1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV/Viacom Dispute?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by danpeters, Jul 9, 2012.

  1. Button Pusher

    Button Pusher Icon DBSTalk Club

    971
    0
    Jan 19, 2007
    The...
    My 18 year old is upset. She lost all her favorite shows and channels! lol I told her maybe it was time to grow up and watch some adult shows! :lol: That didn't go over to well! :nono2:
     
  2. dxtrfn80

    dxtrfn80 Mentor

    41
    0
    Apr 17, 2012
    She told the kids to try Phineas and Ferb again tomorrow morning and they may like it as was fun for her to watch when she watched it one day while the kids were outside with their friends and their dad. Sometimes not having one show can lead to some new shows and activities. Get out and play it is nice in the mornings before the heat starts in the afternoon.
     
  3. Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears

    6,081
    46
    Mar 18, 2008

    I think the statement that they don't care is false. I know most people care about it. Now different people might care for different reasons. So I would say that DIRECTV does care and VIACOM does care. However the reasons for caring might be different. DIRECTV cares because at the end of the day having happy customers generates them capital and having unhappy customers doesn't. So this is a long term goal knowing that in the mean time there will be unhappy customer's but not as many as if they had to have a larger price increase. VIACOM cares because they want eyes on their programs and don't want people to learn to stop looking for it. They know that happy viewers remain viewers.

    Now you could say that not everyone cares for the same reason or the same level as people because that would be true.
     
  4. jdskycaster

    jdskycaster Legend

    278
    7
    Sep 1, 2008
    How is your point still valid? In one sentence you say Viacom has other options. On the other hand you say those same options are not viable because these outlets are successful due to their low prices?

    Netflix could not afford a major increase in rates anymore than DTV can and would be and are in the same boat. They already tried to increase rates a year ago and that worked out really well for them.:rolleyes:
     
  5. Darth Malgus

    Darth Malgus Cool Member

    25
    0
    Jul 4, 2012



    This example is not even close to what is going on here. Viacom is not listing its channels at a set price for all to purchase. A better example would be if you were instead renting a home and subleasing it at a certain price. Then when your lease expires the owner of the property says you can stay if you pay me %30 more of the term of the next lease for the same home you currently live in, without any improvements or maintenance on my part. You then have some choices.

    1. Move on to a place with better rent, leaving your tenant who is sub-leasing out of luck.

    2. Pass the expense of the increase on to your tenant if your lease allows you to.

    3. Absorb the increase yourself putting yourself at a financial disadvantage, and hurting any future plans you had for the profits you were making with this arrangement.

    4. Negotiate with the owner of the property. "I am already here, if I move you will have a span of time in which you are not collecting my rent for your empty property, which you still must pay taxes on at the end of the year. It is more beneficial for both of us if we can come to an agreement that will allow you to keep your income, and save me the cost of moving, and finding a new place. I'm sure we can work out a deal". Which is what D* tried to do, and basically the property owner evicted them while the negotiations were going on.



    See the difference?
     
  6. Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears

    6,081
    46
    Mar 18, 2008
    Damn I missed that memo.
     
  7. Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears

    6,081
    46
    Mar 18, 2008
    Correct and look how much content they have lost in their streaming compared to what they have added. I sign up for Netflix about once a year for a couple of months but I always end up canceling it after a couple of months because after the initial jonesing of a show is over there's not much content for me to care about worth paying for.
     
  8. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    We're essentially saying the same thing. I feel directv cares only in so far as keeping me happy keeps me spending money with them. Hash tags like #directvhasmyback are misrepresenting their intentions. If said - hey we can't support this increase becuase its too much burden to place on our customers. They already spend more with us than they would with our competitors, if we pass this on, they'll leave us and that hurts our bottom line. Maybe its a slight different, but i respect it a heck of a lot more than falsely pretending to be my buddy.
     
  9. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    You need to look at NF as a competiting video distribution provider becuase that's what it is. Its a 20MM strong online streaming video distribution network. That's how directv sees it - that's how Viacom sees it.

