Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Have you had to return your HR20 for a replacement?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
99 replies to this topic

Poll: Have you had to return your HR20 for a replacement? (165 member(s) have cast votes)

Have you had to return your HR20 for a replacement?

  1. I have not had to return my HR20. (106 votes [64.24%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 64.24%

  2. I have had to return my HR20 and received a replacement. (59 votes [35.76%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.76%

Vote

#61 OFFLINE   finaldiet

finaldiet

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,158 posts
Joined: Jun 13, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:26 PM

Have 2 with no problems since Feb.

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#62 OFFLINE   bto4wd

bto4wd

    Duplicate User (Account Closed)

  • Topic Starter
  • Banned User
  • 522 posts
Joined: Apr 17, 2007

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:33 PM

It's starting to read to me that you have a certain point you're trying to make ... By not excluding the abnormal return rates from rollout in August 2006 through February 2007, you are skewing the results and it may be very easy to dismiss the poll results, despite the point you're trying to make.

I'm guessing you're not looking to establish the current state of reliability for the HR20 ...

There's a limit to what you can do with a poll here. How would you suggest a poll be worded so that it didn't include those that were told to return a unit because "at that time that's what the CSRs did".

When I started this I didn't have a point to make. I was just plain curious. Then some started adding the "qualifications" that the return rate could be inflated due to past CSR procedures.

You can't exclude everything from 08/06 through 02/07 as there were real returns.

But again, to stop poor public opinion of the HR20, D* made the decision to replace units instead of telling the public that they screwed up and there was nothing currently available to fix their units. Why should those returned units be excluded from this poll when it was a D* decision to have them returned?
HR20-100
HR20-700
DTivos

#63 OFFLINE   blacker

blacker

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 39 posts
Joined: Aug 20, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:47 PM

I have 2. i got the first one in September 2006 and it had a bad Hard drive on it.. no big deal hard drives fail all the time.. replacement has worked great along with my second hr20 that is about 6 months old..

Dustin
* HR20-700 (System 1) - hdmi = Samsung LNT5265F 52-inch 1080p LCD HDTV | Networked

* HR20-700 (System 2) - hdmi = Samsung LNT4061F 40-inch 1080p LCD HDTV | Networked

* HR20-700 (System 3) - hdmi = Sharp Aquos LC32D62U 32-inch 1080p LCD HDTV | Slingbox Pro | Networked

* HR20-700 (System 4) - hdmi = Toshiba 19LV505 19-inch 720p LCD HDTV

#64 OFFLINE   sshams95

sshams95

    Legend

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 240 posts
Joined: Sep 02, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:55 PM

Out of two, had to return one due to bad tuner 2. Turned to be a blessing: went from HR20-100 to HR20-700! Was able to take advantage of CE's finally.

Keeping an eye on my second HR20-100 though. Wife uses it mainly and claims remote and buttons on receiver freeze up at least once a day. she has to do a RBR each time to get it working again.

#65 OFFLINE   waynebtx

waynebtx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,461 posts
  • LocationKingsville,Texas
Joined: Dec 24, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:55 PM

Have had the same HR20-700 since Dec 06.

Wayne

Slimline dish SWIM16
Sharp LC-60E78UN
HD-A30 w/ Harmony 880
HR34-700/AM21 w/ Harmony 880.
1 C31-700

HR44-200

HR24-100

H25-100

Marantz NR1603 A/V 7.1

All Wired Networked
Xbox 360
retired USN , retired Boeing, retired L3COM, just plain tired


#66 OFFLINE   shendley

shendley

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,723 posts
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Posted 23 July 2007 - 09:57 PM

I just returned my very first HR20 last week because of what I thought was a failing tuner. From what I've been seeing since then, it appears I was wrong and something else was/is going on. So I'm not sure how to vote. I returned one but it appears I really didn't need to.

AU9, SWM8
Panasonic TH-58PX60U, HDMI to HR44-100, Native, DD, HDMI to Pioneer VSX-1123-k Receiver, Harmony One, Networked with Ethernet Cable, 35/4 Mbps DSL.
Panasonic TH-42PD50U, Component to HR 24-100, Antec MX-1 w. WD10EVDS ESata, Native, DD, DTV Remote.
Panasonic TC-L32X2, HDMI to C41-100, DTV Remote.
Whole Home.


