Welcome to DBSTalk
- Start new topics and reply to others
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages to other members.
Reception in general
Posted 15 June 2002 - 08:08 PM
a. Q for anyone: Re reception, when using XM in the car and the signal is blocked by a bridge or mountain, and once the signal is recaptured, why is there then a dead echo? Seems like there is some sort of time shift delay in the reception, but not being a satellite junkie, it's not clear to me why this happens. Just curious.
b. Note: I drove up to Nova Scotia and Newfoundland last month and took along the XM. I had earlier asked XM tech support how far across the border did the signal stretch in the northeast, but I only got a standard legal line of 50 miles and everything complies with international broadcast rules etc. Anyway I got a strong signal clear across New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and out to Cape Breton. Only when we got to southern Newfoundland did the signal start to flutter; interestingly, it was ok at the lower channels and nil at the higher channels (anything above On Broadway, I think that's 23 or so), why?? As I drove further north and east, the limited reception then dwindled further. By the time I got to St. John's, I could barely bring in the preview channel on 4. Don't know if the limiting factor was the northerly or the easterly stretch, I think it was the latter.
C. Q's Just wondering...Does anyone have a footprint map of the XM satellite reception area and of the active repeater nodes? Also, what is the USB port on the Sony intended for??
D. General reaction...we have Xm for about half a year now, great reception and quality here in S Florida, listen in both home and car with Sony pnp model...Main gripe is the frequency of Xm promo's on the commercial stations. You have to wonder if these will flip over to paid advertising once the listener base hits some magic number, who knows when. Main concern is whether their positive cash flow point will happen soon enough to prevent them from burning through all the investment capital with what appears to be a hefty monthly operating overhead; meanwhile let's enjoy the good service.
Posted 15 June 2002 - 08:30 PM
what is the USB port on the Sony intended for??
All excellent questions, and I would love the answer to the above myself. Calls to Sony tell me that the XM USB kit is not available "yet"
So it appears its coming, but the question is what does it do?
Posted 16 June 2002 - 08:15 AM
Not having any detailed knowledge about satellite radio, I could venture a couple of guesses...
Higher channels might be at slightly higher frequencies (different transponder, unless XM uses only one transponder). Losses may be higher through the atmosphere, through your car window, and/or within your radio. The proposed higher transponder might even actually have a weaker signal. I imagine that it's frequently foggy, rainy, and/or drizzly in Atlantic Canada. This might tend to affect a higher frequency first.
Also, higher frequencies give a more focused beam, so perhaps the higher channels fall off more rapidly at the beam edges.
Of course, you realize you're getting a useful signal, way outside the XM supposed range. Don't let the Mounties hear you listening to a foreign US signal. It could be against Canadian law now! You should wait until Canada has its own satellite radio, and get a different receiver for use when traveling in Canada. (Just kidding, I hope.)
"a. Q for anyone: Re reception, when using XM in the car and the signal is blocked by a bridge or mountain, and once the signal is recaptured, why is there then a dead echo? Seems like there is some sort of time shift delay in the reception, but not being a satellite junkie, it's not clear to me why this happens. Just curious."
The audio channel is actually a digital data stream, which is buffered by your radio, so when the signal is lost and re-established, the buffer is at least partially emptied, and you have to wait for it to fill up again, before you hear anything new.
Posted 18 June 2002 - 02:38 PM
Posted 08 July 2002 - 09:51 AM
Originally posted by HornHonker
Here is a link to the XM footprints.
From the footprints it appears the satellites are not directly above the equator? I thought they were, since I think I've read something about being able to see the southern sky. Or are they using spot beams pointed at roughly Seattle and NYC?
Posted 08 July 2002 - 11:31 AM
Posted 08 July 2002 - 11:36 AM
Originally posted by RJS1111111
Those footprints look like very typical shaped CONUS beams to me...
What's the difference between a CONUS beam and a spot beam? Wider and more oblong?
Posted 09 July 2002 - 02:17 AM
Posted 09 July 2002 - 08:30 AM
Posted 07 August 2002 - 02:00 PM