    Your usage of the service - while perfect for you - probably isn't representative for the whole.

    NF isn't going away - they are willing to pay for their content, and they look ever more appealing to the Viacoms of the world when the Directvs of the world start shutting them out. Directv is the harbinger of its own doom if it takes this too far.
     
  10. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    I said viacom has other options to withstand mid term revenue loss. And they do. Netflix streaming wasn't around 5 years ago. neither was hulu. Neither was Amazon Video prime. All of those companies are willing to put up major cash to Viacom and other programmers. NF alone said it was willing to pay out nearly $2B in programming costs this year to bolster is streaming library. That's not chump change.

    I never made the other statement.
     
  11. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Right. Because Viacom will not start raising prices on Netflix which does what he does because it is a cheap service. If they become a real player vis a vis cable and satellite, then the prices go up as does the price of Netflix. As does the price of Internet.

    I see the Netflix model as even less viable down the road than satellite or cable. They are living in the moment.
     
  12. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    That's not true - fees have already started to get raised on them. Starz for example got 30M a year in their first deal, and demanded more than $500 for their next. It's why Starz content is no longer on NF.

    And as far as their model - they are just a different version of Cable and Sat. A non-telco on demand IPTV service is the most apt comparison. Its equally as valid if they can figure out how to get more content. And they'll figure that out quickly if Viacom and the like are no longer feeling beholden to their Cable/Sat partners. The only reason they stay away from netflix now if their traditional bed fellows prefer that they do so. But that changes if D* is no longer in the picture.
     
  13. BattleScott

    BattleScott Hall Of Fame

    2,353
    7
    Aug 28, 2006
    If you want to watch Viacom programming, then DirecTV is the one you need to stand up to. Switch providers to someone who is carrying Viacom.

    If you don't think Viacom programming is worth any additional money, then you are already standing up to them by staying with DirecTV.

    Viacom is hoping you will go the first route, DirecTV is hoping for the second. So, the only way to truly stand up to BOTH of them is to take your ball and go home.
     
  14. jdskycaster

    jdskycaster Legend

    278
    7
    Sep 1, 2008
    Correct, and furthermore let's see how viable the NF model is when they have to double or even triple their subcriber fees.

    I dropped physical media from my NF subscription when they raised rates on me last year (as did hundreds of thousands of other subs). I recently dumped my streaming service as I had not watched anything of value in the last 6 months. I do however maintain Amazon Prime because I like the express shipping options and I purchase a ton of goods from Amazon. Their streaming video service is merely a bonus but would not come close to replacing my sat provider.
     
  15. Bradman

    Bradman Mentor

    86
    9
    Aug 8, 2011
    Cool story, bro.:rolleyes:
     
  16. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    You just made my point. They fail quickly when the prices go up. And, no, they are not the same model. They do not own the pipeline which cable and satellite do. Huge difference.
     
  17. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    People are already comfortable paying sat and cable $150 month. $25 - $75 for NF is a relative steal.

    Cost won't be NF problem. Bandwidth caps are another story.
     
  18. jdskycaster

    jdskycaster Legend

    278
    7
    Sep 1, 2008
    I personally applaud DTV for standing up to Viacom just as I did Dish standing up to AMC. Something has to change and no change has ever been affected by maintaining status quo. I will live without AMC on Dish - I can get it elsewhere if I feel it is worth the price they are asking per show. Although I think losing 17 channels is a bit tougher to swallow I can honestly say if Dish were in the same situation I would want them to react the same way as DTV.
     
  19. MartyS

    MartyS New Member

    2,104
    3
    Dec 29, 2006
    I'm simply amazed at the number of lawyers and accountants we have on DBSTalk.
     
  20. tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    That's a fair point on the pipes. You are correct there.

    But i think it's more an issue of not wanting to maintain two $100 services not a reluctance to pay NF $100 if the content is there.
     

Share This Page