1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

3TB and 4TB Drives. The Danger!

Discussion in 'DIRECTV HD DVR/Receiver Discussion' started by Rich, Sep 30, 2012.

  1. Oct 7, 2012 #161 of 193
    P Smith

    P Smith Mr. FixAnything

    22,616
    241
    Jul 25, 2002
    W.Mdtrn Sea
    Oh, yeah. I forgot to note - WinXP Pro SP3 working fine with 4K sector size 3 TB drive in GoFlex enclosure.
     
  2. Oct 7, 2012 #162 of 193
    JonW

    JonW Icon

    526
    0
    Dec 21, 2006
    300GB was nice back when we were recording SD and that could hold 200+ hours, but if you record primarily HD, it fills up real fast. 3TB is actually a reasonable number for a HD DVR in my book.

    Alas, another problem is that the DVRs weren't designed with that much space in mind. It's not surprising that an MRV'd DVR with a combined playlist is going to get sluggish when those playlists can hold 10x the data originally intended.
     
  3. Oct 7, 2012 #163 of 193
    P Smith

    P Smith Mr. FixAnything

    22,616
    241
    Jul 25, 2002
    W.Mdtrn Sea
    I wouldn't say that blindly (but I would be glad to see blueprints of FW) at least what I saw: they does employ DB approach for store and update EPG and system info ...
     
  4. Oct 7, 2012 #164 of 193
    Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    28,285
    656
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    I'm afraid of D* taking over the external function. They haven't "blessed" any HDDs or external devices. They made a mistake by suggesting the Seagate eSATA and were right about suggesting the WD device. Aside from that, they've been quiet. The Seagate bombed, by the way. I just hope they leave the choices of what we use to us and don't try to shove something we don't want down our throats.

    Rich
     
  5. Oct 7, 2012 #165 of 193
    Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    28,285
    656
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    For someone with one or two HRs, a 3TB drive would seem to be sufficient. But with many more HRs, 2TBs are more than sufficient. The drawback to the 3TB drives is losing the HR that recorded its content. Then it becomes a horror story.

    I've got a huge UPL and my 24-500s handle that UPL just fine. Obviously, I don't have 10 times the capacity of my eleven 2TB drives on the UPL, that would be a bit much.

    Rich
     
  6. Oct 7, 2012 #166 of 193
    bobcamp1

    bobcamp1 Icon

    896
    1
    Nov 8, 2007
    That's because XP supports 4k logical sectors for a *secondary* USB drive. Take the drive out of the enclosure and connect it directly to SATA and see what happens. My motherboard thinks a 3TB hard drive is only 800 GB (the capacity overflowed: 3 TB - 2.2 TB = 800 GB).

    The drive inside the GoFlex enclosure has physical 512 bytes/sector, yet has 4k logical sectors in order to get around the MBR limit. That's a hardware modification -- you've added a special hard disk controller to get around the limit. How would D* put that inside millions of existing DVRs?

    There are also other third-party drivers that let XP support GPT. But that hard drive can't contain the system partition, because that driver can't load until the kernel is loaded.

    If people have tried it with an HR2x and it doesn't work, then the OS they have (or the chipset they have) doesn't support it. I don't think they're changing code just to add support to something that's not officially supported.
     
  7. Oct 7, 2012 #167 of 193
    bobcamp1

    bobcamp1 Icon

    896
    1
    Nov 8, 2007
    That happens with Tivos. When I increased the size of my Series 1's hard drive from 20 GB to 120 GB, and I had a lot of shows saved on it, it would take 8 seconds to bring up the playlist. Deleting a bunch of shows sped it right back up. Trick play was not affected. But that 54 MHz processor and 16 MB of RAM just couldn't process that gigantic database quickly. The same thing happens with the Series 4, but to a lesser extent.
     
