1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Comcast SportsNet Houston

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by TravelFan1, Oct 2, 2012.

  1. Oct 15, 2012 #21 of 471
    Snickering Hound

    Snickering Hound Mentor

    59
    0
    Nov 3, 2011
    Astros own 46%, Rockets 31% and Comcast 23%.

    Astros and Rockets need that TV revenue since they have lousy teams and have a hard time filling seats.
     
  2. Oct 16, 2012 #22 of 471
    SamC

    SamC Hall Of Fame

    2,154
    56
    Jan 20, 2003
    The Astros and Rangers share a claim to all of Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas and a small part of New Mexico. The goal of CSN-H is to be on every system in the state and region, not just Comcast systems around Houston. It will have to offer the channel to DirecTV at the same price it offers it to the myriad of other cable companies across the region.

    The delay, if you follow DirecTV's history, is that it is not going to pick up something just for the NBA. It will wait until baseball returns next April and pick up the channel, as it has in the past.
     
  3. Oct 16, 2012 #23 of 471
    say-what

    say-what Active Member

    5,795
    15
    Dec 14, 2006
    New Orleans
    678 and 678-1 have already been rebranded as FOX Sports New Orleans in the guide.
     
  4. Oct 16, 2012 #24 of 471
    triplela

    triplela New Member

    5
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    Are you getting the FS Oklahoma channel full time or just for games, similart to how FS Houston was? I noticed last night, as Say What posted above, that 678 and 678-1 are now labeled Fox Sports New Orleans and was wondering what we could expect as far as how often this channel will be live. I'm assuming it will be "game only" like FS Houston was, but I guess we won't know for sure until 10/31 when the channel launches.
     
  5. Oct 16, 2012 #25 of 471
    FenixTX

    FenixTX Godfather

    480
    6
    Nov 11, 2005
    It will be game only as FS Houston was.
     
  6. Oct 16, 2012 #26 of 471
    twiseguy

    twiseguy Legend

    211
    16
    Jan 31, 2011
    Stow, Ohio
    My heart goes out to Mr. White and anyone else with any G.A.D.

    I was just wondering how on Earth Houston can justify a high pick on a person that will contribute so little, in NOT injured, because of his disorder. I know this may take several years to remedy (why didn`t Iowa State help Mr. White during his stay). That 2-3 years is probably a large percent of his NBA career not he is not capable of the travel.

    It`s Houston`s thinking, not Mr. White.
     
  7. Oct 16, 2012 #27 of 471
    fleckrj

    fleckrj Icon

    1,569
    146
    Sep 4, 2009
    Cary, NC
    This is getting way off topic, but I believe Iowa State DID help Mr. White during his stay. Also, he did manage to make it to all the Iowa State games. While he prefers not to fly if there is an alternative, as far as I know, the only time he did not fly when he was scheduled to was when he cancelled his recruiting trip to Kentucky when he was in the process of transferring from Minnesota. As a result, he ended up at Iowa State instead of Kentucky. In the long run, that was probably better for his career, because as good as he is, he would not have played as many minutes at Kentucky as he did at Iowa State. It is a gamble for Houston, but even if he only plays at home, Dallas, Oklahoma City, and New Orleans (and I do not think that will happen), he will be an asset to the team.
     
  8. Oct 16, 2012 #28 of 471
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Regardless, the addition and/or removal of a player from a team, does not increase or decrease the value of the TV deal. You can't gamble your numbers on whether a player will play or not, and you can't use it as a reason for carriage. Players get injured, players get suspended, players get traded within their contract time if they underperform, etc, etc....

    A TV deal is usually struck for 3-5 years, and more often than not (these deals last 10 years or more. The whole team will have changed by then.
     
  9. Oct 16, 2012 #29 of 471
    TXD16

    TXD16 Icon

    958
    30
    Oct 29, 2008
    679 and 679-1 are both part-time, with 679 carrying games plus limited, mostly OU programing, and -1 being games-only.

    I noticed the 678 and 678-1 (re)additions, too. Maybe the wait for CSN Houston won't be so bad after all. ;)
     
  10. Oct 17, 2012 #30 of 471
    triplela

    triplela New Member

    5
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    I read on another forum, Clutch Fans, I think, that in similar situations, Directv didn't add the channel for just one team and waited till the second team in the city was starting or close to starting. If that is the case, then CSN Houston may not be added till next spring when the Astros start up. For Rockets' fans, I hope I'm wrong. As a resident in the New Orleans area, we went 10 years without being able to watch Hornets games on Directv thanks to their deal with Cox. Thankfully, the Hornets are now signed with Fox and we have Fox Sports New Orleans and I can finally watch Hornets games on my TV. For myself, I just hope it gets settled for baseball season so I can watch the Astros.
     
