Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Guest Message by DevFuse
Retailer Attorneys Push DirecTV Case
No replies to this topic
Posted 13 March 2002 - 04:08 AM
Attorneys representing satellite TV retailers fighting DirecTV said they were disappointed that a California judge didn't issue a preliminary injunction preventing the company from communicating with dealers about commissions and other pay issues.
Last week, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction against the satellite TV provider that would have prevented the company from amending sales agreements with its dealers.
"While I wish (the judge) would have granted our motion for preliminary injunction, her 'suggestions' to DirecTV accomplish much of what we had hoped to achieve with a preliminary injunction anyway," said Allen M. Stewart, counsel to the plaintiffs.
Among the recommendations made by the judge, as reported by attorneys representing the plaintiffs, was extending the deadline for DirecTV dealers to respond to a letter from the company proposing a new compensation structure.
On Monday, DirecTV spokesman Bob Marsocci said the company was "pleased but not surprised" by the judge's ruling on the preliminary injunction. DirecTV has a motion for dismissal of the class action case, which will be taken up by the court on March 26.
"As we've said before, this is nothing more than a transparent attempt by the plaintiffs' lawyers to leverage a settlement in advance of the proposed merger with a promise of a substantial payday for themselves," Marsocci said.
The lawsuit alleges that DirecTV agreed to pay retailers commissions on new subscriber installations as well as residual monthly income based on a subscriber's monthly payments. The plaintiffs allege that DirecTV is withholding past and present commissions and residual payments, and are seeking more than $300 million in damages.
From <a href="http://www.skyreport.com" target=none>SkyReport</A> (Used with permission)