1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV/Viacom Dispute?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by danpeters, Jul 9, 2012.

  1. Jul 10, 2012 #81 of 3058
    zimm7778

    zimm7778 Hall Of Fame

    1,201
    5
    Nov 11, 2007
    Is Lifetime not part of Viacom? For some reason I thought they were.
     
  2. Jul 10, 2012 #82 of 3058
    mws192

    mws192 Godfather

    535
    29
    Jun 17, 2010
    A+E Networks (Hearst, ABC/Disney & Comcast)
     
  3. Jul 10, 2012 #83 of 3058
    hancox

    hancox Godfather

    505
    17
    Jun 23, 2004
    Erm, sort of. Good luck getting local baseball (blacked out), local college sports (blacked out for some, if not most), local hockey, etc.

    Exclusive cable RSN's really make cutting the cord, for a sports fan, very very difficult.
     
  4. Jul 10, 2012 #84 of 3058
    snappjay

    snappjay Legend

    107
    0
    Jul 16, 2010
    I've usually been okay with disputes, but these are some very popular channels...
    No matter what, we lose. Either our bill stays the same and we lose a huge chunk of channels, or we keep the channels and the extra cost is passed to us.

    My wife and I have discussed dropping pay TV completely, "cutting the cord" if you will, and this might be the tipping point. We have an Apple TV and an iPad, so that gets us Hulu (airplay), netflix, mlb, nhl, and nba.
     
  5. Jul 10, 2012 #85 of 3058
    TravelFan1

    TravelFan1 Legend

    233
    9
    Apr 1, 2009
    I have to ask the moderators: Why isn't this thread under "Directv Programming"? I really think Programming is much more appropriate than "General Discussion".
     
  6. Jul 10, 2012 #86 of 3058
    Drew2k

    Drew2k New Member

    14,514
    228
    Aug 16, 2006
    At least I got to watch Teen Wolf on MTV last night without any banners or screen crawls...

    I read the press release from DIRECTV, stating that Viacom is forcing DIRECTV to take the channels down, and then I read the press release from Viacom which states DIRECTV will take the channels down. If Viacom is indeed forcing DIRECTV to go black on those channels, then Viacom needs to own up to that, rather than make it appear DIRECTV is doing this on its own.
     
  7. Jul 10, 2012 #87 of 3058
    Carl Spock

    Carl Spock Superfly

    4,567
    0
    Sep 3, 2004
    It's just like high school, only with larger stakes.
     
  8. Jul 10, 2012 #88 of 3058
    JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    4,641
    34
    Jul 21, 2008
    So this is EPIX plan to get carriage???? and 30% more may be the cost of EPIX?
     
  9. Jul 10, 2012 #89 of 3058
    TravelFan1

    TravelFan1 Legend

    233
    9
    Apr 1, 2009
    I would rather have all these crappy channels dropped. There isnt' a single one that my family watches. I used to watch MTV back when M standed for Music... Nowadays, reality crap, I don't give a rat's.... Once in a blue moon, i catch an old show on Nick at Nite, like Wonder Years. I like South Park, but there are so many alternative ways to watch it. The 2 shows I'd miss from comedy Central are the Daily Show and Colbert, but I can live w/out them.

    So, if like you are saying on twitter, #DirectvHasMyBack, then drop all of these crappy channels and add beInSports HD, BBC America HD and Fox Deportes HD!
     
  10. Jul 10, 2012 #90 of 3058
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Yes you can get all these sports via the internet, but it will cost you almost as much as DirecTV itself. I am not someone that watches all teams and all sports, I follow a few specific teams, being MLB Angels, NHL Ducks, and MLS Galaxy.

    If I want to watch the Angels online, I have to pay for their FULL package that gets me all the teams. If I want to see the Ducks, I have to pay for the FULL NHL package. If I want to see the L.A. Galaxy, I would have to pay for the FULL MLS package.

    By the time I done dishing out money just so I can see those three teams, I have already spent almost the same money I give DirecTV over a period of about 6 months. And if you happen to like NBA on top of that (which I don't) or want to watch some other sports that sell packages online, you are starting to close in to the amount you pay DirecTV for the year....

    On top of that, there are plenty of channels I do watch, plenty of stuff I record, and the ease of being able to walk into the living room in the morning, turning on the TV with the remote, switching to CNN for the morning news, is worth some money to me. And there happens to be a channel that doesn't even stream online.

    The EASE of a product like a TV carrier is worth money to me. I don't want to go put a computer next to every TV just so I can browse to MLB EI Online streaming to find the game I want to watch, I just want to flip on the TV and press channel 692 or 693, and there is my Angels game. PLUS I want to be able to switch to the Dodgers channel easily in between innings just to see how their game is going, they often play at the same time. Not wait to start buffering the Dodgers stream, and then waiting to start the Angels stream again.

