinAXP

RasputinAXP

    Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

  • Registered
  • 3,141 posts
Joined: Jan 23, 2008

Posted 28 September 2013 - 11:46 AM

Qv: Apple v Amazon, re 'app store' trademark.

Hint: they didn't rule for Apple.

You can't claim a generic term alone when it's used with a descriptor like Amazon or Dish.

"Belligerent and numerous."

SlingTV, Tablo and Plex to Roku 3s and Chromecasts on a Vizio 42" in the living room and a Toshiba 32" in my bedroom. Xbox 360 client on a Westinghouse 42" in the game room. Tablets EVERYWHERE!

 

I used to update the Dish Network FAQ but not anymore.


#9 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 20,632 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 28 September 2013 - 12:50 PM

Right... Apple couldn't prevent Amazon from having an Amazon app store...  so I see no reason why DirecTV couldn't have their own "anywhere" phrase.

 

But with that in mind...  "Sunday" is a day of the week and "ticket" is a generic word that people use for lots of things... so why can't Dish have their own "Sunday Ticket"?  I bet DirecTV wouldn't agree in that scenario.


-- !rotaredoM mA eM

What I do when I'm not here


#10 OFFLINE   comizzou573

comizzou573

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 285 posts
Joined: Aug 06, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 01:14 PM

Dish anywhere is kind of a scam to me, I just installed a hopper w/sling and download the app on my android incredible and I can watch tv anywhere. I wasn't as impressed in the receiver. I cant ever access my tv from the ip address on my tv. 



#11 ONLINE   phrelin

phrelin

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 13,851 posts
  • LocationNorthern California Redwoods
Joined: Jan 18, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 01:47 PM

This is the kind of thing that makes attorneys rich. And Charlie had to know when he released the Hopper that he would be in a long-term grudge match with everyone in the business. What's ironic about this is that if you Google tv anywhere, DirectTV Everwhere gets paid results at the top of the page along with Dish.

And let us not forget the ties here, such as those between Comcast and NBC or Cablevision and AMC. There's a reason the term "media conglomerates" appears in many stories.

"In a hundred years there'll be a whole new set of people."
"Always poke the bears. They sleep too much for their own good."

"If you're good enough, they'll talk about you." - Tom Harmon
A GEEZER who remembers watching TV in 1951 and was an Echostar customer from 1988 to 2008, now a Dish Network customer.
My AV Setup
My Slingbox Pro HD Experience
My Blog: The Redwood Guardian


#12 OFFLINE   dualsub2006

dualsub2006

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 876 posts
Joined: Aug 28, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 02:11 PM

But with that in mind... "Sunday" is a day of the week and "ticket" is a generic word that people use for lots of things... so why can't Dish have their own "Sunday Ticket"? I bet DirecTV wouldn't agree in that scenario.

It would be the NFL in a twist in your scenario because the NFL owns the Sunday Ticket trademark and it is licensed to D*.

An Apple/Amazon ruling wouldn't prevent another judge in another Federal district from ruling differently.

If your D* (or any of the others) do you risk playing roulette, or do you try to prevent the trademark from being issued?



#13 OFFLINE   TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,942 posts
  • LocationPhoenix, AZ
Joined: Oct 01, 2003

Posted 28 September 2013 - 02:30 PM

Lame. Why don't they all join together and fight these rising carrier fees instead?

#14 OFFLINE   damondlt

damondlt

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 5,379 posts
  • LocationNewfoundland, Pa
Joined: Feb 27, 2006

Posted 28 September 2013 - 02:53 PM

The problem is that Dish could turn around and sue DirecTV for using "DirecTV Anywhere" or Comcast for using "Comcast Anywhere" because it is "close" to Dish Anywhere. Trademark law is a little complicated sometimes.

Um Directv calls it "Directv Everywhere"

 

See you would have already lost your lawsuit!


Blue Ridge Communticatons

Digital HD Basic Plus, Cinemax,Showtime/TMC,Starz /Encore
Tivo T6 (Roamio Plus) Master Bedroom,Samsung 5300 40 Inch

Tivo Mini Livingroom Vizio M602i-B3 60 Inch

Tivo Mini Bedroom 2  LG 26LE5300 26 Inch
Tivo Mini Bedroom 3  Element ELEFW328 32 Inch
Cisco HD ,Bedroom office 4  Magnavox 32 inch

Arris Touchstone DG1660

Dream 60 Mbps down 3 Mbps up.

