Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
Guest Message by DevFuse
EchoStar needs to clear hurdles
1 reply to this topic
Posted 06 November 2001 - 08:21 PM
LITTLETON, Colo. (CBS.MW) -- It wasn't long ago that Charlie Ergen was making the same claims against DirecTV that others are about to make against him.
In February 2000, Ergen's EchoStar Communications filed suit against its larger rival in the satellite television game, charging that DirecTV threatened retailers into muscling EchoStar's Dish Network service out of the marketplace.
EchoStar charged DirecTV and its parent, Hughes Electronics, with violating "federal and state antitrust laws in order to protect its market share," according to EchoStar's 2000 annual report.
Now Ergen wants to buy Hughes, and he faces the embarrassing prospect of having to do an about-face in front of regulators. Among the inquiries he faces: "You said it was unacceptable for there to be one satellite service offered at electronics superstores. Why is it OK now?"
To read me please click HERE
||...Ads Help To Support This Site...||
Posted 07 November 2001 - 12:00 AM
It will be relatively easy to answer that one. Predatory practices in attempt to limit a competitor is an anti-trust violation. The same might hold true if there was a HOSTILE bid by one DBS company to absorb the other. But in htis case it is a cooperative, vountary merger. There is no attempt by one to put the other out of business.
Whether or not the E* suit had merit will never be deteremined as the suit is now dismissed by agreement.