1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DIRECTV HD Channel Anticipation (Official Q4-12 Thread)

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by Mike Bertelson, Sep 24, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Oct 2, 2012 #81 of 808
    Alan Gordon

    Alan Gordon Chancellor

    9,094
    100
    Jun 7, 2004
    Dawson, Georgia
    They've already started with some sports channels like NASCAR, UEFA, and like you, I expect some of the sports packages to be transferred over first.

    ... but I'm intrigued by their plans beyond them. HBO? Cinemax?! Starz?! Some of the LiL markets on 119 are smaller and less expensive to transfer over, so will they go that route, or will we see more aggressive moves?

    ~Alan
     
  2. Oct 2, 2012 #82 of 808
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,102
    Nov 13, 2006
    I was unaware the NASCAR was only in Hi Definition. Interesting.
     
  3. Oct 2, 2012 #83 of 808
    coolman302003

    coolman302003 2014 NBA CHAMPIONS!

    1,810
    96
    Jun 2, 2008
    Southeast
  4. Oct 2, 2012 #84 of 808
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    And I think they already announced 2 years ago they would be "ready" for Ultra HD, so they are now announcing that they are indeed preparing for it.
     
  5. Oct 2, 2012 #85 of 808
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    I see now.... I should probably read better. :D

    Still, I think they will convert to HD first on the new D14 and D15 satellites, but not yet immediately drop SD. They can pretty much keep SD going until the first Ultra-HD broadcasts are launched, and then - perhaps also as an incentive to SD customers that still exist by then - start dropping 20% of all SD, and launch a number of Ultra-HD stations. They don't have to drop everything all at once, and it is probably smart to do it that way so they can gradually convert everyone. Drop some, back-fill it with Ultra HD. - Now some customers will start to migrate. Drop some more, backfill with Ultra HD, now more customers will start to migrated. Etc, etc, etc.... until you reach the bare basics with SD to provide to the last hold outs.

    And you can continue doing that as long as the SD bandwidth is not immediately needed.
     
  6. Oct 2, 2012 #86 of 808
    Alan Gordon

    Alan Gordon Chancellor

    9,094
    100
    Jun 7, 2004
    Dawson, Georgia
    The HOTPASS channels require MPEG4 equipment... I think....

    ~Alan
     
  7. Oct 2, 2012 #87 of 808
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Is there any mpeg2 hd left on directv?
     
  8. Oct 2, 2012 #88 of 808
    Alan Gordon

    Alan Gordon Chancellor

    9,094
    100
    Jun 7, 2004
    Dawson, Georgia
    No... but there is MPEG2 SD left...

    ~Alan
     
  9. Oct 2, 2012 #89 of 808
    Drucifer

    Drucifer Well-Known Member

    9,407
    244
    Feb 12, 2009
    NY Hudson...
    Have no mo' wants. Just two it would be nice.

    And those two are
    • H2
    • MILT
     
  10. Oct 2, 2012 #90 of 808
    Alan Gordon

    Alan Gordon Chancellor

    9,094
    100
    Jun 7, 2004
    Dawson, Georgia
    IF this is indeed their plan, I see a slow gradual change as well.

    However... I believe we'll see more results of this plan prior to D14 being put into action.... whether it's sports channels, premium channels, local markets, etc.

    ~Alan
     
  11. Oct 2, 2012 #91 of 808
    Drucifer

    Drucifer Well-Known Member

    9,407
    244
    Feb 12, 2009
    NY Hudson...
    Well marketing would luv to advertise an all HD system. The first sat system there is going to strike gold.
     
  12. Oct 2, 2012 #92 of 808
    Ken984

    Ken984 Active Member

    1,152
    9
    Dec 31, 2005
    Bossier...
    Technically VOOM was first there, but they had some oddball channels and not enough bandwidth to ever make it viable to overtake Dish/DirecTV.
     