#67 OFFLINE   Tom Robertson

Tom Robertson

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,252 posts
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Posted 23 July 2007 - 10:10 PM

There's a limit to what you can do with a poll here. How would you suggest a poll be worded so that it didn't include those that were told to return a unit because "at that time that's what the CSRs did".

When I started this I didn't have a point to make. I was just plain curious. Then some started adding the "qualifications" that the return rate could be inflated due to past CSR procedures.

You can't exclude everything from 08/06 through 02/07 as there were real returns.

But again, to stop poor public opinion of the HR20, D* made the decision to replace units instead of telling the public that they screwed up and there was nothing currently available to fix their units. Why should those returned units be excluded from this poll when it was a D* decision to have them returned?


All comes down to a couple of things:
  • What do you really want to measure?
  • What do you really want to determine?
  • How do you really want to try to be perceived?
My current perception is you don't want to really see where the HR20 is at. Like Drew2k, I feel you have developed a point you want to get across rather than truly investigate meaningful data. That's ok, you are welcome to express your feelings and options. I'm happy to share my thoughts and happy to listen to your thoughts. Hopefully we'll accomplish some good things along the way.

Cheers,
Tom

Go Packers!

My real treasures: 5 Grandchildren - S, D, M, M, C ; Now 5! Great-Grandtibbers - B, H, J, A, and M (Born 7/31/2011)


#68 OFFLINE   LR308er

LR308er

    Duplicate User (Account Closed)

  • Banned User
  • 310 posts
Joined: Jun 27, 2007

Posted 23 July 2007 - 10:40 PM

If a ball player enters the majors, his lifetime stats start at that moment.
If he has a rough rookie year, he has the rest of his career to make up ground on the numbers, but he dosen't get a mulligan because he joined the big leagues before he was ready.

When I'm considering a product, I want to know its lifetime stats, not just what its done lately.

Let's face it. These forums hold two basic kinds of customers.
Saitisfied and loyal enthusiasts and dissatisfied customers who came here looking for answers.

Because of these circumstances, one poll or another will always seem biased or unfair to the other side of the fence.

I came here looking for answers, but I've also learned a lot and am becoming an enthusiast. Not so much a HR20 enthusiast, because I got mine in Feb. and I'm waiting for its replacement to come in the mail this week.

Who knows? After a year or two of flawless performance, I may hop the fence altogether.
Favorite Quotes:
"Don't fry bacon naked" - Janet Campbell (circa 1995)
"My head do stink" - Tommy Early (2003)
"Ya'll ain't got no more money?!" - Exotic Dancer (2004)

#69 OFFLINE   mluntz

mluntz

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 641 posts
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 10:54 PM

Replaced mine. Bad tuner.
DirecTV Customer since 1995
Directv/ HD-DVR HR20-700
Directv/ HD-DVR HR24-500 (2)
H24-700
Slimline 5 Dish
Premiere package holder
NFL Sunday Ticket Subscriber

#70 OFFLINE   Doug Brott

Doug Brott

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 28,919 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles
Joined: Jul 12, 2006

Posted 23 July 2007 - 11:05 PM

There's a limit to what you can do with a poll here. How would you suggest a poll be worded so that it didn't include those that were told to return a unit because "at that time that's what the CSRs did".

When I started this I didn't have a point to make. I was just plain curious. Then some started adding the "qualifications" that the return rate could be inflated due to past CSR procedures.

You can't exclude everything from 08/06 through 02/07 as there were real returns.

But again, to stop poor public opinion of the HR20, D* made the decision to replace units instead of telling the public that they screwed up and there was nothing currently available to fix their units. Why should those returned units be excluded from this poll when it was a D* decision to have them returned?


I don't think that there is anyone here that would suggest that DIRECTV didn't have issues that absolutely needed to be corrected in late 2006. This site played a part in getting the engine at DIRECTV turned around and guess what .. the HR20 is a much better product now. Yes, there are some things missing, like Dual Live Buffers, but taken as a whole, the HR20 is a nice receiver.

