1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DIRECTV and HDNet Settle Lawsuit

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by tfederov, Dec 7, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dec 7, 2007 #101 of 124
    Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
    So you would rather pay the extra $10 a month for the next year?
    Instead of the lower rates?
     
  2. Dec 7, 2007 #102 of 124
    Dave

    Dave Icon

    864
    0
    Jan 28, 2003
    Actually it would only be a $ 5 increase. In (8) days the cost goes up $5. And I would be willing to bet that the cost will go up in Feb or March as a 4% rate increase for the packages. So we are talking about in actuality a $10 to $ 15 cost raise within the next (4) FOUR months. As some have said, $ 5 for 4 to 6 channels is kind of obsessive on D's part. Some will not get the extra package, I being one of them. This is why I think it would be more reasonable on D's part to do the increase now and include all HD channels in the rate hike. As I also stated before DirectV is going to loose on this deal. People will not pick up 4 channels for $ 5.
     
  3. Dec 7, 2007 #103 of 124
    spartanstew

    spartanstew Dry as a bone

    12,566
    61
    Nov 16, 2005
    Wylie, Texas
    I'm just glad my ma and pa aren't as ignorant as some other peoples.
     
  4. Dec 7, 2007 #104 of 124
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    I think he meant Ma and Pa Kent. From the 1950s comic books.

    Otherwise known as the "What about the stupid people? What will we do about the stupid people?" defense.
     
  5. Dec 7, 2007 #105 of 124
    DCSholtis

    DCSholtis Up The Irons!

    5,775
    6
    Aug 7, 2002
    Your not the only odd duck here. I'm also still subbing to the Extra HD pack for the reasons you stated.
     
  6. Dec 7, 2007 #106 of 124
    paulh

    paulh Godfather

    447
    0
    Mar 17, 2003
    What about the marketing aspect in regards to HDNET and Discovery HD Theater in the base package?

    If D* put those channels in the extra tier, then many small cable companies that have HDNET had Discovery HD Theater as 2 of their 5 HD channels could advertise that DirecTV charges a whopping $15/mo for those channels you've grown to love....
     
  7. Dec 7, 2007 #107 of 124
    Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
    My guess that aspect of it has next to nill to do with the choice to put them in the base package.
     
  8. Dec 7, 2007 #108 of 124
    paulh

    paulh Godfather

    447
    0
    Mar 17, 2003
    History is often seen as the reason that a channel stays in a base package. It is not too often a channel gets bumped out of the base package.
     
  9. Dec 7, 2007 #109 of 124
    newsposter

    newsposter Hall Of Fame

    1,429
    1
    Nov 12, 2003
    i hear this ad on philly radio all the time...i hate that they say programs...but it's true advertising...not 200 channels. If someone doesnt hear the difference then it bites.

    if that is 'more hd' so be it.
     
  10. Dec 7, 2007 #110 of 124
    Newshawk

    Newshawk Hall Of Fame

    2,441
    0
    Sep 3, 2004
    Broken...
    It's that button marked "RES", right next to the four blue lights. Press it until the light by 720p or 1080i lights up. There you are.
     
  11. Dec 8, 2007 #111 of 124
    rahlquist

    rahlquist Hall Of Fame

    1,671
    3
    Jul 24, 2007
    Well here in Atlanta CC has been plugging HD saying they have 212 HD programs running at any given time.
     
  12. Dec 9, 2007 #112 of 124
    narcolept

    narcolept Godfather

    355
    0
    Mar 1, 2007
    I've only perused the last 3 pages of this thread so far, but what I find very amusing is that no one realizes the "HD Extra Pack" is the same thing that people are ASKING FOR in the ala carte threads. It allows you the option to get the additional channels if you want them, and to not have them if you don't.

    Sounds perfectly reasonable to me, so we'll send you back to your regularly scheduled name calling, bickering, and questioning Earl's motives for trying to provide information.
     
  13. Dec 9, 2007 #113 of 124
    rahlquist

    rahlquist Hall Of Fame

    1,671
    3
    Jul 24, 2007
    Hmm not exactly what I think of, since its afixed package but for what its worth I think ala carte will be the death of affordable programming.
     
  14. Dec 9, 2007 #114 of 124
    narcolept

    narcolept Godfather

    355
    0
    Mar 1, 2007
    So do I, but it somewhat fits the "small groups of channels for $x" that some people would kill to have.
     
  15. Dec 9, 2007 #115 of 124
    flipptyfloppity

    flipptyfloppity New Member

    1,073
    0
    Aug 20, 2007
    Very judgment of Solomon. Like many compromises, this one seems destined to guarantee both sides are equally displeased.

    Not now Mark has 13 months to figure out how to either make a go of HDNet as a "free" channel or build loyalty so he can bring them to him when he does get kicked into a separate pack.
     
  16. Dec 9, 2007 #116 of 124
    brian188

    brian188 Legend

    137
    0
    Oct 13, 2007
    I will NEVER "buy" anything Mark Cuban or NBC has to offer. So it is a big No on the 4.99 regardless.
     
  17. Dec 9, 2007 #117 of 124
    smiddy

    smiddy Tain't ogre til its ogre

    15,654
    121
    Apr 5, 2006
    I watch a lot of HDNet. I was so close to putting the HD Extra Package on my account...now I will not. I rarely if ever watch the other channels in the current package. However...DirecTV may change their strategy. This was to be effective December 15, 2007 if I am remembering right. A lot can change in the next week. Let's see what happens. BTW, all those who already opted for the HD Extra Package are likely going to be reconsidering their positions too. I think this coming week will have some interesting announcements from DirecTV with regard to packages.
     
  18. Dec 9, 2007 #118 of 124
    Sirshagg

    Sirshagg Hall Of Fame

    4,922
    0
    Dec 29, 2006
    I tend to agree - it is alot like ala carte. However there are two key differences, at least for me. 1) It's still a package of unrelated channels. I may want HDnet but not the other channels in the package so why should I pay for them all. The only real difference here is that the package is rather small but it's still a package and not truely ala carte. 2) They took some channels I have been receiving for years away and are telling me that if I want them back I'll have to pay extra for them. I dont want to make this into more than it is but that sounds like type of thing that criminals normally do.

    I for one certainly don't question Earls motives on this as he is just he messenger and I greatly appreciate the info all that he does fot the forum and the info that he passes along.

    In the end I'm really happy with the apparent outcome since HDNet was the only channel being taken away that i cared about.
     
  19. Dec 9, 2007 #119 of 124
    Kenkong586

    Kenkong586 Legend

    160
    0
    Apr 3, 2007
    Too bad, I really enjoyed HDNET Movies, they always kept the true aspect ratio and even showed commercials for a society supports original film aspects. I really enjoyed the Hitchcock films they've shown recently and just last week they showed Duel in 4x3 OAR and it was beautiful.
     
  20. Dec 9, 2007 #120 of 124
    ziggy29

    ziggy29 Icon

    691
    2
    Nov 18, 2004
    San Antonio DMA
    I agree. I really like the programming Smithsonian has -- and I love the lack of commercials -- but there's little incentive to pay extra for it unless they produce enough new programming each month to justify the cost. And so far, I'm just not seeing it. The program guide usually shows nothing but stuff I've already seen.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page