Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

DirecTV Slapped with Injunction on Dealer Case


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
No replies to this topic

#1 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Guests
Joined: --

Posted 04 March 2002 - 06:38 AM


A California Superior Court judge entered a temporary restraining order prohibiting DirecTV from engaging in certain conduct with DirecTV dealers until the court holds a preliminary injunction hearing on March 8.

The order, as reported by the Los Angeles law firm of Baron & Budd, prohibits DirecTV from communicating with retailers regarding "amendments to the sales agency agreements or ... altering or modifying or enforcing purported alterations or modifications of the sales agency agreements" until the March 8 hearing.

The order was entered in a lawsuit, filed last October, which alleges that DirecTV is withholding compensation from present and former DirecTV retailers by using accounting methods designed to underpay and overcharge dealers. More than 11,000 DirecTV retailers are affected, said Allen M. Stewart, counsel to the plaintiffs and a shareholder in Baron & Budd.

"DirecTV has knowingly and systematically driven independent DirecTV dealers out of business by unilaterally changing the payment terms of the agreement with a take-it-or-leave-it approach," Stewart said. "DirecTV continually pressured the dealers to either take a bad deal or be terminated as a dealer."

The lawsuit alleges that DirecTV agreed to pay retailers commissions on new subscriber installations, as well as residual monthly income based on the subscribers' monthly payments. The plaintiffs allege that DirecTV is withholding past and present dealers' commissions and residual payments and seeks more than $300 million in damages.

In response, DirecTV said attorneys representing retailers in the case are "attempting to leverage a settlement, which they hope will result in tens of millions of dollars of profit for themselves."

The company added, "attorneys representing the plaintiffs in this case have been urging other independent dealers to hop on the bandwagon and join the legal action because of the planned merger with EchoStar. The lawyers sent a letter to retailers last month claiming that 'oftentimes, mergers of this nature result in the conclusion of outstanding litigation matters' and 'we believe acting promptly may increase our chances of a successful outcome.'"

DirecTV said the court "clearly has concerns" about the lack of evidence, among other things, and has asked for a more in-depth briefing from both sides on March 8. "The court expressly stated that it was not making any finding that DirecTV had intimidated retailers or acted coercively," the company said.

From <a href="http://www.skyreport.com" target=none>SkyReport</a> (Used with permission)


...Ads Help To Support This SIte...



Protected By... spam firewall...And...