To this day, DIRECTV continues to make improvements to the HR20. Just today the most recent software release for the HR20-700 was made available. While knowing the past is informative, there is a known point in which the data you are attempting to collect is simply wrong. What happened was a mistake on DIRECTV's part and that mistake was corrected. Yes, there were legitimate hardware issues that would have necessitated a return, but there is literally no way to break out that data as the bulk of the returns at the time were unrelated to hardware problems. Since February, however, your question makes more sense because the collected data would be much more accurate.
DIRECTV Firmware Monitor - iPhone - Android - HTML5

DIRECTV employee since August 2011.
All comments are my own. Unless specifically stated, my views do NOT represent the views of DIRECTV

#71 OFFLINE   Tom Robertson

Tom Robertson

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,252 posts
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Posted 23 July 2007 - 11:15 PM

If a ball player enters the majors, his lifetime stats start at that moment.
If he has a rough rookie year, he has the rest of his career to make up ground on the numbers, but he dosen't get a mulligan because he joined the big leagues before he was ready.

When I'm considering a product, I want to know its lifetime stats, not just what its done lately.

Let's face it. These forums hold two basic kinds of customers.
Saitisfied and loyal enthusiasts and dissatisfied customers who came here looking for answers.

Because of these circumstances, one poll or another will always seem biased or unfair to the other side of the fence.

I came here looking for answers, but I've also learned a lot and am becoming an enthusiast. Not so much a HR20 enthusiast, because I got mine in Feb. and I'm waiting for its replacement to come in the mail this week.

Who knows? After a year or two of flawless performance, I may hop the fence altogether.


Players can't have a mediocre first year, change a few things under a good coach, have a great couple years and sign a monster bonus? :)

I guess I don't understand how knowing the first 4 months of a product's life is really applicable to your experience if you didn't suffer thru those first four months yourself. YP(erception)MV, I guess.

Cheers,
Tom

Go Packers!

My real treasures: 5 Grandchildren - S, D, M, M, C ; Now 5! Great-Grandtibbers - B, H, J, A, and M (Born 7/31/2011)


#72 ONLINE   veryoldschool

veryoldschool

    Lifetime Achiever

  • Moderators
  • 41,859 posts
Joined: Dec 09, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 12:13 AM

I've only had mine for 4 weeks, but wondering how many have had to get replacement units?

So what are you really wanting to find out with this poll?
The horror stories of last fall or what you might expect out of your four week old DVR?
If it's the latter, then I'd say it would be like most electronics, if it makes it through the initial burn-in time without failure, then you should be good to go for a long time.
You have 90 days of free service calls & replacements if yours fails or there is some problem with your install.
After that time you shouldn't have a problem under normal use.
The units are made in Mexico & China, both plants have had some problems.
I have no idea of what the numbers are [percentages, or yields]. I just try to keep track of trends that look like bad "batches" for a specific problem.
A.K.A VOS

#73 OFFLINE   Drew2k

Drew2k

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 13,784 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 04:33 AM

There's a limit to what you can do with a poll here. How would you suggest a poll be worded so that it didn't include those that were told to return a unit because "at that time that's what the CSRs did".

Polls can be multiple choice and can have many options - I've done a poll with 20 options. Here's an example that could be used here:

Multiple choice poll: Have you had to return one or more HR20s in the time spans shown?

YES (08/2006 through 09/2006)
YES (10/2006 through 11/2006)
YES (12/2006 through 01/2007)
YES (02/2006 through 03/2007)
YES (04/2006 through 05/2007)
YES (06/2006 through 07/2007)
NO (08/2006 through 09/2006)
NO (10/2006 through 11/2006)
NO (12/2006 through 01/2007)
NO (02/2006 through 03/2007)
NO (04/2006 through 05/2007)
NO (06/2006 through 07/2007)


By reducing this to two month time-spans, we could see trends and apply meaning to the results.


EDITED: I posted an updated "sample" poll later in this thread, with options to capture when the user obtained the HR20.

#74 OFFLINE   braven

braven

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,033 posts
Joined: Apr 09, 2007

Posted 24 July 2007 - 04:46 AM

Ours has been flawless since April. I should probably find some wood to knock on. ha ha
HR34, HR24, (2) H21's
Whole Home DVR

@I_am_Braven

#75 OFFLINE   paulman182

paulman182

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,838 posts
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 04:59 AM

That's an interesting way of looking at it. Especially considering the fact that many of the features and gui changes are the product of feedback from these forums.
if the forums are not a true representative of all users, then why are the forums making the decisions that affect all users?


