1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A 2nd DTV Delay? Ridiculous!

Discussion in 'Local Reception' started by n3ntj, Feb 21, 2009.

  1. n3ntj

    n3ntj Hall Of Fame

    Dec 18, 2006
    Today, on TV I heard a discussion that the analog shutoff may have to be delayed until December 2009 because 'some people' still won't be ready in June. I find this totally ridiculous! What the heck have these people doing all this time? We all knew this was coming in Feb. If some people refused to act appropriately, heck with them!
  2. tcusta00

    tcusta00 Active Member

    Dec 31, 2007
    Oh my, please say it ain't so. I hope it wasn't anyone with any pull. :eek2:
  3. Gonesouth

    Gonesouth Legend

    Dec 26, 2007
    This is what is going to happen for the near future! I would say more but do not want to make this a political discussion!

    I am glad I do not have to worry about this.

  4. fluffybear

    fluffybear Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    Jun 19, 2004

    There is always going to be someone who is not ready and talk about pushing back the date again. However, I do not believe a second delay would ever fly in congress asthe number not prepared decreases daily and far to many supporters (of the first delay) in congress made it quite clear that they would never support a second delay.
  5. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    Never say never, but at this point, let's say that another third of the total number of stations signs off in June even if there is a delay... what would be the point?
  6. boylehome

    boylehome Hall Of Fame/Supporter

    Jul 16, 2004
    I wouldn't be surprised if there are more delays. In fact they may just decide to scrap digital and return to analog:grin:
  7. Grentz

    Grentz New Member

    Jan 10, 2007
    Just stupid. "Everyone" is never going to be ready and that is a fact. Cut off their TV and then the rest will finally switch over.

    I am starting to find it sickening that TV is that important, and if it is that important you should figure out how it works a tiny bit and take the warnings that have been going on for months, and even years in some cases, seriously.
  8. Mark Holtz

    Mark Holtz Day Sleeper DBSTalk Club

    Mar 23, 2002
    Sacramento, CA
    I did a quick scan of Google News, and the only mention of a delay to December, 2009 would be in Australia.
  9. robmadden1

    robmadden1 Legend

    Nov 2, 2008
    Whats your source? What station did you hear this on?
  10. samhevener

    samhevener Godfather

    Feb 23, 2006
    There won't be a second delay. Congress will never aprove it, in fact Congress will not even take the time to talk about a second delay. Where did this so called discussion get it's facts? Maybe another "talk show host" faking a point of view in order to improve his or her ratings. No "talk show host" ever received high ratings or stayed on the air by siding with the majority of the people. You are right, the point is totally ridiculous.
  11. Yes616

    Yes616 Legend

    Sep 5, 2006
    Someone quoting Swanni Says maybe? :lol:
  12. Glen_D

    Glen_D Legend

    Oct 21, 2006
    Didn't the Government sell off at least some of the analog spectrum? The buyers aren't going to wait around forever to make use of their purchase.
  13. jimmyv2000

    jimmyv2000 Hall Of Fame

    Feb 15, 2007
    Manchester NH
    The Braodcasters had been drilling 2/17/09 into our heads for almost 2 years now.
    Now the day is 6/12/09,Enough already.The FIRM DATE should be 6/12,no stories no exceptions!:D
    If people aren't ready by then OH well too bad so sad.You had plenty of notice. Go get or hook up your box and be done with it.

    Not to be too political here But congress should file a bill to add a line on the 2009 tax form for a converter box deduction of $40.00 per box up to 2.
    Less money spent on coupons. Just my 2 cents
  14. SamC

    SamC Hall Of Fame

    Jan 20, 2003
    See I told you so.

    The small market stations with the courage to hold to the original date have proven that the whole issue has absolutely nothing to do with the less than one percent of Americans who lack the intelect to ever be "ready" despite years of being given simple instuctions.

    The "giveback" of these millions of dollars of frequencies in major cities will NEVER occur.


    Now those who, for years, said the February date was "firm" and were wrong, and then said that the O&Os and their minions would "never ask again" and that the June date was "firm" will post that I, and everyone else who understands this issue, are off the mark, again.

    And in July, and in December, and in July 2020, analog TV will still be up and running.
  15. dodge boy

    dodge boy R.I.P. Chris Henry

    Mar 31, 2006
    Swanni is only good at predicting the past.....
  16. ercjncprdtv

    ercjncprdtv Legend

    Feb 11, 2008
    I can end this discussion right now...the bill revising the date to June 12th prohibits further delay.
  17. samhevener

    samhevener Godfather

    Feb 23, 2006
    The original cutoff date of Feb 17th will happen on June 12, 2009. There will be no second delay for high power stations. Several LP stations will be on the air after that date per the original bill.
  18. SamC

    SamC Hall Of Fame

    Jan 20, 2003
    Umm, the original bill prohibited delay as well. And in May, when the next delay is pushed through, it will be the last time as well. And then the next one will be the last one.

    Eventually the tactic will change. We will be told that the "poor" will never understand and that the whole thing was a bad idea. So "parallel" broadcasting will continue into some unknown date to the future. Then, we will be told that it is a waste to show the same thing on the digital channel as the analog channel and the stations will ask for permission to "save" bandwidth by "competing with cable" and using the digital sidechannels for scrambled programming.

    Which was the plan all along.
  19. Lee L

    Lee L Hall Of Fame

    Aug 15, 2002
    I would have been much mor eafraid of something like that happening SamC if not for the fact that 1/3 of stations went ahead and converted on 2-17. It sure seemed like some in the new administration were awfully surprised by that. If I were a huge conspiracy nut, I would say thet they really were planning on spiking the whole transition and they were twarted by teh fact that so many stations wanted to move now.

    Whatever the reasons, the transition pretty much has to go on now since so many stations are in limbo.
  20. n3ntj

    n3ntj Hall Of Fame

    Dec 18, 2006
    I don't recall what channel I heard the discussion on, but it was one of the news channels (CNN or MSNBC possibly?) on Saturday. The discussion lasted about 2~3 minutes, and then they went to another topic. I heard it in the background (I was in a different room) and I couldn't believe what I was hearing. When I heard it, I believe I yelled "BS" but in the long regular form.

    I also thought the initial law stated the date was 17 Feb 2009 and no delay was possible, but you can change anything with enough legislative votes, as we've seen with the delay to June. Making the delay once set a dangerous precedence..just like giving money out to banks, car companies, etc. I think the only way some people will 'get ready' is if their TV signal is turned off first, and then the people HAVE to act. Trying to get people to act first before something happens, is useless and you'll always have bozos complaining and whining that they are ready or they're being discriminated against.

Share This Page