Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Winipcfg in Windows 98 SE
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:03 AM
I noticed that winipcfg is by default looking at the PP adapter not the USB adapter Ia m now using. Any thoughts on how to get it to chnage that?
||...Ads Help To Support This Site...||
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:44 AM
Don't remember if this works under 98, but try on a good and the problem machine...
IPCONFIG /All >dbstalk.txt
and post both text files here.
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:41 PM
Command does not work on 98 SE
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:42 PM
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:44 PM
Try removing "TCP/IP->adapter", rebooting, and adding TCP/IP again.
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:54 PM
Posted 20 December 2002 - 07:57 AM
neil dot derryberry at gmail dot com
Posted 20 December 2002 - 11:12 AM
Posted 20 December 2002 - 11:22 AM
Posted 22 December 2002 - 06:01 PM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 10:01 AM
Windows Home Server, 2 TB storage, Gigabit LAN
Posted 23 December 2002 - 11:15 AM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 11:52 AM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 01:20 PM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 09:43 PM
I appreciate all the suggestions.
Posted 23 December 2002 - 09:55 PM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 11:32 PM
Posted 23 December 2002 - 11:56 PM
Originally posted by James_F
I don't know what to say. I've never had any luck with windows 98. We just never got off on the right foot.
I used Win98 quite a bit. Never really had problems, kept the patches/service packs up to data as much as I could. But Having worked thru all versions of Win32, I'd be happy with 2000 and XP and forget the old stuff.
Posted 24 December 2002 - 12:01 AM
Originally posted by Zac
I never did understand the point in releasing Me though? Why not a 2000 Home? That's what made no sense to me. Why did Microsoft keep adding to the buggy junk that was Win9x...
Compatibility issues with very old apps. For example I have some DOS games (Steel Panthers I, II & III) They use a DOS extensionand it is rather unstable under NT/2000/XP Home & Pro. They were planning on making ME a real NT/2000 based OS but tooo many apps required tooo much time to get running and tooo many would not run. In an office environment you can kind of force the upgrading (as everything is depreciated over 3-5 years it is not out of the question for MS to say If you want A you have to upgrade to B and get a positive response) But it seemed that the home users were not going to make the jump. So they waited 2 more years, XP had the same issues of compatibiity but they assume that most apps by now people use are Win95 based or better and XP will handle that better. All a matter of timing for what people would consider acceptable to lose their old
apps requiring replacement.
Luckily for me Steel Panthers I was abandoned by the original vendor and a group of devoted developers came up with a Win95/98/ME/2000/XP compatible upgrade that works great. I only play 3 games and they were all pre Windows 95. Right now I can actually play 2 of them on XP
Posted 24 December 2002 - 12:11 AM