 


#15 ONLINE   phrelin

phrelin

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 13,851 posts
  • LocationNorthern California Redwoods
Joined: Jan 18, 2007

Posted 28 September 2013 - 03:32 PM

Here with footnote links is the Wikipedia entry on TV Everywhere:

 

TV Everywhere (TVE[1]) refers to customers of multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) watching content on mobile devices such as the iPad,[2] as well as the verification system that allows MVPDs to authenticate those who wish to use their IPTV video on demand Internet television services as actual paying customers of satellite or cable television. In June 2009, Comcast and Time Warner held a press conference to announce the initiative.[3][4][5] Several consumer groups complained that TV Everywhere consists of an anticompetitive practice stifling competition in online television.[6]

 

On June 5, 2013, Bell Media introduced the TV Everywhere concept to Canada with the launch of its Bravo Go service.[7]

 

If it didn't cost all these signal providers money which costs will be passed on to us, it'd be downright amusing that these morons are challenging Dish on the use of "anywhere" which according to Dictionary.com means "in, at, or to any place" as opposed to the definition of "everywhere" which means "in every place or part; in all places."

 

I wonder if I could intervene and to advise the court that both terms without the modifying phrase "where a strong, high speed internet signal is available" are "misleading." wink.gif


Edited by phrelin, 28 September 2013 - 03:33 PM.

"In a hundred years there'll be a whole new set of people."
"Always poke the bears. They sleep too much for their own good."

"If you're good enough, they'll talk about you." - Tom Harmon
A GEEZER who remembers watching TV in 1951 and was an Echostar customer from 1988 to 2008, now a Dish Network customer.
My AV Setup
My Slingbox Pro HD Experience
My Blog: The Redwood Guardian


#16 OFFLINE   JosephB

JosephB

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 1,183 posts
  • LocationBirmingham, AL
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

Posted 28 September 2013 - 05:15 PM

The Apple vs. Amazon thing is absolutely why the other carriers are challenging Dish.

 

They already have a trademark on "Dish", so if "anywhere" is a generic term then it is not trademark-able. If the other carriers don't put up a fight, though, and Dish DOES get it trademarked, then the term "Anywhere" when it comes to television services out of the home would then belong to Dish, regardless of whether or not it is associated with Dish or not. It's why people got sued for using the letter i before the names of iPod accessories. Even if it is not exact, if it is confusing in the marketplace, then Dish would be able to enforce their trademark.



#17 OFFLINE   RasputinAXP

RasputinAXP

    Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

  • Registered
  • 3,141 posts
Joined: Jan 23, 2008

Posted 30 September 2013 - 08:33 AM

The Apple vs. Amazon thing is absolutely why the other carriers are challenging Dish.

 

They already have a trademark on "Dish", so if "anywhere" is a generic term then it is not trademark-able. If the other carriers don't put up a fight, though, and Dish DOES get it trademarked, then the term "Anywhere" when it comes to television services out of the home would then belong to Dish, regardless of whether or not it is associated with Dish or not. It's why people got sued for using the letter i before the names of iPod accessories. Even if it is not exact, if it is confusing in the marketplace, then Dish would be able to enforce their trademark.

 

The exact trademark is "Dish Anywhere" per the filing at the USPTO. Apple has a valid trademark on "Apple App Store" while Amazon has one on "Amazon App Store." 

There's nothing that prevents DirecTV from creating "DirecTV Anywhere" just like "Dish Anywhere." It even has a Distinctiveness Limitation Statement saying "as to DISH." 

 

The appellants have no legal standing on this one.


  • tsmacro likes this

"Belligerent and numerous."

SlingTV, Tablo and Plex to Roku 3s and Chromecasts on a Vizio 42" in the living room and a Toshiba 32" in my bedroom. Xbox 360 client on a Westinghouse 42" in the game room. Tablets EVERYWHERE!

 

I used to update the Dish Network FAQ but not anymore.


#18 OFFLINE   acostapimps

acostapimps

    Hall Of Famer

  • Registered
  • 1,866 posts
  • LocationIllinois
Joined: Nov 05, 2011

Posted 01 October 2013 - 01:27 PM

....And money is rollin in for the lawyers, and the winners would be... you guessed it.

Directv Genie DVR HR44-700
Directv HD DVR HR24-500
Directv HD Receiver H24-200
Directv Wireless Mini Client C41W-100 (Deactivated)
Directv Standard SD Receiver D12-700 

SWM 16  SWM 8-Way Splitter  SWM 2-Way Splitter  Slimline 5LNB  

Directv Subscriber From 2009-?





Protected By... spam firewall...And...