Welcome to DBSTalk
- Start new topics and reply to others
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages to other members.
622 and storage
Posted 30 January 2006 - 04:36 PM
So to answer your question. Is Mpeg programming recorded or packaged in mpeg4 before transmission. The answer is "That is the plan" and the direction Dish is moving towards. However, the they are not seeing the desired compression wins with current MPEG4 encoders today so this move will be slowly.
As to encapsulating MPEG-2 into mpeg-4 to get better compression. The only way I could see this occuring is to decompression the MPEG-2 stream and feed it into MPEG-4. I doubt anyone is doing this and I really dont see any benefit doing it this way.
Posted 30 January 2006 - 04:39 PM
I'm not a digital video expert, so somebody correct me if I'm wrong here... I don't believe that there is any way to "encapsulate" MPEG2 within MPEG4; they are two different compression schemes. Any transcoding process that I've seen has first decoded the MPEG2 to raw uncompressed video and then reencoded it as MPEG4. On the same note, I don't know of any way to convert MPEG4 to MPEG2 without uncompressing the video and recompressing.
This is how I understand it and my understanding is that Dish takes the stream coming in from the Sat and lays it onto the disk. Is it in pure MPEG2, I doubt it and we are starting to wonder into Hack talk so lets leave it as that.
Posted 30 January 2006 - 04:52 PM
So if it's currently in mpeg2 on the HD it'll still be in mpeg2 on the HD when we view, just mpeg4 during transmission to save space? does that make sense at all?
The receivers do not process the stream at all prior to recording to HD. If the stream comes MPEG2, it is recorded MPEG2. If it's MPEG4, it's recorded MPEG4.
Posted 30 January 2006 - 05:38 PM
The rumor around the water cooler is incorrect.
a friend I have at Dish told me today that from what he's been told at work there is no record time difference for mpeg2 and 4, as the compression is for transmission, not for storage.
That may well be the case if MPEG4 doesn't currently yield any appreciable savings. What gets recorded is a video stream; regardless of the transport protocol. In fact, all programming you watch on a Dish DVR has already been recorded and is playing off of the hard drive!
so his usderstanding is that we would see no difference in space needed for what we record.
Sending a JPEG file via FTP doesn't make it an FTP file. I would ask that nobody bring up the MPEG2 wrapper issue again as it only creates an issue where one doesn't exist.
This would be a very popular option indeed. Hopefully this has more credibility than the other rumor. Next project: being able to transcode existing recordings to full MPEG4 compression (maybe if we say it enough, it will sink in).
they are looking to make VOD capable of being disabled since so many requests have come in for that
Posted 30 January 2006 - 11:28 PM
so, whether or not there is a space benefit to mpeg4 currently is more a product of the compression algerythms needing some work to become more efficient? that makes sense if i think of if the way video drivers make a video card faster by becoming more efficient in their handling of graphics data
regardless of how it all works, 30 hours is better than 23 or so hours
Dish VIP622, 4/4/06; ex 921 owner, 2/04 to 3/06
Dish 501 (soon to upgrade to 722)
HD OTA (Washington DC): WRC-DT 1&2, WTTG-DT, WJLA-DT 1&2, WUSA-DT 1&2, WETA-DT 1-4, WBDC-DT 1&2, MHz 1-4, ION 1-7, WDCA-DT, and others i don't care about
Posted 02 February 2006 - 04:23 AM