Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

FCC Bureau Moves on 61.5-Degree DBS Issues


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
10 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Chris Blount

Chris Blount

    Creator of DBSTalk

  • Administrators
  • 17,176 posts
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Posted 06 December 2004 - 06:40 AM

The International Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission moved on issues concerning DBS spectrum last week, restricting use of a portion of one orbital location used by a handful of companies.

At issue is two unassigned DBS channels at 61.5 degrees, an orbital location used by EchoStar and VOOM from Cablevision and Rainbow DBS. Also, Dominion uses an EchoStar satellite to deliver its services from the orbital location, and has a license for DBS capacity at the slot.

The bureau released an order Friday that would prohibit companies with DBS operations at orbital locations capable of providing DBS service to all 50 states from acquiring, owning or controlling two channels currently available for licensing at the 61.5-degreee orbital location for four years. The order also covers any subsidiaries and entities those companies with full-CONUS operations control, the order said. Also, the bureau order would prohibit those same companies from leasing the channels during the same period.

"Because these channels are the only remaining unassigned DBS channels in the 12 GHz DBS band that could provide service to the Eastern half of the continental United States, we conclude that such a restriction on eligibility to use them will serve the public interest by helping to promote the development of an additional provider of DBS services," the bureau said in its order.

The bureau said Rainbow DBS, the licensee of 11 channels at 61.5 degrees, supported adoption of the eligibility criteria, and apparently the Cablevision unit had proposed the idea to the commission. However, EchoStar, which also is the licensee of 11 channels at the orbital location, opposed adoption of eligibility restrictions for the license for the two available channels, the bureau said.

http://www.skyreport.com (Used with permission)

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   djlong

djlong

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,188 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire
Joined: Jul 08, 2002

Posted 06 December 2004 - 07:41 AM

So exactly how is a company with 2 and only transponders supposed to compete with *anything*? How are they supposed to *develop* anything when they'll have, what, 20 channels tops to sell? or perhaps just 5 or so HDTV?

#3 OFFLINE   kenglish

kenglish

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSalt Lake City, Utah, USA
Joined: Oct 02, 2004

Posted 06 December 2004 - 09:38 AM

They could build an advertising-supported network of, maybe 10-12 channels. Any old DISH or DirecTV 18" dish, together with a $150 FTA receiver, would work for viewing.

Might be a great way to add some regional nets, some ethnic programming, or even some right-of-the-left, but left-of-the-right "semi-political" programming.

Of course, they could also do scrambled stuff, and charge for it, but that would add a lot of expensive infrastructure.

#4 OFFLINE   wcswett

wcswett

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 363 posts
Joined: Jan 07, 2003

Posted 06 December 2004 - 10:36 AM

So exactly how is a company with 2 and only transponders supposed to compete with *anything*? How are they supposed to *develop* anything when they'll have, what, 20 channels tops to sell? or perhaps just 5 or so HDTV?


Well, Sky Angel doesn't have too much more than that. I could see another specialty package, particularly ethnic or educational, created at that location and delivered under contract by EchoStar or Voom.

--- WCS
DISH RECEIVERS: 622(x2), 510, 211(x2)
PROGRAMMING: DISH HD Platinum, Atlanta locals
ANTENNAS: 61.5, 110, 119, 129

#5 OFFLINE   JohnH

JohnH

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 7,802 posts
Joined: Apr 22, 2002

Posted 06 December 2004 - 10:45 AM

http://www.dbstalk.c...ead.php?t=35877

#6 OFFLINE   LauderDave

LauderDave

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 39 posts
Joined: Jan 05, 2004

Posted 06 December 2004 - 09:14 PM

With orders like this, combined with the fact that the FCC already turned down E*'s attempt to buy D*, it sure seems like the FCC is determined to promote competition in the DBS realm. Did the piece mention that Cablevision supported the measure? And does anyone really expect them to keep propping up that money pit Voom? So, naturally they're looking out for their core business. The heavy handed lobbying of the cable industry is apparent in a number of the FCC's decisions over the last couple of years in reference to DBS providers. When will the FCC do something about the lack of competition in cable, since it's so worried about satellite competion?

#7 OFFLINE   BabaLouie

BabaLouie

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 79 posts
Joined: Apr 02, 2004

Posted 07 December 2004 - 05:17 PM

They could build an advertising-supported network of, maybe 10-12 channels. Any old DISH or DirecTV 18" dish, together with a $150 FTA receiver, would work for viewing.

Might be a great way to add some regional nets, some ethnic programming, or even some right-of-the-left, but left-of-the-right "semi-political" programming.

Of course, they could also do scrambled stuff, and charge for it, but that would add a lot of expensive infrastructure.


If I had some $$, I would love to get involved in putting something like this together--a platform for a few channels: educational, special interest, news, old classic tv shows, movies, kid's stuff, maybe some independent documentaries, sports programming, and new avenue for lower-budget original programming. It would be free to the viewer, and advertiser supported. Some of the channels could eventually go to HD. An alternative to what's out there already, but at the same time, a good addition to what's out there.

#8 OFFLINE   Jacob S

Jacob S

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 7,657 posts
Joined: Apr 14, 2002

Posted 07 December 2004 - 08:53 PM

That sounds pretty good. I bet one could even get away with charging a small fee for certain channels to receive them if it comes down to it and the cheap service would attract many to it, but offer several for free as well with the money generated from advertisement.

#9 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 39,511 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 29 December 2004 - 10:38 PM

Well, Sky Angel doesn't have too much more than that.

SkyAngel doesn't have ANY more than that. All of their channels are hosted on two transponders. They may "use" another transponder if the "a la carte" family friendly TV offering is started up. It would be E* channels sold to SA customers in a mini-pack.

I don't know what kind of nitch is available, but as long as the powers that be won't sell the spectrum to any of the current satellite providers it's open for whomever wants to make a grab.

BTW: SkyAngel remains elligible for the bandwidth, as their current spectrum assignments do not cover all 50 states. :D

JL

#10 OFFLINE   Nick

Nick

    Keep going - don't give up!

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 21,242 posts
  • LocationThe Beautiful Golden Isles of Coastal Georgia
Joined: Apr 23, 2002

Posted 31 December 2004 - 07:50 PM

Let Michael Moore get a couple more hack documentaries in the can, and we could have the "ABC" (Anti-Bush Channel), a 24/7 political rant against W. :D

(Word has it Jeb is considering running for the top job in 2008. The Bush dynasty (die-nasty?) rolls on...

.


~ 12 Year Anniversary Month ~
Charter Gold Club Member
DBSTalk Club ~ 21k Club
Top 10 Poster

.


#11 OFFLINE   Foxbat

Foxbat

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 207 posts
Joined: Aug 01, 2003

Posted 03 January 2005 - 09:55 PM

Let Michael Moore get a couple more hack documentaries in the can, and we could have the "ABC" (Anti-Bush Channel), a 24/7 political rant against W. :D

It's called FSTV, channel 9415.




spam firewall