Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Blackouts- Have they out lived their usefulness?
Posted 26 March 2005 - 04:28 PM
Posted 26 March 2005 - 06:31 PM
However, there have also been complaints as to how the stations have handled the out-of-market games and how it has caused complaints with subscribers to NFL Sunday Ticket.
"In an effort to increase your cable and satellite bills beyond the point of affordability and to further pad the pockets of our executives..."
Check out my list of links.
Posted 26 March 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posted 27 March 2005 - 05:33 PM
At worst, here "gravy" means "additional profit". A properly run business, such as a good sports team, should maximize profit.
In the NFL, gate revenue, although split with the visiting team, is gravy. The television money has always been shared equally
The idea that attendance is not entirely based on team success neither supports nor refutes the notion that some folks would not buy game tickets if they could watch the game on TV.
(A blackout) certainly does nothing to improve attendance, as evidenced by the 49ers, and Jaguars. San Francisco has been terrible, yet continues to sell out, while Jacksonville, a relatively new and successful franchise, continues to struggle to sell tickets.
In a chunk too big to quote, he suggests that the added ticket and concession revenue of extra fans in the stands would be offset by increased TV revenue if the game were telecast. However, as he mentioned earlier, the regular-season TV money gets split evenly, so each local team would get only a tiny slice of any extra broadcast revenues. and equal slices would go to those teams that already pack the stands. Besides, the argument would require reworking the TV contract, somehow bringing in extra money from the networks in exchange for lifting this blackout restriction.
Finally, I'm most sensitive to his question:
Except that (a) fans are already guaranteed to have at least half of their teams' games available, and ( under the current blackout rules, NFL fandom has grown to the point of making it the most popular sport in America.
Don’t the owners realize that by limiting exposure they’re tuning out the next generation of fans?
Blackouts are no fun, but I don't think viewers have a right to watch every local game on TV for free.
Posted 27 March 2005 - 10:13 PM