There is no way a forum such as this is a real cross-section of all users.

Or, more precisely, there is no way to know if it is or not.

But it probably does reflect the views of the more demanding users, as it requires interest and effort to log in and voice opinions.

It is probably accurate to say, if the more demanding users are satisfied, most people will be.

P.S. I am not a demanding user! Except for occasional lockups last fall, I have no real complaints.

Equipment includes a buncha stuff that I no longer have interest in detailing


#76 OFFLINE   Ronv

Ronv

    Legend

  • Registered
  • 155 posts
Joined: May 29, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 05:13 AM

I have not had to return my 2 HR20 I've had since Sept. 06.


HR24-500 - HDMI 6' cable to-> Visio 55" LCD -Resolution: 1080i Only
| Cyber Power UPS | Philips HTS3565D/37 DVD HTS |
Native: Off| Dolby Digital: On | OTA: no| Networked: Yes
-Standby: Every Night | BBC's Connected | Software- 0x59e
-Slimline 3lnb Dish | No multiswitch
-HR24-500 (in the barn)
-DirecTV since 1994

_______________________________________


#77 OFFLINE   spoonman

spoonman

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 869 posts
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Posted 24 July 2007 - 05:28 AM

The hard drive went in the first one I had. I had the unit for about a month.
Setup: SWMline
HR21-700 (Native On) | OTA W/AM21 | HDMI to Onkyo TX-SR706 then to Magnavox 52" via HDMI | networked
HR20-700 (Native On) | HDMI to Sharp 32" Aquos | networked
HR20-700 (Native On) | HDMI to Sony Reciever (STR-DG1000) then to Vizio 32" | networked

#78 OFFLINE   Drew2k

Drew2k

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 13,784 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 05:33 AM

Polls can be mutiple choice and can have many options - I've done a poll with 20 options. Here's an example that could be used here:

I'm revising my "sample" poll to group the time spans, expand the question, and also account for those who didn't own any HR20s during each time span.

Multiple choice poll: For each time period, choose A, B, or C. Have you had to return one or more HR20s in the time spans shown?

1A. 8/2006 - 9/2006: YES
1B. 8/2006 - 9/2006: NO
1C. 8/2006 - 9/2006: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period
2A. 10/2006 - 11/2006: YES
2B. 10/2006 - 11/2006: NO
2C. 10/2006 - 11/2006: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period
3A. 12/2006 - 1/2007: YES
3B. 12/2006 - 1/2007: NO
3C. 12/2006 - 1/2007: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period
4A. 2/2007 - 3/2007: YES
4B. 2/2007 - 3/2007: NO
4C. 2/2007 - 3/2007: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period
5A. 4/2007 - 5/2007: YES
5B. 4/2007 - 5/2007: NO
5C. 4/2007 - 5/2007: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period
6A. 6/2007 - 7/2007: YES
6B. 6/2007 - 7/2007: NO
6C. 6/2007 - 7/2007: N/A - Didn't own any HR20s in this period

This more truly reflects the status of the poll respondents. In my case, I would choose N/A for 1, 2, and 3, and would then choose NO for the rest.

#79 OFFLINE   smiller

smiller

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 9 posts
Joined: Jun 20, 2007

Posted 24 July 2007 - 06:12 AM

Upgraded to 1 HR20-100 and 2 H20's early June. All failed next day after install! HR20 would not power up. All were replaced. Have 1 H20 now that does not like it's access card. The remote for the HR20 when used in RF mode is very erratic. CSR said to reset remote. Sometimes needs to be reset daily. Needless to say, I'm not impressed with the quality of these units.

#80 OFFLINE   ksninew

ksninew

    KS9W

  • Registered
  • 27 posts
Joined: Sep 30, 2006

Posted 24 July 2007 - 06:43 AM

On my 3rd HR20-700 since 11/06. The installer couldn't get the first one to work
out of the box, The 2nd HR20 worked greart until OTA was enabled and found out the OTA tuner-2 was dead.




Protected By... spam firewall...And...