Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Can DTV Please Give More Bandwidth to the Sundance Channel?


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

#26 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 01 March 2014 - 10:15 AM

please, we lost track of the topic: DTV and bandwidth and Sundance channel :backtotop:


  • electrober6 likes this

...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#27 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,565 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 01 March 2014 - 05:09 PM

Rather than netcopping, why don't you add something of value that's on topic? 


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#28 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 01 March 2014 - 06:14 PM

I wrote what I could do to help TS...but seems to me dragging offtopic overthrown anything relevant, if follow your post



#29 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,565 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 01 March 2014 - 09:39 PM

Well, then, just leave the task of tsk-tsking  to the Mods. 


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#30 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 02 March 2014 - 12:18 AM

bored each time read off-topic when got a notification of new posts :(



#31 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,565 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 02 March 2014 - 01:52 PM

Change notifications.


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#32 OFFLINE   DJZack

DJZack

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 44 posts
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Posted 04 March 2014 - 01:29 PM

I do agree. Trying to watch the Sundance Channel is just about unbearable


Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk

#33 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 04 March 2014 - 01:41 PM

Mr LaxGuy ? Would you provide current numbers of currently allocated bandwidth for Sundance channel ?



#34 OFFLINE   mrro82

mrro82

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 629 posts
  • LocationThumb web of the mitten :>)
Joined: Sep 11, 2012

Posted 04 March 2014 - 04:10 PM

Sundance having The Returned and now The Red Road HD would be amazing but the shows are good enough where I can bear the SD.

Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!

Edited by mrro82, 04 March 2014 - 04:10 PM.


#35 OFFLINE   lipcrkr

lipcrkr

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 285 posts
Joined: Apr 27, 2012

Posted 04 March 2014 - 07:02 PM

I only watch HD channels but would love Sundance in HD. Perhaps DirecTV could broadcast Sundance  in HD while carrying the Kartrashian...er...i mean "E" channel in SD only. Or maybe have "E" AND TLC in SD only..........that might free up some bandwidth for Sundance HD.



#36 OFFLINE   mrro82

mrro82

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 629 posts
  • LocationThumb web of the mitten :>)
Joined: Sep 11, 2012

Posted 04 March 2014 - 07:06 PM

With the "weather" channel going away there's bandwidth right there.

Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!

#37 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,565 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 04 March 2014 - 08:12 PM

With the "weather" channel going away there's bandwidth right there.

Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!

Not exactly. TWC  has been replaced by another weather channel. 


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#38 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,135 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 04 March 2014 - 08:55 PM

That other weather channel existed at the same time as TWC at one point, so there's enough bandwidth for both.

Also on my cable ClearQAM input, their 10 SD MPEG2 channels in 6 MHz of bandwidth look amazing compared to what DirecTV is achieving (or lack of achieving) in 4 times the bandwidth.

- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD, Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#39 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 04 March 2014 - 09:52 PM

That other weather channel existed at the same time as TWC at one point, so there's enough bandwidth for both.

Also on my cable ClearQAM input, their 10 SD MPEG2 channels in 6 MHz of bandwidth look amazing compared to what DirecTV is achieving (or lack of achieving) in 4 times the bandwidth.

what bitrate of the mux ? is it 1024QAM ?



#40 OFFLINE   Laxguy

Laxguy

    Never say 'never'.

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 14,565 posts
  • LocationWinters, CA, between Napa and Sacramento
Joined: Dec 02, 2010

Posted 04 March 2014 - 10:43 PM

That other weather channel existed at the same time as TWC at one point, so there's enough bandwidth for both.

By that measure, you could add any number of channels, cutting out PPV, special sports multi-channels, (FB, BB, Hockey) etc. 

 

We cannot dictate how many channels are needed in reserve or semi-reserve; we cannot say how DIRECTV should assign them, can we? 


"Laxguy" means a guy who loves lacrosse.

