1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Comcast Philadelphia

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by valleygreen22, Mar 7, 2010.

  1. Jake34

    Jake34 AllStar

    58
    0
    Feb 24, 2007
    I agree with hog ota nut......I tried to post something a month or so and got message that it had been shut down and it would not let me post. I was surprised when I started getting posts again.
    For me, I have never lost interest in what is going on with this. People who write to Directv and/or the FCC have been very helpful in letting us know of their responses and keeps us on top of this subject.
    We cannot just give up on this and it is important to continue the pressure on Directv. If we give any indication that we no longer care, it just helps take the pressure of them.
     
  2. fireponcoal

    fireponcoal Icon

    761
    14
    Sep 26, 2009
    Hah. Installers do have the most accurate scoops. ;)
     
  3. n3ntj

    n3ntj Hall Of Fame

    5,773
    13
    Dec 18, 2006
    Lancaster,...
    I'm surprised we haven't had a post recently saying... 'a D* installer told me today that D* will have CSN Philly by the beginning of the NHL season in October'... ;)
     
  4. wilbur_the_goose

    wilbur_the_goose Hall Of Fame

    4,519
    62
    Aug 16, 2006
    Those installer-in-the-know posts usually came from our friend la24philly. (I know he meant well!)
     
  5. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    These days the installers are predicting when the NHL season will start.
     
  6. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,386
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Easiest is for you to unsubscribe to this thread.
     
  7. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,386
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    I haven't read all 2000+ posts, but isn't it CSN Philly that's the miscreant?? Aren't they being obstinate in order to keep DIRECTV® out? Trying to protect a closed circuit so to speak....?
     
  8. wilbur_the_goose

    wilbur_the_goose Hall Of Fame

    4,519
    62
    Aug 16, 2006
    Laxguy - nobody but C* and D* know.

    Nobody's talking, and I"m assuming C* and D* aren't exactly friendly.
     
  9. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,386
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Well, I not expecting the CEO or Doug or Earl or SatRacer to drop by and say anything!
    But we don't seem to lack folks with opinions, some of them even right on!

    :eek2:
     
  10. AMike

    AMike Godfather

    385
    11
    Nov 21, 2005
    Perhaps this question has been asked before, but since DirecTV owns Root Sports, why don't they use those channels as leverage and provide a favorable rate if they were to add CSN-Philly? The three RS channels are in Comcast cable markets and 2 of the 3 have long term contracts with their local teams.
     
  11. n3ntj

    n3ntj Hall Of Fame

    5,773
    13
    Dec 18, 2006
    Lancaster,...
    It was reported last summer, IIRC, that the Root Sports RSNs were due for their carriage renewal in at least some of their markets with Comcrap, such as in the Pittsburgh area. If Comcrap couldn't provide Roots Pittsburgh, that would have really PO'd off Pens and Pirates fans and drawn more business away from Comcrap in that DMA. It would have been a great opportunity for D* (which owns the Roots RSNs) to gain some much needed leverage in obtaining a carriage agreement for CSN Philly in the process. Of course, we don't know the particulars of the new agreement, but I believe that D* probably dropped the ball in using that renewal to get CSN Philly.
     
  12. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Not sure that would be totally legal. It is not legal to bundle unrelated channels on one end. Not sure it would not be frowned upon to trade channels. Plus if other carriers had most favored nation clauses, that could mess up a lot of things.
     
  13. WebTraveler

    WebTraveler Icon

    1,092
    5
    Apr 9, 2006
    I don't know if it is legal or not, but who really cares? The FCC doesn't enforce crap and has let this issue waver.

    Can easily say we'll charge the same price for Root that you do for CSN Philly...and if you restrict we'll restrict. There are ways to up the ante.

    But the fact of the matter is that Directv has run the numbers and determined that they don't want to pay out the $$$$ needed to secure CSN Philadelphia. If they add the channel then they need to pay x amount each month for every viewer.....and they are not prepared for that.
     
  14. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    I see where you are coming from. Laws are only good when they are convenient. And damned other consequences.

    Hmm. Maybe directv has run the numbers on the PAC 12, too?
     
  15. hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Interesting reading in this thread.

    As someone who goes to Philly about 15 times a year (for more than 12 years now), I get plenty of opportunity to view the Comcast sports channels. I also frequent WIP radio to get some of the same "cast of characters" that appear on Comcast sports.

    I'd rate their content overall as a B-, in terms of anything I would want to view over time. There is plenty of programming that consists of strongly-opinionated and virtually arrogant "sports expert commentary". There's no shortage of that. Likewise, I've seen some impressive "behind the scenes" interviews and "documentary-type" programming that is quite outstanding.

    Philly is a "tough" sports town in more ways than one - and the Comcast programming seems to align with that audience. I'm not sure the same popularity holds true outside of that market.

    My biggest "issue" with Comcast is their corporate demeanor...which is not exactly friendly. That has certainly contributed to no less than 1/2 of the contractual debates with other providers to date.
     
  16. fireponcoal

    fireponcoal Icon

    761
    14
    Sep 26, 2009
    Their produced content is awful as is most of the chatter coming from WIP. The only reason that many(not all of course) people want CSN is for the sports that are broadcast on the network. There are plenty of inane talking heads on every RSN in the Direct TV sports pack, ESPN or even the Comcast owned NBC sports offering so any D* subscriber already has that in abundance.

    Comcast is arrogant but as a company that just purchased NBC they must be doing something right. An arrogant capitalist endeavor, imagine such a thing? ;)
     
  17. jeepwrang3

    jeepwrang3 Legend

    137
    0
    Aug 19, 2006
    http://www.latimes.com/entertainmen...et-ct-program-access-20120914,0,3901099.story

    Basically the requirements that Cable share with Satellite is scheduled to expire 10/5/12 and the FCC feels that everything is good between distributors.

    I'm really hoping that the FCC is letting this go because there is a deal in the works which makes the old 1992 Cable Act clause useless. Then I realize this is the FCC and we're all gonna get left in the dark.
     
  18. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,386
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Nice link, good catch.

    One oddity in the reporting:
    I wonder how do those rules prevent widening distribution? I think that's a strawman.
     
  19. JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    4,676
    39
    Jul 21, 2008
    well I think the RSN that the teams have a big part of the owner ship are safe.

    CSN Chicago has BIG sponsorship from NON comcast tv providers and the teams have 80% owner ship
     
  20. TheRatPatrol

    TheRatPatrol Hall Of Fame

    7,319
    234
    Oct 1, 2003
    Phoenix, AZ
    I started a thread about this here
     

Share This Page