  8. Oct 7, 2012 #168 of 193
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    23,196
    1,173
    Nov 13, 2006
    My HR24 and my HR34 do not show any signs of speed changes based on the drive being empty or completely full, I've checked, they always work at the same speeds, and that's with 2tb drives. My hr21s slow down a little, which Leeds me to believe that they are just underpowered, since they are slow anyway, even compared to an HR20.
     
  9. Oct 7, 2012 #169 of 193
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    23,196
    1,173
    Nov 13, 2006
    I'd bet for 99% of DirecTV subs though, the only reason to have a 3tb drive would be because they have a lot of people recording different things with little overlap, so a failure would only cause everyone to lose a little bit of programing, and not everyone to lose 3tb worth of recordings.
     
  10. Oct 7, 2012 #170 of 193
    P Smith

    P Smith Mr. FixAnything

    22,616
    241
    Jul 25, 2002
    W.Mdtrn Sea
    You got it backwards:
    Code:
     'hdparm -I' knows that this is a native 4k disk:
           Model Number:       ST3000DM001-9YN166
           Logical  Sector size:                   512 bytes
           Physical Sector size:                  4096 bytes
           Logical Sector-0 offset:                  0 bytes
           device size with M = 1024*1024:     2861588 MBytes
           device size with M = 1000*1000:     3000592 MBytes (3000 GB)
    Here is good reading about 4K sectors, emulation etc : http://www.seagate.com/tech-insights/advanced-format-4k-sector-hard-drives-master-ti/
     
  11. Oct 7, 2012 #171 of 193
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    23,196
    1,173
    Nov 13, 2006
    This thread is funny. We have so many ideas, and DirecTV must just laugh all day long because all of our wants in this regard are probably shared by less than10k subs, making all these ideas of how to provide redundancy not worth the time to even consider for them, especially when a workaround exists, which I think rich is taking advantage of to its fullest. :)
     
  12. Oct 9, 2012 #172 of 193
    unixguru

    unixguru Godfather

    787
    33
    Jul 9, 2007
    About the same for OTA yet they have a product for that.

    The problem is a catch-22. The "average consumer" doesn't have a clue about what might happen (many don't even backup their computers). And most won't ever see a hardware failure. But when someone gets hit, even more so now with a "Home Media Server" and likely pending storage increase, it's gonna hurt. Until they get hit they won't know to ask for solutions. And with no official product available to solve it they aren't alerted to the possibilities.

    You can bet that nobody at DTV or a retailer is going to tell a customer what will happen if a DVR fails unless they are directly asked about it. They have nothing to "up sell" and they sure don't want to advertise their weaknesses.

    Consider if just 1 company, cable, DISH, whatever, starts selling a more resilient device, even as an optional premium product. Then they will be explaining to consumers why they might want it. This will create demand for a product that doesn't currently (officially) exist. Because people like reliable products. Then all the sudden all the competitors will have to offer a more reliable product. Why be the follower? Try leading for a change.

    The workaround is a PITA for most.
     
  13. Oct 9, 2012 #173 of 193
    unixguru

    unixguru Godfather

    787
    33
    Jul 9, 2007
    So the fact that everyone in my family has to share the pain is going to make it less?

    Sure not the way my family works. I'd be the one getting the mob of "customer" complaints. They can lynch me. :lol:

    This is no different than a home computer network. Our server has RAID storage too (and backups).

    It's all a no-brainer. These are services that should be as reliable as anything else in the house. Would a similar failure rate be acceptable for a furnace, air conditioner, water heater, stove, refrigerator, freezer, microwave, ...? Those are all more reliable and to top it off one can get a service guy here with parts really quickly and when they are done it's back to full operation. May not even lose food. Lose a freezer full of food because of slow service and it's the same kind of $$ loss.

    I know it's just TV. If I lost 2 months worth of a series where the story evolves each episode then I pretty much lost the whole season. Total value is comparable to a freezer full of food. With DTV I know that a failure means that I lose it all regardless of how fast the service.
     
