Welcome to DBSTalk
Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
- Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
- Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
- Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
- Customize your profile page and make new friends
DirecTV Approaches FCC on Two-Dish Locals
Posted 05 February 2003 - 12:47 AM
DISH Network could and probably should build a bigger spotbeam satellite for 110. Perhaps they should build 2 which together would allow the use of 3 or 4 uplink locations. This could greatly increase the capability to carry all channels for a particular DMA at the same location.
||...Ads Help To Support This Site...||
Posted 05 February 2003 - 01:41 AM
Originally posted by Jacob S
How can DirecTv have all of those locals at one orbital slot and Dish has to use more than one orbital slot to fill in just as many locals? DirecTv is going to have 100 locals by the end of the year I hear, are they going to use the same orbital slot to do this? If they can do this how come can Dish not do this? How is DirecTv doing this and how come is Dish not doing this?
DirecTV had the advantage of all transponders on 101, it gives them more uplink capacity. This allowed them to build a spot beam satellite with more spots on it. They have 44 spot frequencies (in 26 spots) vs echostar having 25 spot beam frequencies in 15 spots. E* now has 2 of these satellites up now for 50 spot frequencies, D* has one with 44 now and another about to launch with perhaps 14 spot frequencies (they do not have the capacity at 119 that they have at 101). So, D* could end up with 58 spots. This gives D* 16% more LIL capacity. Plus D* pushes the error correction edge a bit more giving them 5% more capacity per spot. All in all D* probably will have effectively 11 more transponders for LIL than E* will have on the main slots. Dish is currently using about 15 TPs on wings for LIL channels, so it balances.
Posted 07 February 2003 - 05:34 PM
Since the spot sats are up and there was plenty of capacity to move stations off the side slots before they started adding new cities I think the FCC should revisit the issue. There is absolutely no reason for LA (for instance) to have any stations on a side slot. There is still a TP worth of space on LA's spots.
Posted 07 February 2003 - 08:19 PM
Also if Dish would be allowed to continue doing things as they are doing, then would this free up space for Direct to broadcast more cities if they were allowed to have some of the channels for a city on another slot?
I have to agree with Gary again