My very favorite of the backlash posts. So far. Realize, what I was pointing out was the reference to "sharper", which is what I posted a particular example of and how that can't actually be the case. While I did not refer to general PQ, which indeed has other factors behind it, I am skeptical of many of those factors as well, and for very similar reasons. What is truly unfortunate is that if you catch just one misperception and give smoking-gun evidence of why it is a misperception in a report that is supposed to be water-tight, that this can undermine the credibility of the entire report. That's not fair, but that's what happens. While I am well aware that sharpness is only one large part of PQ (and the chief improvement, possibly the only real improvement that HD brings over SD), I guess it still never hurts to point that out. So thanks.