#41 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,135 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 05 March 2014 - 11:58 AM

what bitrate of the mux ? is it 1024QAM ?


I haven't seen 1024QAM on cable yet, nor receivers that can handle that. Maybe someday, who knows.

It's 256QAM 38.8 Mbps.
10:1 compression MPEG2 CBR.

I use my ClearQAM tuner when there is severe rain fade or I can watch a third show (that is avail in ClearQAM) when the HR24 is busy recording two shows.

The picture quality straight to the TV for SD is night and day difference (for the better) on an equivalent SD channel compared to DirecTV.

- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD, Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#42 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 05 March 2014 - 01:30 PM

so, it's roughly 3-4 Mbps per channel versus DTV's 1-2 Mbps per channels ... that's make the difference in PQ



#43 OFFLINE   hasan

hasan

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,920 posts
  • LocationOgden, IA
Joined: Sep 22, 2006

Posted 13 March 2014 - 05:31 PM

I have a no clue where you get that from, I know no one who has replaced a TV with an Hi Definition one and simply because its a higher res have moved back further, even if its a larger TV.

And I am saying the quality of the detail in the Samsung 4k display that I have seen kicks Hi Definition's caboose I don't care how far away I sit. The detail of people in far off distances and buildings and so forth is incredible. The problem as usual will be if producers actually utilize the full ability of it. Frankly most Hi Definition could be a lot better than it is, but they don't use it to its fullest abilities anywhere really.

I think the point he was trying to make is that many people who upgrade from SD to HD sets sit way, way, way too far away from their HDTVs. So much so, that their eyes cannot possibly resolve the detail that the HDTV is currently trying to show them. My experience has been EXACTLY that with SD > HD upgrade customers in our area. It's not that they move back for the HDTV, it's that they have been sitting so far back with SD (so they don't see the scan lines), for so long, that they think that all they need to do is replace the SD with an HD TV and leave their sofa/chairs in the  exact same spot and they are doing fine. They aren't, but they don't know it. This is particularly true of many elder customers, at least in rural Iowa. 

 

Again, it's not that they have backed up, but rather, they haven't moved forward! I've dealt with hundreds of customers and the trend is obvious....sitting way too far back...not because anyone told them to move, but because no one told them to move forward to take advantage of what the display is actually capable of. To make matters even worse, I've had people say they can't see the difference between SD and HD, when it is being demonstrated to them on the spot. Now, that's some pretty bad discernment. Even when told what to look for (when the overall picture doesn't impress them), they often can't see it.

 

I'm not saying everyone is that indiscriminate, but I am saying a LOT of people who come from SD to HD in the beginning have no clue that they need to move forward. I did have someone today who needed my help setting things up get WOW'd by HDTV. He had been watching cable on channel 3 (RF MOD). I disconnected the cable setup and went directly to the HDTV and he was amazed, especially on the local hi-def channels. It made the trip worthwhile. The local cable company thought Channel 3 RF Mod resolution was just fine for these older folks. Fortunately, it wasn't and now they are having a great time.


Edited by hasan, 13 March 2014 - 05:38 PM.

...hasan, N0AN

SlimLine5-SWiMLNB/DECA/WHDVR
HR44-700, WD20EURX 2 TB eSATA/ThermalTake Max 5 Enclosure

HR24-200, WD20EVDS 2 TB eSATA/ThermalTake Dock
HR24-200, H21-200. Samsung UN60C6400 60" LED/LCD
DirecTV since 1995

#44 OFFLINE   slice1900

slice1900

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 3,847 posts
  • LocationIowa
Joined: Feb 14, 2013

Posted 13 March 2014 - 05:59 PM

Why should they move forward? They put their TV where they want to have it, and sit where they feel comfortable. It may look better if they're sitting 8' from a 50" TV, but if they're 18' away and not getting the full benefit of HD, should they redecorate to allow moving closer?

