Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Senate Panel Tackles Royalty Rates, Sat Legislation


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
No replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Chris Blount

Chris Blount

    Creator of DBSTalk

  • Administrators
  • 17,185 posts
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Posted 13 May 2004 - 05:17 AM

Copyright royalty rates satellite TV companies pay for superstation and distant network programming was the big issue at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on key satellite TV legislation Wednesday.

Satellite TV interests testifying before the panel expressed concern that those rates could see an increase, and questioned whether the rates are consistent with what cable pays for the same programming. The hearing, led by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman and Utah Republican Orrin Hatch, scrutinized Satellite Home Viewer Extension Act, which he introduced in January.

EchoStar CEO Charles Ergen said royalty rates satellite TV pays are higher than what cable is paying for the same programming. Uniform rates and a uniform method for adjusting rates would achieve parity between satellite and cable, he said.

DirecTV Vice Chairman Eddy Hartenstein said his company is concerned about any proposed increase in satellite TV royalty rates with no similar increase in the rates paid by cable operators. "We are deeply troubled by the prospect of programming rate increases, as well as by the prospect of participating in an admittedly flawed, distracting, and extremely expensive CARP (Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel) process – neither of which would apply to our chief competitors, the dominant cable operators," he said.

Hatch said there needs to be a reasonable adjustment of copyright royalty rates, and he endorsed the approach recently taken in the House Judiciary Committee, in which a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel would determine the rate, and it would then be subject to Congressionally-mandated discounts.

Fritz Attaway of the Motion Picture Association of America also said at the hearing there needs to be a copyright royalty rate adjustment that would fairly compensate program owners and not harm consumers. Attaway also disputed claims from satellite TV companies that they pay higher compulsory license royalties than cable systems.

Also during the hearing, Hatch said satellite TV providers should be allowed to deliver significantly viewed stations to subscribers in the same manner cable companies do to outside markets.

http://www.skyreport.com (Used with permission)

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...



Protected By... spam firewall...And...