  13. Oct 2, 2012 #93 of 808
    PrinceLH

    PrinceLH New Member

    490
    8
    Feb 18, 2003
    I wonder how many Ultra HD channels will fit on a transponder? I remember when they could only put two to a transponder, in the early days. What are they up to currently? 5? 6? I wonder what technology they will have, in 2016, to make it viable.
     
  14. Oct 2, 2012 #94 of 808
    MysteryMan

    MysteryMan Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    8,514
    532
    May 17, 2010
    USA
    They will probably start with a handful of Ultra HD channels like they are doing with 3D. Today's 4K sets are in the $25,000.00 price range. The average consumer doesn't have that type of buying power. So until these sets come down to a consumer affordable price the demand for Ultra HD will be limited.
     
  15. Oct 2, 2012 #95 of 808
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,102
    Nov 13, 2006
    I think the first step in the conversion to all mpeg4, which will mean all hd capable equipment, will be no longer selling any sd equipment to new subscribers, only hd equipment, and I think that is coming soon, very very soon. We will see though. Some of it will depend on how much more inventory they have sitting around right now.
     
  16. Oct 2, 2012 #96 of 808
    Chrismon1001

    Chrismon1001 AllStar

    73
    0
    Apr 3, 2011
    Fox Soccer Plus in full time would be awesome. The rest of the premiums in HD like HBO Family West, The Movie Channel West, OuterMax, Encore Channels, Flix, Sundance, IFC, All Epix Channels. Others that I want include H2, Cooking Channel, Bloomberg, NASA, Fuse, Longhorn, Pac-12, and Time Warner Sports Network. Lastly C-SPAN 1,2,3, Fox Movie Channel, and Lifetime Movie Network later on.
     
  17. Oct 3, 2012 #97 of 808
    HarleyD

    HarleyD Hall Of Fame

    1,357
    62
    Aug 31, 2006
    So if 4K starts to take hold in 2016 what's the over/under on some number of the posters here starting to call HDTV "unwatchable"?
     
  18. Oct 3, 2012 #98 of 808
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    2016 is the target year to move all channels to HD, it does not mean that 4k launches by then, it only means that DirecTV is making room for it.

    It is estimated there may be some commercial broadcasting in 4k by 2016, but I have also heard estimates of 2018. How many stations will convert to 4k? Who knows.... I am thinking it will start with some sports, then maybe some of the broadcast networks, and then channels like Discovery, perhaps HBO.

    As far as people complaining..... there will always be complainers. :D
     
  19. Oct 3, 2012 #99 of 808
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    CURRENTLY, and I put that in CAPS on purpose, a 4k HD feed takes about 100 Mbps in testing scenarios, but that is only lightly compressed and served more as a showcase than anything else.

    4k HD is basically, using Clinton's arithmetic, 4 1920x1080 resolution screens in a 2x2 square, resolution wise. One could then surmise that if a current HD station on DirecTV takes roughly 6.5-7 Mbps in MPEG4 compression, that a UltraHD station would be around 25 Mbps. Perhaps with better compression algorithms and faster unit processors, by 2016 they would probably be able to place a crystal-clear Ultra HD picture in about 18-20 Mbps bandwidth, so from a transponder point of view, based on current setups, that would mean about 2 Ultra HD per transponder.
     
  20. Oct 3, 2012 #100 of 808
    mreposter

    mreposter Hall Of Fame

    1,711
    1
    Jul 29, 2006
    People adopt new TV technologies very slowly. It's taken about a dozen years for Direct'v HD penetration to get to 50%. So even today, nearly half of highly progressive Directv's customers are watching SD.

    Even if D* launches a small number of Ultra channels in the 2016 timeframe, it will likely take years for a large enough customer base to build up before it becomes a real driving factor.

    The move to HD had had two big advantages - an obvious selling feature in a much better picture - and the move to much larger displays. Back in the late 90s SD looked pretty good on common 27" sets. But by the mid 2000s 32-40" flat screens were increasingly popular, driving people's interest in the better HD picture. Ultra may be a better picture, but will it really have as big an advantage as the move to HD?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page