 

Would you argue that people who buy 4K TVs need to move even closer, and closer yet again when the 4K market is saturated and TV makers start trying to push 8K? People either won't have enough room to get off their couch without bumping their TV, or they'll need a TV screen so large they'll need to raise their ceilings to make it fit!


SL5, PI-6S, SA-6AL 3xSWM16, 21 H20-100, 1 H20-600, 7 H24-700/AM21


#45 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,269 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 13 March 2014 - 06:05 PM

Why should they move forward? They put their TV where they want to have it, and sit where they feel comfortable. It may look better if they're sitting 8' from a 50" TV, but if they're 18' away and not getting the full benefit of HD, should they redecorate to allow moving closer?

 

Would you argue that people who buy 4K TVs need to move even closer, and closer yet again when the 4K market is saturated and TV makers start trying to push 8K? People either won't have enough room to get off their couch without bumping their TV, or they'll need a TV screen so large they'll need to raise their ceilings to make it fit!

oh ! yeah ! sure !

 

in reality 60-70-80" TV  will fit to any room; just mount on a wall ;)



#46 OFFLINE   inkahauts

inkahauts

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 17,269 posts
Joined: Nov 13, 2006

Posted 13 March 2014 - 06:19 PM

I think the point he was trying to make is that many people who upgrade from SD to HD sets sit way, way, way too far away from their HDTVs. So much so, that their eyes cannot possibly resolve the detail that the HDTV is currently trying to show them. My experience has been EXACTLY that with SD > HD upgrade customers in our area. It's not that they move back for the HDTV, it's that they have been sitting so far back with SD (so they don't see the scan lines), for so long, that they think that all they need to do is replace the SD with an HD TV and leave their sofa/chairs in the exact same spot and they are doing fine. They aren't, but they don't know it. This is particularly true of many elder customers, at least in rural Iowa.

Again, it's not that they have backed up, but rather, they haven't moved forward! I've dealt with hundreds of customers and the trend is obvious....sitting way too far back...not because anyone told them to move, but because no one told them to move forward to take advantage of what the display is actually capable of. To make matters even worse, I've had people say they can't see the difference between SD and HD, when it is being demonstrated to them on the spot. Now, that's some pretty bad discernment. Even when told what to look for (when the overall picture doesn't impress them), they often can't see it.

I'm not saying everyone is that indiscriminate, but I am saying a LOT of people who come from SD to HD in the beginning have no clue that they need to move forward. I did have someone today who needed my help setting things up get WOW'd by HDTV. He had been watching cable on channel 3 (RF MOD). I disconnected the cable setup and went directly to the HDTV and he was amazed, especially on the local hi-def channels. It made the trip worthwhile. The local cable company thought Channel 3 RF Mod resolution was just fine for these older folks. Fortunately, it wasn't and now they are having a great time.


I haven't sold tvs in a few years but all the plasma and LCD a Eric we sold where always bigger than their previous tv unless their was a space it had to fit in. So most people we sold to where if anything in essence moving forward.

#47 OFFLINE   wilbur_the_goose

wilbur_the_goose

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,426 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 16 March 2014 - 07:54 AM

Back on topic.  There is no doubt that D* has killed SD.  I also have FiOS, and their SD looks amazing compared to D*.

 

So - what can D* do about it?   

1.  Drop the SD channels they're paid a little for.  Like all those 24x7 infomercial channels.

 

I really doubt D* makes much money telecasting those endless televangelist stations that seem to clone each other.  I doubt they make much money on "The Gem Network" (or whatever it's called).

 

2.  Put the Sundance SD feed on an HD transponder.

 

3.  Start moving SD channels to the HD birds.  Essentially incentivize customers to upgrade.


DirecTV customer since 1996


#48 OFFLINE   TheRatPatrol

TheRatPatrol

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 6,892 posts
  • LocationPhoenix, AZ
Joined: Oct 01, 2003

Posted 16 March 2014 - 11:24 AM

Back on topic.  There is no doubt that D* has killed SD.  I also have FiOS, and their SD looks amazing compared to D*.
 
