1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DIRECTV HD Channel Anticipation (Official Q3-12 Thread)

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by Mike Bertelson, Jun 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aug 2, 2012 #1081 of 3975
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,397
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    It's simply not all right to denigrate (look that up in your Funk and Wagnalls*! :D) channels you see no value in.



    * Referencing the late Dan Rowan and Dick Martin....
     
  2. Aug 2, 2012 #1082 of 3975
    mnassour

    mnassour Icon

    859
    9
    Apr 23, 2002
    After all that's been said and done here about those, you do have a death wish, don't you? :lol:
     
  3. Aug 2, 2012 #1083 of 3975
    fleckrj

    fleckrj Icon

    1,569
    146
    Sep 4, 2009
    Cary, NC
    This just proves what I have been saying for a long time. There are no "missing basics" that are going to be appreciated by the majority of customers. All of the "must have" basics are already in HD. What are left to be added, while extremely appealing to a small segment of the market, are, in fact, niche channels. None of the "missing" channels will be wanted by everyone.

    Now, just get rid of E! and give me Universal Sports, and I will be happy :D
     
  4. Aug 2, 2012 #1084 of 3975
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    You are right. But that's not going to happen.....

    ....if BBC America goes HD, you will hear the DIY, H2 and NatGeoWild fans stamping their feet. If DIY goes HD..... well, you get the idea. When something launches in HD, you will have people who like it, and people who won't like it much. You can't please everyone.

    You can't even go to Dish anymore because of lack of AMC. :D
     
  5. Aug 2, 2012 #1085 of 3975
    Alan Gordon

    Alan Gordon Chancellor

    9,094
    100
    Jun 7, 2004
    Dawson, Georgia
    I'm not sure how quoting three people proves that. :confused:


    Very few, if any, channel(s) appeals to everyone.

    I feel that the goal of any good provider is not only to offer the most popular channels, but to offer a good assortment of channels that appeals to multiple demographics.

    ~Alan
     
  6. Aug 2, 2012 #1086 of 3975
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    If Universal Sports ever goes HD, I will be VERY happy! :grin:
     
  7. Aug 2, 2012 #1087 of 3975
    cypherx

    cypherx Hall Of Fame

    3,472
    68
    Aug 27, 2010
    PA - Berks...
    If BBCA arrives in HD I will be very happy. I'll just have to ask, can DIY HD come to the party too? :)
     
  8. Aug 2, 2012 #1088 of 3975
    Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003
    It's no big deal. Nothing is on it.
     
  9. Aug 2, 2012 #1089 of 3975
    ep1974

    ep1974 Legend

    645
    24
    May 22, 2010
    I agree. I know everyone has their preferences and you can't please all, but I would really like to know how Shorts HD stacks up as far as ratings(viewership) go.
     
  10. Aug 2, 2012 #1090 of 3975
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,397
    585
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    I don't care if only the dozen or so folks in forum who've said they like it are the only audience; I like it! BTW, only a few guys here might know the answer, and they sure as hell won't say.

    I could name several dozen channels- as we all can- that are worthless to me, perhaps even make some valid (to me) criticisms of them, etc. , but it just ain't right to critique other's choices on a semi public forum.
     
  11. Aug 2, 2012 #1091 of 3975
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Yes. Directv should dump Shorts. Obviously, it is the sole reason that they have not added a dozen or so channels. You know, for blocking all those channels, it really doesn't have that great a picture quality.
     
  12. Aug 2, 2012 #1092 of 3975
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
  13. Aug 2, 2012 #1093 of 3975
    TheRatPatrol

    TheRatPatrol Hall Of Fame

    7,347
    243
    Oct 1, 2003
    Phoenix, AZ
    Maybe after D14?
     
  14. Aug 2, 2012 #1094 of 3975
    yosoyellobo

    yosoyellobo Icon

    2,816
    187
    Nov 1, 2006
    Jacksonville Fl
    When will the D14 anticipation thread start?:)
     
  15. Aug 2, 2012 #1095 of 3975
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    I doubt it. D14 will give us more bandwidth, yes. But they also need to start thinking of retiring some older satellites, and they may need part of that satellite to move some older satellite's stations on to at some point. They will probably also have a lot of other things in the pipeline, like new push-content for local commercials and what not.

    D14 will provide more bandwidth, but don't think it is the Messiah of all things Basic HD, because besides the fact there probably won't be ROOM for all that STILL, they still have to negotiate contracts and what not, and they may launch more sports, premiums, and PPV.
     
  16. Aug 2, 2012 #1096 of 3975
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    If they really wanted to make the Extra Pack a money-maker, they'd put a couple of these (currently missing) basic HD in it while leaving the associated SD in the basic category.

    Oh yes, I know there would be screams of pain and outrage. . .from some. Others of us would be happy to pay for the privilege *of getting what we want* at a reasonable price. And I bet D* would do better net-net on extra income from doing it than from the few who would actually quit in outrage (rather than the many who would claim they will, but won't).

    At least as an interim solution, pre-D14.
     
  17. Aug 2, 2012 #1097 of 3975
    JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    4,697
    39
    Jul 21, 2008
    I don't directv to be like a crappy cable system where SD and HD do not have the same number.
     
  18. Aug 2, 2012 #1098 of 3975
    Mike Bertelson

    Mike Bertelson 6EQUJ5 WOW! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    14,043
    94
    Jan 24, 2007
    OK people, discuss the topic and not each other. Make your point without the personal comments or your post is gone.

    :backtotop

    Mike
     
  19. Aug 2, 2012 #1099 of 3975
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    I do agree with that at a meta level. I just don't think that 2-4 channels out of a couple hundred, and hopefully on a relatively temporary basis (couple years, until D14 is up), is a more important consideration than having those channels available to those willing to pay extra for them.

    I assume that any time D* can come up with the economic case, it improves our chances of actually getting what we want made available to us. So making suggestions that would provide added revenue, IMO, is a matter of my furthering my own self-interest.

    Everything is a trade-off, even buying new 6-per encoders and infrastructure, vs expected added revenue (if any).

    With smaller, intense fanbases (which certainly covers some channels like BBCAHD, DIYHD, and a few others), leveraging the "intense" part can provide extra revenue, and thus make it more likely we actually get access to what we want.

    Also, my apologies to Tonyd79 if he saw the part of my post that Mike snipped, and agreed with Mike's assessment of it. I did not intend, nor understand, that snipped text to be aimed at him. I understood him to be commenting on unnamed others as a group (not specific individuals), and I was agreeing with him, not criticizing him.
     
  20. Aug 2, 2012 #1100 of 3975
    steinmeg

    steinmeg Legend

    169
    0
    Nov 23, 2006
    +1 & +2
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page