1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Be HONEST NOW! How many pd for (or will pay for) MRV who SWORE they wouldn't?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Connected Home' started by TBlazer07, May 16, 2010.

  1. May 16, 2010 #21 of 149


    Dec 11, 2006
    Long Island, NY
    I voted nothing but will drop a premium channel or a receiver which I did $3.00 is worth it
  2. May 16, 2010 #22 of 149

    joed32 Hall Of Fame

    Jul 27, 2006
    A lot of people who said they wouldn't were trying to convince Directv not to charge for it. I like it a lot and will keep it.
  3. May 16, 2010 #23 of 149

    xmetalx Godfather

    Jun 3, 2009
    $3 is pretty reasonable considering that it DOES cost them something to maintain it. Think about all the technical and networking employees that are supporting it and the 18 million subs, not to mention the R&D of the DECA technology (yes, I know its based on MoCa 1.1).
  4. May 16, 2010 #24 of 149

    CuriousG Mentor

    Nov 23, 2006
    I didn't participate in the bitching threads (as you can see by post count), but I don't think a no-cost feature for DirecTV should be a $3.00 per month charge for me. I'm paying for the hardware and the feature itself is not a premium service in that it doesn't cost DirecTV anything each month for me the have MRV.

    With that said, I was the first in my area, according to the installers yesterday, to have DECA installed. I was using the beta feature for several weeks, and I think this is one of the most useful features DirecTV has come up with. My way of self justification was that I was considering an external HDD for one of the DVRs but now that both of my DVRs act as one, I "saved" the cost of the HDD. That should cover the price of MRV for a couple of years ;).
  5. May 16, 2010 #25 of 149
    Lee L

    Lee L Hall Of Fame

    Aug 15, 2002
    I always said it was a bad idea and IMO a better business case can be built for using it as a feature to lure people into staying with DirecTV and adding more recievers, but I never said I would not pay it, because I knew I had to have it, unless it was say $20 or something.
  6. May 16, 2010 #26 of 149

    SPACEMAKER Freethinker

    Dec 11, 2007
    Mason, MI
    I said from day one that I would pay up to $5 for MRV so getting it for $3 is pretty sweet. Now I just have to get it installed.
  7. May 16, 2010 #27 of 149

    NR4P Dad

    Jan 15, 2007
    Sunny Florida
    I haven't decided yet. I'm going to let the MRV Beta expire in a few days and then go through withdrawl. Lived without it for years, now have it, got to like it so will let you know next week on how severe the withdrawl pains are.
  8. May 16, 2010 #28 of 149

    TBlazer07 Grumpy Grampy

    Feb 5, 2009
    I was one of the (few) folks who said I'd pay up to $10 for it (or whatever the highest number in the poll was) but I had absolutely no doubt it would NOT be anywhere near that. Realistically I though it would be $4-$5. To me it has made a world of difference in the TV experience and at $3 was reasonable and worth the expense. Would I have liked it for free? Whadyathink? I ain't stoopit!
  9. May 16, 2010 #29 of 149

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    Dec 9, 2006
    Would the Jury please return and announce the verdict. :lol:
  10. May 16, 2010 #30 of 149

    TBlazer07 Grumpy Grampy

    Feb 5, 2009
    Dats because I live in New Joisey so I gotta be stoopit.
  11. May 16, 2010 #31 of 149

    Steve Well-Known Member

    Aug 22, 2006
    I was originally in the "if it's my network, I shouldn't pay" camp, because I felt MRV should be included in the base software. $3/month is so reasonable tho, I'd be biting my nose to spite my face by not paying for such a game-changing (IMHO) feature.

    I say game-changing because I no longer have to worry about scheduling conflicts and show start/stop times. With so many tuners at my disposal, I can divvy up network shows in a way that practically guarantees every recording will be padded on each side and there will be no Series Manager conflicts.

    And I forgot to mention.... I can now watch any recording in any room! :)
  12. May 17, 2010 #32 of 149
    Mike Bertelson

    Mike Bertelson 6EQUJ5 WOW! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    Jan 24, 2007
    I did. It seems I spoke too soon when I said I wouldn't pay for it, and it also seems that is wasn't my decision in the first place.

    Without it my wife can't watch General Hospital in the living room and also be able to watch it while on her treadmill in the spare room. :grin:

    TBlazer07, maybe this should be a poll. :)

  13. May 17, 2010 #33 of 149

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    Jul 28, 2004
    If the early orders are any indication...the demand exceeds the original stated interest.

    Clearly MRV has strong appeal and strong adoption.

    Not everyone will see a value in MRV, but there will likely be a widespread success in the market for this $3 new service.
  14. May 17, 2010 #34 of 149
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Ah, so the non-techies are to blame .. Here is what I said early last November (links to CE forum) .. ;)

  15. May 17, 2010 #35 of 149

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    Jul 28, 2004
    Translation = I told you so. :lol:
  16. May 17, 2010 #36 of 149

    PCampbell Icon

    Nov 18, 2006
    I said I did not like paying for MRV that I set up.
  17. May 17, 2010 #37 of 149
    Mike Bertelson

    Mike Bertelson 6EQUJ5 WOW! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    Jan 24, 2007
    Yeah, I got that. :rolleyes:

    I never thought it would be that important, but both my wife and daughter use it daily.

    I thought that fact that both my main DVRs are in the living room that I didn't really need it.

    The girls told me we're keeping it. I usually have to acquiesce when they get together on something…life’s easier that way. :grin:

  18. May 17, 2010 #38 of 149

    ffemtreed Icon

    Jan 30, 2008
    I might pay for it during the winter season, but there is no way i am signing up for it anytime soon.

    If they included other things like combining all available tuners to get around scheduling conflicts or came up with a computer application to be able to manage recording I would probably go for it. I am thinking DTV's vaporware of a home media server will be available before I decide to pay for MRV

    I just build an old computer out of parts laying around the house to put a computer in the bedroom. I'll stick with DTV2PC for now.
  19. May 17, 2010 #39 of 149

    Beerstalker Hall Of Fame

    Feb 9, 2009
    Peoria, IL
    I am still planning on losing MRV when the beta expires. I actually just talked it over with my fiance over the weekend and when I told her it was going to cost $3/month to keep it she said that was bullpoop. I still feel that we are being ripped off. What is the $7/month DVR fee going toward if it isn't to make improvements on the functions of their DVRs? Why didn't that cover the cost of developing MRV/DECA? Why do they feel this requires another charge?

    The answer is they feel that people will pay for it. From the looks of this thread it appears they are right. I still personally feel this is bogus and don't plan on supporting this decision by keeping MRV. However if my fiance decides that she really wants it back then I will probably relent and sign up for it (most likely won't do the DECA install though so hopefully that gets straightened out).

    I already went around last summer and organized our shows so they are recorded in the most watched locations anyway (her shows in the living room, my shows in the theater room, shows we watch together in the bedroom). So I really don't think it will effect us all that much.
  20. May 17, 2010 #40 of 149

    jerrylove56 Godfather

    Jun 14, 2008
    North Alabama
    Said 0. Has not been working properly anyway and so I will not miss it.

Share This Page