Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Broadcasters take their case against Aereo to the Supreme Court & Win


  • Please log in to reply
195 replies to this topic

#181 OFFLINE   tonyd79

tonyd79

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 12,700 posts
  • LocationColumbia, MD
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Posted 01 July 2014 - 02:10 PM

There is merit in your idea... I don't know if there is too much bad blood by now between the carries and the broadcasters to allow such a thing, though.  But it would be a good compromise.  Those old boxes if they were rigged as LiL-only boxes would become essentially no different than the digital converter boxes that many people have to use for their older TVs now anyway.

 

No, no. no. They are nothing like the digital converter boxes that just tuned to FREE OTA broadcasts. You talking about re-transmission from satellite, not an OTA tuner box.


LR: HR34-700, H24-200, Fios DVR, BD350 Blu Ray, Roku Netflix Player, Chromecast, Sony 65w850 TV
BR: HR21-200, Viso 32LX, DB350 Blu Ray
Dish: Slimline, SWM8
Other: genieGo

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#182 OFFLINE   bflora

bflora

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 135 posts
Joined: Nov 05, 2007

Posted 01 July 2014 - 04:09 PM

It's not really irony though.  It's only your opinion that they are protesting benefits from the situation.  In their opinion they are not protesting the side-benefit.  They are protesting the theft and illegal profiting...  IF they get any side-promotional benefit, that's irrelevant to the complaint.

 

There are lots of real-world situations where a bad thing results in some good coming to the person/company who was wronged...  but we typically don't say it is ironic for them to still complain about the wrong thing just because it may have inadvertently benefited them in some way.

The irony is that they pay big bucks to expand their coverage area with taller more powerful transmitters and sue a company that does it for them for free.  I am not commenting on the legal or moral aspects of it.  Just the IRONY of it.



#183 OFFLINE   KyL416

KyL416

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,128 posts
  • LocationTobyhanna, PA
Joined: Nov 10, 2005

Posted 01 July 2014 - 04:39 PM

Aereo had no relationship with the stations and they never released hard subscriber data, any extended coverage area gained by Aereo was useless as they can't use that data for ratings which is used to set advertising rates. With the way Nielsen does their math, the entire DMA is already part of your coverage area, even if the only way to get the OTA signal is a deep fringe directional antenna on a mast to overcome an obstruction.

Oddly enough if an Aereo user was in the Nielsen survey it could have hurt the station ratings wise if they were watching a program via Aereo instead of something that could be used by the Nielsen box or if in the process of transcoding the OTA signal the embedded signal used by the Nielsen box was lost.

#184 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,854 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 01 July 2014 - 08:00 PM

No, no. no. They are nothing like the digital converter boxes that just tuned to FREE OTA broadcasts. You talking about re-transmission from satellite, not an OTA tuner box.

 

If I was reading Herdfan correctly, though, he was talking about a special scenario... wherein Dish (for example) would repurpose old receivers as usable only for the LiLs... and would allow users of those receivers access to the LiLs completely for free (outside of the cost of purchasing the receiver of course)... which in that scenario would be the same as if a customer bought a digital converter box and had no further costs.  As long as Dish gave access to those retransmissions for free, then I could see the broadcasters allowing them to retransmit their signal.  Dish would still need to get permission, but as long as Dish had no hidden charges, broadcasters would be foolish not to agree in Herdfan's proposed scenario.  He can correct me if I misread his post.

 

The irony is that they pay big bucks to expand their coverage area with taller more powerful transmitters and sue a company that does it for them for free.  I am not commenting on the legal or moral aspects of it.  Just the IRONY of it.

 

But they wouldn't be suing them for "doing it for free"...  IF the cable/satellite companies actually did it for free and didn't charge their customers and profit from it... then the broadcasters likely would not sue them for it.  That's why it is a disingenuous example.  saying "they are suing them for helping them" is obscuring the truth of the situation.  That would be like if someone robs me, neighbors donate money to help me in excess of what I lost from the robbery, but I press charges against the thief when he is caught and someone accuses me of pressing charges against a person who helped me make money and said it was "ironic"... when it isn't.


-- Respect the S.H.I.E.L.D.


#185 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 40,236 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 02 July 2014 - 05:52 AM

IF the cable/satellite companies actually did it for free and didn't charge their customers and profit from it... then the broadcasters likely would not sue them for it.