    Cutting the cord is a hassle. Every online service uses its own streaming service, it uses its own billing system, one device might not be able to stream everything. If you want to use a Roku with movies/TV you bought through iTunes, you have to have a PC with software installed called Plex, and then switch to the Plex channel on your Roku to be able to watch them. And there is bugs in that software too, it doesn't always work.

    Additionally, I don't always want to have to think about what I want to watch. Sometimes I just want to turn on the TV and.... simply see what is on. I might encounter an old re-run of MASH that I had not thought about. Or an interesting interview on PBS I would have never thought of watching. Or get hooked up in some stupid tow show where they are trying to repo someone's car or whatever that I would have never thought to start watching online.

    Sorry, but cutting the cord is simply said.... ANNOYING. DirecTV might cost me $100 a month or so, but it is worth the ease of mind and the ease of use for me.

    And I will keep subscribing to DirecTV, whether there are Viacom channels or not.
     
  11. Jul 10, 2012 #91 of 3058
    TravelFan1

    TravelFan1 Legend

    233
    9
    Apr 1, 2009
    http://whendirectvdrops.com/shows-youll-miss

    Of the list above, the only shows I watched from time to time are South Park, daily Show and Colbert Report. My Gosh, I checked the list and I realized how much crap can an organization put out there!
     
  12. Jul 10, 2012 #92 of 3058
    BlackCoffee

    BlackCoffee AllStar

    57
    0
    May 23, 2009
    I will stand behind DirecTV in this fight. I may get a little complaining from the kids, but they are kids and don't have a vote.

    Personally, I might miss some of SPIKE, but overall most of these programs aren't worth the additional costs. More power to DirecTV for trying to hold costs down for it's customers.
     
  13. Jul 10, 2012 #93 of 3058
    zimm7778

    zimm7778 Hall Of Fame

    1,201
    5
    Nov 11, 2007
    That and the fact I don't want to buy a PS3 for the NFL.
     
  14. Jul 10, 2012 #94 of 3058
    zimm7778

    zimm7778 Hall Of Fame

    1,201
    5
    Nov 11, 2007
    I'm on the app so it doesn't show where you live. I assume you do not live in Southern California since baseball and hockey would black out you watching those live anyway. However, if you ordered the out of market sports packages on Directv then you would save a lot of $$$ by cutting the cord because you could pay for just those. It really depends on how you look at it. We moved from Jacksonville to Tampa in 2008. My son was 3'so I decided even though I didn't care about them I'd purposely try to raise my son as a fan of the Tampa teams and not the teams I was a fan of. I figured we'd be here in his formative years so I wanted him to grow up feeling totally part of the community he was in. As long as we can afford it and I don't think the majority of channels become so trashy I can no longer justify the expense I don't want him to be denied being able to watch those teams which he would be if we cut the cord.
     
  15. Jul 10, 2012 #95 of 3058
    njfoses

    njfoses Legend

    145
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    Atlanta
    As much as i hate to say it even if these channels go dark there is a 0% chance mtv stays dark once jersey shore starts this season. To many viewers and bad publicity.
     
  16. Jul 10, 2012 #96 of 3058
    SPACEMAKER

    SPACEMAKER Freethinker

    3,183
    16
    Dec 11, 2007
    Mason, MI
    Sometimes I like to watch mindless crap. Not often but sometimes. My 8yr old watches a few shows on Nick but he'd obviously survive. But those of us here don't represent the masses. There is a huge number of people who would freak out and cancel if Viacom went dark for any length of time. A deal will get done because neither side wants to go dark. But the good thing about this is that it allows posters to come here and boast their superiority over others due to these channels being beneath them.
     
  17. Jul 10, 2012 #97 of 3058
    SPACEMAKER

    SPACEMAKER Freethinker

    3,183
    16
    Dec 11, 2007
    Mason, MI
    Also, right now there is a Viacom ad at the bottom of the DBSTalk Android app encouraging people to call DIRECTV to protest.
     
  18. Jul 10, 2012 #98 of 3058
    DaveC27

    DaveC27 Godfather

    276
    5
    Apr 14, 2010
  19. Jul 10, 2012 #99 of 3058
  20. Jul 10, 2012 #100 of 3058
    Justin23

    Justin23 Hall Of Fame

    1,218
    1
    Jan 10, 2008
    I think Nick@Nite is the missing one. Even though it is broadcast on the Nick channel, I think they count it as a separate "channel".

    From Wikipedia: Nick@Nite broadcasts over the channel space of Nickelodeon on Sundays through Thursdays from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m., Fridays from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. and Saturdays from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. (Eastern and Pacific Time). Though it shares channel space with Nickelodeon, The Nielsen Company rates Nick at Nite as a separate channel from Nickelodeon for ratings purposes. Since Nick at Nite and Nickelodeon are commonly considered as two individual channels that share the same channel space, the two services are sometimes referred to under the collective name 'Nickelodeon/Nick at Nite'.
     

Share This Page