Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Another Government Sponsored Fiasco


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 31 July 2006 - 11:17 AM

I thought this settop box coupon thing was too complex to administer when it was proposed. Now that it's law, the 'Ifs - Ands - Buts' provisos are becoming untenable:

http://www.multichan...?display=Policy

Why not give everyone a one time $40 tax credit when proof of purchase is enclosed in their tax 2009 return?

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   kenglish

kenglish

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSalt Lake City, Utah, USA
Joined: Oct 02, 2004

Posted 07 August 2006 - 06:38 AM

"J.H. Snider, a digital TV analyst at the New American Foundation in Washington, D.C., said the ban on pay TV home participation and possible income tests could prove meaningless because there is no penalty in the law for violating NTIA’s restrictions."

Sort of like the SHVA and the "moving" problem :) .

#3 OFFLINE   Olevia37HD

Olevia37HD

    Banned User

  • Banned User
  • 199 posts
Joined: Jul 12, 2006

Posted 07 August 2006 - 07:30 AM

Wow a Government Sponsored Fiasco and Department of Homeland Security isn't involved!!!!! :eek2:




spam firewall