Wouldn't that be nice? I disagree with your opinion. While there would be stations that are happy to get their content distributed (they elect Must Carry and do not charge satellite or cable for carriage) the bigger stations, read: any station with network programming, will want payment even if retransmitted for free.

It doesn't matter how much or how little the rebroadcaster is making or even if they are losing money ... the broadcasters want control of their signal and the big broadcasters want payment for retransmission.

I'd love to see a rebroadcaster call the bluff of your local stations - because that is exactly what their offer was, a bluff. I have no expectation that any station who can charge under the current scheme would cease charging just because a rebroadcaster ceased charging.
Welcome to DBS Talk - Let's talk about DBS! (The Digital Bit Stream)
DISH Network vs DirecTV: HD Channel List - DISH Network HD Capacity, HD Conversion and more.
DISH Network complete channel lists and lists by satellite location are in The Uplink Activity Center.
Unless otherwise noted, I speak for myself. Content is not controlled by DISH Network, DirecTV or any other company.

#186 OFFLINE   bflora

bflora

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 135 posts
Joined: Nov 05, 2007

Posted 02 July 2014 - 07:22 AM

If I was reading Herdfan correctly, though, he was talking about a special scenario... wherein Dish (for example) would repurpose old receivers as usable only for the LiLs... and would allow users of those receivers access to the LiLs completely for free (outside of the cost of purchasing the receiver of course)... which in that scenario would be the same as if a customer bought a digital converter box and had no further costs.  As long as Dish gave access to those retransmissions for free, then I could see the broadcasters allowing them to retransmit their signal.  Dish would still need to get permission, but as long as Dish had no hidden charges, broadcasters would be foolish not to agree in Herdfan's proposed scenario.  He can correct me if I misread his post.

 

 

But they wouldn't be suing them for "doing it for free"...  IF the cable/satellite companies actually did it for free and didn't charge their customers and profit from it... then the broadcasters likely would not sue them for it.  That's why it is a disingenuous example.  saying "they are suing them for helping them" is obscuring the truth of the situation.  That would be like if someone robs me, neighbors donate money to help me in excess of what I lost from the robbery, but I press charges against the thief when he is caught and someone accuses me of pressing charges against a person who helped me make money and said it was "ironic"... when it isn't.

To say it isn't ironic is like saying something isn't funny.  To me it is "ironic".  To you, obviously not.



#187 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,967 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 02 July 2014 - 09:30 AM

But TV manufacturers and Digital Converter manufacturers all profit from selling equipment that has the ability to tune OTA.  So couldn't broadcasters sue these companies because they are making profit on something that can tune their signals?

 

Or are these companies paying royalties to some broadcast alliance for each country they sell in?


- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, MTV2, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD (formerly SWRV), Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#188 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,854 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 02 July 2014 - 12:17 PM

But TV manufacturers and Digital Converter manufacturers all profit from selling equipment that has the ability to tune OTA.  So couldn't broadcasters sue these companies because they are making profit on something that can tune their signals?

 

Or are these companies paying royalties to some broadcast alliance for each country they sell in?

 

I don't pretend to know the logistics of it... but without TVs and digital converters, nobody would be able to watch OTA broadcast... so they obviously have to "allow" such products to be sold.  Now in the UK there is a TV tax where you pay for each TV you have, and that goes to fund the programming.  Here in the US we don't have such a system, but I can't say for 100% that there isn't somehow a tie-in for TV/converter manufacturers that in some way funds the FCC.


-- Respect the S.H.I.E.L.D.


#189 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 40,236 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 02 July 2014 - 04:36 PM

But TV manufacturers and Digital Converter manufacturers all profit from selling equipment that has the ability to tune OTA.  So couldn't broadcasters sue these companies because they are making profit on something that can tune their signals?


Don't give broadcasters any ideas! The ability to tune OTA is not a violation of law. While some broadcasters may WANT to charge a fee at every opportunity, the TV/tuner industry is not one of those opportunities.


Or are these companies paying royalties to some broadcast alliance for each country they sell in?


No payment is required. TVs do not copy, tuners do not copy. The devices do not require any royalty to be bought, owned or used.

(Stewart's comment about UK Television licenses refers to a tax that funds public broadcasting ... not privately owned broadcast stations or networks.)
Welcome to DBS Talk - Let's talk about DBS! (The Digital Bit Stream)
DISH Network vs DirecTV: HD Channel List - DISH Network HD Capacity, HD Conversion and more.
DISH Network complete channel lists and lists by satellite location are in The Uplink Activity Center.
Unless otherwise noted, I speak for myself. Content is not controlled by DISH Network, DirecTV or any other company.

