But it is spurious logic at work. Consider... They banned cellphone usage and the number of cellphone related incidents dropped from 100 to 53.. Why didn't it drop to 0? I mean, if you stop stepping on nails then nail-in-foot-stepping injuries should go away entirely, right? So... obviously cellphone-related incidents would go down if cellphone usage went down. That's like saying drownings went down because less people went to the lake! They could just as well have banned smoking in cars and smoking-related accidents would have dropped too. This is a lot like my bear-patrol example. I am the president and chief enforcer of the local bear patrol... and there have been ZERO bear attacks in my neighborhood for nearly 30 years now! So... my bear patrol must be working, right?