Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

5400 vs 7200 RPM External Drives


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Jamus

Jamus

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 17 posts
Joined: Dec 09, 2004

Posted 24 November 2013 - 10:22 AM

I am trying to do a little research on adding external drives to a 722k.  From what I can find, the 722k has a 500GB internal drive.  As this drive fills up, my DVR gets more and more sluggish to respond to commands.  In addition to that, I would like to have a little more recording time for keeping some things on it long term.

 

To keep things peppy, I am considering a 7200 RPM drive with a good cache on it.  But knowing Dish (and Direct for that matter) probably put the cheapest lowest spec drives in their units they can get away with, I wonder if a 7200 will actually make any noticeable difference (especially since both would still be going out over USB2).

 

Has anyone seen any tests showing 5400 vs 7200 drive differences on Dish DVR's?



...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 19,758 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 24 November 2013 - 10:39 AM

you'll have no advantage, but you will pay more for the HDD (and electricity :) )

 

practically, you don't need to test 5.4 or 7.2K or 10K or 15K RPM drives; streaming of HD or SD recordings has well known values, so 5.4K RPM drive will support 4 HD stream just fine; counting size of the files you cold conclude insignificance of HDD's cache size






spam firewall