DTV lied again to me...

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by feeth, Jun 19, 2010.

  1. Jun 20, 2010 #21 of 162
    David MacLeod

    David MacLeod New Member

    5,689
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    seems to be happening more and more though, whether its due to lack of training or lack of professionalism it does not matter.
    when a customer is told through the only point of contact they have that item A will be replaced with item B then that is exactly what needs to happen.
    if the CSR is wrong, it does not matter. thats a CSR issue, they need to step up to the game or step out.
    the constant ineptitude of the CSR's is putting a strain notonly on customer relations but also on the installers who have to deal with the customer personally.
     
  2. Jun 20, 2010 #22 of 162
    raoul5788

    raoul5788 Guest

    1,481
    0
    May 13, 2006
    If your post is a veiled reference to satelliteguys, I disagree. As a member of both boards, I can assure you there is plenty of Directv bashing and fawning over there, too. dbstalk is better for the information side of Directv, and satelliteguys leans toward a big town meeting format where discussions tend to wander, sometimes by design! Both serve their purpose quite well, IMHO.
     
  3. Jun 20, 2010 #23 of 162
    hasan

    hasan Well-Known Member

    5,957
    54
    Sep 22, 2006
    Ogden, IA
    Perverse logic, if I ever have seen it. Lying requires intent to deceive, not merely ignorance, incompetence or carelessness.

    If one doesn't know for a fact that the CSR (and by association, D*), intended to misinform, deceive or misrepresent, then they weren't "lying". So let's stop using the word "lie".

    They definitely screwed up. That's a fact. It's fixable, that's also a fact. The rest (i.e., alleged lying) is hyperbolic hand-waving/ hand-wringing.

    Anyone having dealt with D* CSRs has learned about their capabilities, read as: all over the map. Where do you think the term CSR roulette came from? It's lamentable, it's unfortunate, but it is what it has been and most likely will be. How's that for existential vaporware?:)

    In short, lying has nothing to do with it, and is just an angry way of expressing frustration, hopefully leading to some sort of favorable resolution of the problem. ...and it rarely works.
     
  4. Jun 20, 2010 #24 of 162
    David MacLeod

    David MacLeod New Member

    5,689
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    I gotta admit I think there is some deliberate lying lately. they get paid to make the sale and I think many do know what they offer is not correct. and since the installer on scene is the person who has to deal with it there are not enough repercussions to make the practice monetarily disadvantageous to the csr.
     
  5. Jun 20, 2010 #25 of 162
    csterno

    csterno New Member

    8
    0
    Jun 3, 2010
    Something similar happened to me. The CSR who took the order said I was eligible for FREE receiver upgrades when I signed up for MRV (I had 2 HD dvrs that would work and 2 SD receivers that needed to be upgraded). I confirmed with the CSR that when it was done I would be able to watch my DVR content on all 4 receivers, Yes was the answer. When the installer came he said that he had new receivers to replace the SD receivers but they weren't HD, so they wouldn't work with the MRV. Basically the two DVR's could see each other but that was it. Once they come out they can't change the equipment order and he said it happens all the time because the CSR's don't really know what equipment is needed to make it all work. The installer told me to call in and they should take care of the problem though they will ask you to pay for the receivers. He said be persistent and it should be ok.

    I called in and got transferred to someone who said that they were sorry but it would be $99 for a HD receiver. I said no way, the CSR said that MRV would be working on all tv's when the installer left. Who went and checked and said that I was eligible for a free HD receiver. I said that's great but I need 2. He said he couldn't do that but was able to use a loophole with the premium channels so essentially I got the second HD receiver for $24 plus shipping ($20). So I ended up with 2 H24's for $44.

    I don't think the original CSR was intentionally lying, I just don't think they totally know what's required. Probably the same in this situation.
     