So - what can D* do about it?   
1.  Drop the SD channels they're paid a little for.  Like all those 24x7 infomercial channels.
 
I really doubt D* makes much money telecasting those endless televangelist stations that seem to clone each other.  I doubt they make much money on "The Gem Network" (or whatever it's called).
 
2.  Put the Sundance SD feed on an HD transponder.
 
3.  Start moving SD channels to the HD birds.  Essentially incentivize customers to upgrade.


I have a better idea, why not just add the HD feeds?

#49 OFFLINE   slice1900

slice1900

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 3,847 posts
  • LocationIowa
Joined: Feb 14, 2013

Posted 16 March 2014 - 12:40 PM

Back on topic.  There is no doubt that D* has killed SD.  I also have FiOS, and their SD looks amazing compared to D*.

 

So - what can D* do about it?   

1.  Drop the SD channels they're paid a little for.  Like all those 24x7 infomercial channels.

 

I really doubt D* makes much money telecasting those endless televangelist stations that seem to clone each other.  I doubt they make much money on "The Gem Network" (or whatever it's called).

 

2.  Put the Sundance SD feed on an HD transponder.

 

3.  Start moving SD channels to the HD birds.  Essentially incentivize customers to upgrade.

 

I don't think they can drop those information/educational/religious channels. They must devote 4% of their capacity to "public interest" channels as a condition of their FCC license, similar to how a regular TV station has to offer a certain percentage of their broadcast hours (though I think many now fill the requirement with subchannels) So stuff like CSPAN, NASA, and those religious channels. I doubt the infomercial/shopping channels count there, but they probably pay Directv enough to make it worth their while. Hypothetically speaking, if the "Gem network" put up a different phone number on the feed provided to Directv so they knew what orders were coming from Directv customers, they could carry such channels on a commission basis rather than for a set fee.

 

http://transition.fc...9-Satellite.pdf

 

The best hope for the Sundance channel in HD, unless they get enough people calling that they decide to do it earlier, is for the new satellites to launch. The first one should be operational less than a year from now, and they'll have a ton more capacity and would be able to provide Sundance in HD. That doesn't guarantee they do, but one would think that with all that new capacity they'll add the remaining local markets not available in HD, and add maybe not all but many many channels they currently don't have in HD that have an HD feed available.

 

I think they'll start moving SD channels to 99/103 MPEG4 at some point, and will probably begin with channels that are watched less so they can slowly push people off SD. But whenever that day is, it'll certainly be after the next two satellites are launched and operational, since they need capacity for all those channels first.


SL5, PI-6S, SA-6AL 3xSWM16, 21 H20-100, 1 H20-600, 7 H24-700/AM21


#50 OFFLINE   harsh

harsh

    Beware the Attack Basset

  • Registered
  • 20,376 posts
  • LocationSalem, OR
Joined: Jun 14, 2003

Posted 16 March 2014 - 12:41 PM

1.  Drop the SD channels they're paid a little for.  Like all those 24x7 infomercial channels.

Any channel that they're paid to carry or must carry to satisfy FCC PI regulations is likely to be kept.

I really doubt D* makes much money telecasting those endless televangelist stations that seem to clone each other.  I doubt they make much money on "The Gem Network" (or whatever it's called).

While you can speculate all you want, what DIRECTV has actually done speaks volumes.

2.  Put the Sundance SD feed on an HD transponder.

They can't do this without screwing SD customers out of the ability to view the channel. That's not going to happen.

3.  Start moving SD channels to the HD birds.  Essentially incentivize customers to upgrade.

Same as above. There are a whole lot more SD customers than you care to imagine and moving their channels away isn't fair and it isn't going to make anyone happy; especially if they don't work to provide higher PQ.

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. -- JFK





Protected By... spam firewall...And...