#190 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 19,854 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 02 July 2014 - 06:49 PM

Yeah... I probably should have clarified that since the UK also has some non-public-funded channels as well.  It was the closest thing I could think of, though, where in some country there was a fee related to the TV itself.


-- Respect the S.H.I.E.L.D.


#191 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,967 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 02 July 2014 - 09:23 PM

No payment is required. TVs do not copy, tuners do not copy. The devices do not require any royalty to be bought, owned or used.

 

Ok so tuners do not copy (unless you buy a DVR, but they are pretty good at "marrying" the recordings to the DVR it was made on).  

 

My mind can remember a show I watched OTA and I can sort of "play it back" in my head.  When are they going to start taxing my brain?  Heck, our society already sells canned air and bottled water!  


Edited by cypherx, 02 July 2014 - 09:24 PM.

- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, MTV2, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD (formerly SWRV), Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#192 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 40,236 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 02 July 2014 - 09:50 PM

My mind can remember a show I watched OTA and I can sort of "play it back" in my head.  When are they going to start taxing my brain?


Hopefully playing it back in your head is "personal use". Unless there are other people living inside your head ...

It wouldn't be a tax but a rights fee (although all of our brains may be physically taxed by some of the discussion in this thread). If you were to publicly perform the copyrighted work you may be liable for copyright violation.

So remember - when you stand around the watercooler giving your synopsis of your favorite show please keep quoted material to a responsible "fair use" level. Do not quote the entire show word for word (giving a public performance of copyrighted material). :)
Welcome to DBS Talk - Let's talk about DBS! (The Digital Bit Stream)
DISH Network vs DirecTV: HD Channel List - DISH Network HD Capacity, HD Conversion and more.
DISH Network complete channel lists and lists by satellite location are in The Uplink Activity Center.
Unless otherwise noted, I speak for myself. Content is not controlled by DISH Network, DirecTV or any other company.

#193 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 13,288 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 02 July 2014 - 10:32 PM

Word for word!? :)   The only show in modern times that I could do that with would be the The Dancer (A mute dancer teaches movement to adoring kids and wins the dance contest every Saturday night at a cavernous Brooklyn disco, makes the final cut for a Broadway show but is dismissed when.....) or that other one with the French guy, the name of which has left the building—I think there's one word of dialog.... :)


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#194 OFFLINE   Athlon646464

Athlon646464

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • News Hound
  • 2,862 posts
  • LocationUxbridge, MA
Joined: Feb 23, 2007

Posted 24 October 2014 - 05:28 AM

Update: Judge formally bans Aereo from streaming live TV to devices
 
(engadget.com) - Aereo can no longer relay TV shows to its customers using its teeny-tiny antennas (for now, that is), according to US District Judge Alison Nathan. It's been a while since the Supreme Court decided that the service violates the law by "transmitting performances of copyrighted work to the public," but it's only now that a judge has issued a temporary ban order.
 
Wondering what's next for Aereo? Well, the jury's still out on whether it can record and store programs to be aired at a later time. The judge didn't grant TV networks their request to stop the company from doing so, since they didn't include it as part of their demands when they first filed a lawsuit. She's currently investigating whether she should grant that request, though...
 
 
aereo_ceo_antennas_630pxbodyimg.jpg

1 HR34-700, 1 C31-700, 1 HR24-500
Original install on April 20, 2008 - HR34 & C31 installed on August 24, 2013 - HR24 installed on July 23, 2010

Press any key to continue, or any other key to cancel.


#195 OFFLINE   SeaBeagle

SeaBeagle

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 682 posts
Joined: May 07, 2006

Posted 24 October 2014 - 03:24 PM

Good Aereo would not let me even sign up.


Sent from my iPad 4 128GB using DBSTalk mobile app

#196 OFFLINE   KyL416

KyL416

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,128 posts
  • LocationTobyhanna, PA
Joined: Nov 10, 2005

Posted 24 October 2014 - 03:31 PM

Good Aereo would not let me even sign up.

Again, Aereo's purpose was NOT to let people get any market they want, at no point did they claim otherwise. Unless their antennas were setup in your market you could NOT get service.

Their purpose was to cater to cord cutters who couldn't get reliable OTA reception as well as those who wanted to watch local TV on the go since all those pocket TVs became obsolete with the digital transition.




Protected By... spam firewall...And...