Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'TV Show Talk' started by phrelin, Nov 18, 2011.
All in the Family is still on the air today, in reruns. Have not heard any complaints about it.
That's because it's not on nationwide in prime time or even nationwide on a cable channel where the whole country can see it. Consequently, your statement doesn't mean a thing, unfortunately.
Well, if you watch Comedy Central, you will still see sarcastic humor involving minorities. Not network tv though, so probably still doesnt mean anything.
You will also see profanity on Comedy Central. That isn't allowed on network TV. When I refer to shows like All in the Family, I refer to them not being permitted on network TV. The same rules don't apply to cable/satellite, for obvious reasons.
Dont know what Comedy Central you are watching, but the one I watch still BEEPS out just about every profanity there is. Most notably, on the two shows I watch Daily Show, and Cobert Report.
Some shows, probably the later night ones, do have profanity, at least profanity that isn't allowed on the networks. It's the same thing for most cable/satellite channels.
Network TV = nothing racially insensitive, profane, derogatory, etc.
Cable/satellite = some nudity, profanity, etc. OK
And keep in mind that ABC, the subject of this thread, is owned by the folks at Disney. I figured someone at ABC thought "Work It" would be a cool, edgy show and slipped it in the schedule because the suits at Disney didn't pay any attention and thought anything with "work" in the title would be good for business.
I'm also sure that if the title of the show had been "2 Crossing-Dressing Men, 1 Puerto Rican", the show wouldn't have gotten to pilot purchase in the Disney organization.
Ummm, you're the one who brought up those examples. My example was cross-dressing men. That's CLEARLY more widely accepted now than it was when Bosom Buddies was on the air in the 80's.
Why do you always have to chime in with "1 Puerto Rican"? The show made no reference to his race, only you do. His race was never brought up, not an issue and not a selling point of the show. Only you are singling in on his race.
No it's not, unless it's intentionally done as a comedic farce, like in that TV show or in several movies, like Gene Hackman's scene at the end of The Birdcage.
If a show today was on network TV featuring a true transvestite, it wouldn't get as warm a reception, although I submit that it might not face the vitriol that an All in the Family show would face, primarily because it's not politically correct to protest transvestites/gays/etc.
Pick your story.
Or my favorite headline in the Latin American Herald Tribune: ABC Pressed to Apologize for Joke About Puerto Rican Drug Dealers
Yeah, it's only me and my closest friends in the press.
See, what did I tell you? Different groups and different people all bitching about the show, demanding apologies, organizing opposition, etc.
Hypersensitivity and political correctness run amuck.
Yeah, if you want to see just how far Archie Bunker would make it today, read this account of the assault on "2 Broke Girls" at the Television Critics Association get together with the networks this week. What had me rolling with laughter was this exchange:
Being of Irish heritage myself, I found it hilarious but I'm sure some of my uptight relatives would not - older ones because they are "ethnically sensitive" (meaning they're Archie Bunkers) and younger ones because everything just must be politically correct.
Keep in mind that every broadcast network made a presentation to these clowns at the Television Critics Association and instead of dealing with the multitude of economic problems facing broadcast TV, this is what they devoted time to - political correctness.
Apparently the critics don't watch FX, AMC, HBO, Showtime, etc. Oh wait, those are the channels that have all the shows they shower with praise using words like "smart" and "edgy."
At least Archie Bunker was portrayed simply as a bigot which is different from a hypocrite like the critics, by which in this context I mean "a person who pretends to have principles but whose actions belie stated beliefs."
Sorry, I get irked whenever I think about the "politically correct" movement.
Too many people in this country are just so damn uptight. Everyone's a victim. People should just loosen up and laugh a little--or a lot--including at themselves. Hell, I do it all the time.
I disagree 110%. We live in a day and age where transvestites and transgender people openly walk down the street and nothing happens to them. We also live in a day and age where same-sex marriages take place and there are gays in the military. Our society is FAR more accepting now of a show like "Work It!" than it was "Bosom Buddies" in the 80's and you can't convince me otherwise.
I don't get where one actor being Puerto Rican has anything to do with anything. We weren't even told he was actually Puerto Rican. The words "Puerto Rican" didn't even come up! For all we know he's Mexican or Cuban or Dominican. And there certainly were NO jokes directed at Puerto Ricans or anything that was funny just because he was Hispanic at all. And really, WHO CARES what race he may or may not be?
No, not political correctness. Use the real word, discrimination.
Maybe that's one reason all the good Mel Brooks movies are older ones. I actually did come across someone that thought he was an anti-Semite because of the jokes in his movies. That really surprised me.
In that context, for this show to have been as risky as Bosom Buddies was in the early 80s, shouldn't it have featured actual trans-gendered or cross-dressing characters, rather than just explicitly straight guys dressing up?
If you read my links you would know why there was a big kerfluffle. From The Latin American Herald:
Thus we end up with reports about Nolasco having to Tweet about it:
It is irrelevant to me that he's Puerto Rican. That his line referred to "Puerto Rican" was irrelevant to me. But it apparently wasn't irrelevant to others and, though they didn't need it, the others gave ABC/Disney more "you see" reasons to cancel the show.
Cross-dressing sexuality implications was also irrelevant to me. But apparently not to others.