1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTv RVU Client Boxes - When ?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV HD DVR/Receiver Discussion' started by jeremymc7, Jan 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. carl6

    carl6 Moderator Staff Member DBSTalk Club

    Nov 15, 2005
    Seattle, WA
    Until more information is available, I wouldn't speculate one way or the other. I've seen nothing to suggest your cons (for or against). You might be pleasantly surprised.
  2. RAD

    RAD Well-Known Member

    Aug 5, 2002
    I'm also going to be interested in the initial pricing of the client, does it cause a new commitment, is it an accessory like AM21's that aren't covered by protection plans.
  3. LoweBoy

    LoweBoy Legend

    Sep 15, 2006
    I am a big fan of pleasant surprises!
  4. LameLefty

    LameLefty I used to be a rocket scientist

    Sep 28, 2006
    I'm with Carl on this; I try to avoid speculating about features (or lack of features) in unannounced products. That way when the facts come out, I'll be able to make a judgment on how I like, it unspoiled by perceived shortcomings compared to the speculation. I can simply ask myself: does this {widget} have or do {whatever it is I personally want it to}. If the pros outweigh the cons, I like it. If not, I don't. Pretty simple, really. :)
  5. amenic

    amenic Cool Member

    Apr 9, 2012
    It is barely mentioned in DTVs info. They haven't educated their agents about it and if they really wanted to there wouldn't be much stopping them from scrapping it and waiting for a C32. The limited beta testing will probably be several months of only being available to a handfull of areas or groups, just like with the HR34. Which is probably a good thing, because new releases tend to be REALLY glitchy; most likely the reason HR34 was released by itself, aside from being quite a handfull to understand and explain.
  6. slapshot54

    slapshot54 Cool Member

    Sep 3, 2011
    Did you not read stuart's post? Hes posting a first look coming up here in a few days. 99% they're not gonna scrap it now.
  7. harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    Because that will be the time that the DECA fanboys (and DIRECTV apologists) can claim that DECA can be used across the board. Until then, some sort of adapter must be used to change media to CAT5 or WiFi -- the widely deployed networking technologies of today.

    I've never been a big fan of reasoning that DIRECTV installers aren't capable of anything but RG6.
  8. veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    Dec 9, 2006
    So as a Dish sub, how are your installers handling this?
    Hasn't Dish also gone to MoCA?

    Basically you're asking an installer & the customer service people to become proficient with:

    1. Coax
    2. Ethernet
    3. WiFi
    So you want your auto mechanic to also service your washing machine too?
    Maybe your Doctor can take a look at you home plumbing while he's at it too? :confused: :nono:
  9. LameLefty

    LameLefty I used to be a rocket scientist

    Sep 28, 2006
    You're repeating yourself, and I've already responded to this point on August 15, which you sidestepped with a poorly-disguised strawman argument.


    Thanks for playing our game. We have some lovely parting gifts for you.
  10. dielray

    dielray Legend

    Aug 5, 2009
    Why would they? The vast majority of homes do not have Cat5/6 pre-ran to each room, but many have coax. DECA allows the existing wires to be reused without having to run new lines.

    It is simpler and less time consuming to run 1 coax to a room instead of coax and twisted pair.

    Since the homes with both is such a rare situation, it just doesn't make sense to support a fringe situation. Supporting it would mean additional training and material costs. It would also rely too much on customer equipment.
  11. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    Actually, RG6 cable is a really robust way of getting data across any building. 10BaseT (and later 100BaseT and 1000BaseT) didn't take off because it was better, but because it was cheaper. At the time (and I was there) every building was prewired with tons of twisted pair for telephone use. 10BaseT could go through telephone conduits while coax couldn't.

    Now what we're seeing is that networking in the home can work over coax or UTP and really, UTP isn't that enticing for most homeowners at this point. It's just another expense and most folks are just as happy with wi-fi.
  12. Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    I remember when the first Ethernet over twisted pair solution arrived (LatticeNet) - a lot of installations still used coax as the backbone between LatticeNet hubs. A number of buildings were wired with thick Ethernet (10Base5) coax cable (RG-8) in the elevator shafts, with vampire taps running DIX (Digital, Intel, Xerox) cable back to managed hubs. Coaxial cable is superior, as a networking cable, to twisted pair in almost every way except cost.

    I would submit that the "widely deployed networking technologies" of today in most homes are WiFi and coax, not UTP.
  13. harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    DISH can use MoCA where it is easier, but it is NOT required. The Joeys run just fine off of the other technologies.
    It isn't like the difference between gasoline and diesel power. For its part, Ethernet is a very simple current loop setup and WiFi either works or it doesn't. If an installer gets hung up in passwords, they probably shouldn't be installing.
  14. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    Jun 18, 2006
    This thread has gone off topic and the initial question has obviously been answered. If there are additional questions please feel free to start additional threads.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page