  11. Oct 24, 2012 #31 of 471
    bulldogtx

    bulldogtx Cool Member

    18
    0
    May 27, 2008
    The math isn't great when you consider Comcast reportedly has 800,000 subscribers in the Houston area and DirecTV has just shy of 20 million nationwide. On the other hand, you would think that since the teams are the majority owner that there would be incentive to have the largest possible TV audience (however, these are usually long term deals and the TV network is likely motivated to hold out as long as possible if they think they can get more money rather than caving quickly and settling for less on a long term deal). I'm just hopeful that once the regular NBA season has started that there will be enough motivation to get deals done.
     
  12. Oct 28, 2012 #32 of 471
    TXD16

    TXD16 Icon

    958
    30
    Oct 29, 2008
    With the start of the NBA season imminent (by the way, in case you haven't heard, the Rockets just picked up James Harden), I placed a call to DIRECTV to see what progress had been made with regard to the addition of CSN Houston. Not too surprisingly, the first CSR with whom I spoke hadn't a clue as to what I was referring, so I asked to be transferred, which, of course, resulted in an immediate disconnect (big surprise).

    Anyway, I redialed, and got to a retention CSR, who, as usual, listened intently, researched, and informed me that, in essence, it ain't lookin' good for DIRECTV Rockets fans this season. In other words, "Too bad, so sad."

    Of course, on any contact with DIRECTV I always inquire as to available credits and promotions, so I did come out of the call with a bunch of additional credits and free channels (I'm actually impressed that they found something else to offer as I already have my second round of 24-month HD credit, another 24-month $20.00 "courtesy" credit, and a 12-month MRV credit), but what I really want is CSN Houston!

    In any event, given the additional amount of credits and free programming provided, I am of the opinion that A) a near-term addition of CSN Houston to the DIRECTV lineup is not likely, and B) DIRECTV continues to do just enough to keep me, and others of my ilk, happy, but not ecstatic. ;)
     
  13. Oct 31, 2012 #33 of 471
    Visman

    Visman Legend

    207
    4
    Feb 16, 2008
    Houston, TX
    I noticed in the guide that there are 2 feeds of the Rockets and Pistons game tonight, I suppose that one feed is The Rockets feed and the other is the Pistons feed. My question is will I be able to watch the Rockets feed, they are playing on Comcast Sportsnet Houston or will I be blackout on both feeds? I do subscribe to NBA League Pass and live in the Houston area.
     
  14. Oct 31, 2012 #34 of 471
    WebTraveler

    WebTraveler Icon

    1,092
    5
    Apr 9, 2006
    We've dealt with this in Portland for years....Comcast and the Blazers.....5 years later we're still waiting....so don't hold your breath, it's not happening.


     
  15. Oct 31, 2012 #35 of 471
    HoTat2

    HoTat2 Hall Of Fame

    7,416
    197
    Nov 16, 2005
    Los...
    Short of a carriage agreement with CSN SN Houston, you will be blacked out on both feeds even if you subscribe to LP, sorry.

    But feel your pain though, Lakers visit Portland tonight on TWC SN and we're blacked out on all DIRECTV feeds here as well. :(
     
  16. Oct 31, 2012 #36 of 471
    Visman

    Visman Legend

    207
    4
    Feb 16, 2008
    Houston, TX
    Wlll if that is the case I will cancel NBA League Pass :confused::nono:
     
  17. Oct 31, 2012 #37 of 471
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    23,205
    1,173
    Nov 13, 2006
    It's only blacked out for Los Angeles people. If you don't live in Los Angeles, you will get it on league pass.
     
  18. Oct 31, 2012 #38 of 471
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    He was reacting to Rockets blackout and Lakers game is on nba channel tonight.
     
  19. Oct 31, 2012 #39 of 471
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    23,205
    1,173
    Nov 13, 2006
    Ah. Well same applys for him and the rockets as it does me and Lakers. Sucks! :)
     
  20. Oct 31, 2012 #40 of 471
    TXD16

    TXD16 Icon

    958
    30
    Oct 29, 2008

Share This Page