  14. bobcamp1

    bobcamp1 Icon

    896
    1
    Nov 8, 2007
    No, I'm (almost) right. I should have made it more clear that the controller is doing the emulation of the 4k logical sectors. The drive is definitely 512 bytes/sector. Do you have the 3 TB version of this drive?

    http://www.everythingusb.com/seagate-goflex-desk-external-hard-drive-21441.html

    Scroll down to "Breaking the 2TB Limit".

    In theory, if such a device exists for eSATA instead of USB, then you might be able to use it. 4k logical sector support has been in Linux for quite a while. But the capacity rollover I described above (with my old motherboard) could still be an issue.
     
  15. P Smith

    P Smith Mr. FixAnything

    22,616
    241
    Jul 25, 2002
    W.Mdtrn Sea
    You're still not get it right. You just ignoring data what is posted; BTW, I got the data from MY OWN DRIVE.

    Please read original SEAGATE docs, not the some user like you posts (if you will re-read his explanation again you could get grasp of 4k native size (and 512e for OS concept) properly) . And lets finish the off-topic posting.
     
  16. Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    2,117
    293
    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    Pardon my butting in on this argument, but what you are showing here is a AF drive in 512e mode. That's fine...this is required for a lots of software (like backup/restore programs) that interact with the drive at a sector level and are not 4K sector aware.

    But I am unclear about what that has to do with the original issue of MBR vs. GPT. I guess you could have a MBR drive, using 4k logical and physical sectors exceed the 2.2TB limit, but both your hardware and your OS (and any direct disk accessing software) would have to understand 4K sectors. Boot from a "traditional" disk and add a driver and you can avoid some of the hardware (BIOS) issues, and maybe you could run via 512e on the storage only drive.

    But 512e is not a good solution for a DVR since you will often have the situation of misaligned file boundaries. If one video file uses 3 emulated 512 sectors inside one 4K sector, and then the next file wants to use the other 5, you'd have to read the entire 4K sector into memory, merge the new data with the old, and then rewrite the entire sector. This is bound to happen since the DVR software, by definition in this example, thinks it is running on a 512 byte sector drive. Now imagine doing this for 5 write and 3 read processes at once and you pretty soon get someplace I don't think you want to be.

    Sure, there are plenty of ways to get 4K sector drives to work...but given the parameters of a DVR I think you either want it done via 512 byte emulation in some dedicated hardware (i.e. a USB drive, which is how Dish does it) or you want to do it through native 4K sector support in the OS (which is exactly what DirecTV has done in the HR34).
     
  17. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    28,285
    656
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    That workaround was the best I could think of. Yeah, it would be a PITA for most folks. And it was/is expensive. But it works quite well.

    Rich
     
  18. Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    2,117
    293
    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    I think you're 100% correct...there would be "official" external drive enclosures. DirecTV has shown that they like nice, predictable, installation configurations. This is not uncommon...most companies want to make things as cookie-cutter as possible - it is the easiest way to scale an operation. There is no way they would ever support "any old" ESATA drive/enclosure.
     
  19. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    28,285
    656
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    I get all the complaints from my family, too. I hate to see my wife, with fire in her eyes, heading for me with a problem. My son just depends on me to fix everything. My granddaughter comes to me and looks at me with those beautiful puppy dog eyes and asks me to fix what ever isn't working for her.

    There you'll get the good old "it's only TV" answer.

    At least if you lose a freezer full of food for most reasons, your homeowner's insurance will cover it. Who covers what a person with 4TBs of content loses if his 34 fails?

    I agree with everything you've said. But, we're gonna be told we're in the minority and we don't matter. Been thru this many times and the answer's always the same. We are anomalies. Nobody but a few of us take advantage of the eSATA function. Not enough people care. If all those answers are valid, why did D* allow larger external HDDs for the 34s?

    Rich
     
  20. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    28,285
    656
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    We've gone this long without their overt support, I'd like to see it stay that way. They have improved the eSATA function over the years and for that I salute them.

    Rich
     

Share This Page