1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Dish AutoHop vs Networks Commercial Skipping Discussion

Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by phrelin, May 15, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. May 21, 2012 #61 of 695
    MikeW

    MikeW Hall Of Fame

    2,565
    4
    May 16, 2002
    I agree with James. This will only fan the flames for the retrans fees. In the end, we will be paying more for content because of this feature.
     
  2. May 21, 2012 #62 of 695
    Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003
    +1
     
  3. May 21, 2012 #63 of 695
    oldschoolecw

    oldschoolecw HarpoonIPA

    1,550
    35
    Jan 25, 2007
    Halifax, MA
    Agreed but
    Not in our life time :lol:
     
  4. May 21, 2012 #64 of 695
    pfred

    pfred Mentor

    47
    0
    Feb 8, 2009
    I am wondering how it knows where the ads are. If it is some signal, couldn't they just stop transmitting the ad start/stop signal?
     
  5. May 21, 2012 #65 of 695
    SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,262
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    They're not hurting. The entertainment industry is one of the few that has been going strong for the last few years while almost everybody else was hurting.

    They're hurting us by extorting higher fees. We're not hurting them by not watching commercials. They get paid for the commercials whether anyone watches them or not.
     
  6. May 21, 2012 #66 of 695
    Jason Whiddon

    Jason Whiddon Hall Of Fame

    2,314
    34
    Aug 17, 2006
    The ad revenue is hurting, which is why you see $2.99 an episode on digital fronts and now higher licensing fees. Sure, CSB for example is doing well because of online sales and higher fees for their channels, but if you add a feature that further hurts ad revenue, that equals higher licensing fees down the road in my mind.
     
  7. May 21, 2012 #67 of 695
    oldschoolecw

    oldschoolecw HarpoonIPA

    1,550
    35
    Jan 25, 2007
    Halifax, MA
    I would think so

    And now that I think of it, wasn't there some kind of VHS VCR recorder that knew when to pause out commercials back in the mid 90's but never really worked?
     
  8. May 21, 2012 #68 of 695
    Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    7
    Apr 8, 2009
    Sounds like they've been talking to the RIAA / MPA legal team. :nono2:
    They're probably working on a way to subpoena your provider for records on how many commercials you've skipped. Then they'll sue for the damages for every Shark Vacuum and Activia you didn't buy. :lol:
     
  9. May 21, 2012 #69 of 695
    SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,262
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    If so, it's because less people are watching, moving to on-line methods, or DVDs or other methods, or just not watching TV at all, not because they're skipping commercials (which many have been doing since the first VCRs came out).
     
  10. May 21, 2012 #70 of 695
    SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,262
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
  11. May 21, 2012 #71 of 695
    Jason Whiddon

    Jason Whiddon Hall Of Fame

    2,314
    34
    Aug 17, 2006
    Comparing todays DVR functions and use to VCR's is laughable at best. People are watching a lot less live TV than they used too, which devalues commercials. Im not defending them in any way, its just a fact. I got my first one tuner Dish DVR back in the day, and most people I knew didnt even have one.

    FFW'd to now, everyone I know with video service has a DVR. People paying for commercials realize this, so they expect to pay less. When this happens, CBS, etc... have to find other ways to produce costly series, plus other experimental shows that never make it. So when ad revenue decrease like it has lately, someone is going to pay. Going out of your way to make an obvious feature to bypass ads (which offers little value to a customer), is dumb, period. Their negotiating stance just took a hit when it comes to retrans fee time. As commercials are devalued, who pays for it? Us.
     
  12. May 21, 2012 #72 of 695
    Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    7
    Apr 8, 2009
  13. May 21, 2012 #73 of 695
    phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,053
    317
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
  14. May 21, 2012 #74 of 695
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,139
    28
    Sep 16, 2006
    But I bought a Shark Vacuum (really good vacuum btw). Does that exempt me?
     
  15. May 21, 2012 #75 of 695
    lacruz

    lacruz Legend

    117
    0
    Feb 24, 2005
    Great, another Dish Lawsuit on the horizon, which ultimately means higher subscriber fees to pay Charlie's lawyers.
     
  16. May 21, 2012 #76 of 695
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    22,661
    1,103
    Nov 13, 2006
    I am not sure this will come to lawsuits. I think its more likely to come to them not being able to get any more licensing deals without the new carriage deals expliciting saying, no more autohopp, or you pay me 10 times as much to have it on your service.
     
  17. May 21, 2012 #77 of 695
    inazsully

    inazsully Icon

    862
    13
    Oct 3, 2006
    Companies wonder why not enough people watch their ads resulting in loss of profits. They shouldn't blame DVR technology that allow customers to skip their ads, they should blame their own ad companies that puke out such stupid stupid ads that insult the customers intelligence to the point of making them run for the nearest barf bag. All they have to do is look at the Super Bowl when it comes to actual good ad writing. Those ads are so popular that they have their own awards show. My wife doesn't watch the game at all but wants me to call her to watch the ads.
     
  18. May 21, 2012 #78 of 695
    satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,024
    19
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    Yup, pretty much posted the same thing in the "networks are angry at Dish hopper" post that was moved to the hopper forum.

    I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees this as part of the problem.
     
  19. May 22, 2012 #79 of 695
    TheRatPatrol

    TheRatPatrol Hall Of Fame

    7,280
    209
    Oct 1, 2003
    Phoenix, AZ
    I wonder If this is the beginning to the end of skipping commercials?
     
  20. May 22, 2012 #80 of 695
    phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    15,053
    317
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    The really dumb part of this discussion is that by restructuring commercial placement - kind of random for no more than 60 seconds, 45 seconds being the ideal length, but occasionally running longer to keep us confused, with no distinguishing breaks - the networks could eliminate most commercial skipping. I've never really understood the "woe is me" view from advertising supported TV that crams four or more thirty-to-sixty second commercials into blocks of up to 4 minutes.

    And they could provide spots where local stations could "insert here" providing confidential advanced notice.

    And technology would allow it to be pretty automated, much like Auto Hop.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page