  6. Jun 20, 2010 #26 of 162
    hasan

    hasan Well-Known Member

    5,957
    54
    Sep 22, 2006
    Ogden, IA
    "thinking" someone may be lying and blatantly smearing their character in public by accusing them of same, are two different things. Discretion is the better part of valor, even though some of the drama is lost.:)

    It is always better to assume the most charitable of explanations for "misinformation", when confronted with these kinds of problems. It certainly lowers one's blood pressure.:)

    I can't tell you the number of times I have been faced with retail electronics sales people who say the most absurd things when trying to explain something (be it policy or how a device works), because they feel they are on the spot, or because they just don't know any better and that is how they have operated throughout their lives. They just blurt out the first thing that comes to mind, because that's what they have always done, or to escape the discomfort of not knowing what the hell they are doing. They are not lying, they are escaping or merely on auto-pilot. They don't even have the immediate awareness to evaluate whether what they are saying is accurate or not, they are just hasty, or want out of an uncomfortable situation.

    They aren't lying most of the time, rather, they are either clueless or actually desperate!

    The relationships are not reciprocal. Most misinformation is not lying, while all lying is misinformation. It's all about intent, which is very difficult to discern, and the evil of which one should reserve for the most egregious of situations. One should not just plop out there this accusation for every mistake that underpaid, under qualified regular joes and janes lost in the sea of a technology driven retail business, make.
     
  7. Jun 20, 2010 #27 of 162
    joed32

    joed32 Hall Of Fame

    2,763
    29
    Jul 27, 2006
    It's only 2 months away and then you can find a provider that you like. Life's too short to be unhappy. I would probably pay the $40 and leave now if I was that unhappy.
    I tried to get MRV installed twice and they brought the wrong equipment so I canceled the installation. Not a big deal to me though.
     
  8. Jun 20, 2010 #28 of 162
    David MacLeod

    David MacLeod New Member

    5,689
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    not knowing and making something up to cover lack of knowledge is lying.
     
  9. Jun 20, 2010 #29 of 162
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Those that don't go the extra mile often end up bitter in many circumstances. In a perfect world this would not be a problem, but we don't live in a perfect world. I'm sure that every TV provider will irritate folks that just take what is dished out. This also carries over to retail and other service industries.

    It's a rare find these days to get a company that meets the full goal of your statement here. And don't forget, there are also customers who do their best to take advantage of a situation and often lie themselves .. so in some cases, not being customer oriented is the right choice. The latter of course is not a large percentage, as I believe most people try to be honest .. but it does happen.

    So, speaking generally about DIRECTV, I think that they do (overall) a good job. But I, too, have to take the initiative at times to make things happen in a way that I find satisfactory. This, to me, is not a problem. Just part of doing business with any company.
     
  10. Jun 20, 2010 #30 of 162
    billsharpe

    billsharpe Hall Of Fame

    3,190
    155
    Jan 25, 2007
    Southern...
    I've talked to a couple CSR's who were absolutely clueless about Sonic Tap channels, but most of my CSR experiences have been rewarding. A calm voice and the use of "please" once in a while helps.

    What really surprised me was one CSR saying "I don't know" in response to my question and then offering to put me on hold briefly while she looked for the answer. She found it, answered me, and all was well. :D

    I tried to call last week about a billing problem and couldn't reach a CSR for over 20 minutes. I gave up and sent a message through the web site "contact us" address. I was pleasantly surprised to get a good answer back in less than two hours.
     
  11. Jun 20, 2010 #31 of 162
    xmetalx

    xmetalx Godfather

    289
    0
    Jun 3, 2009

    Erm, CSR's do NOT get any kind of incentive or bonus for simply ordering equipment upgrades..
     
  12. Jun 20, 2010 #32 of 162
    Barcthespark

    Barcthespark Godfather

    426
    11
    Dec 16, 2007
    It doesn't really matter if it is lying or incompetency, because the end result is the same; the customer gets put through the ringer.
     
  13. Jun 20, 2010 #33 of 162
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    prove that they made something up to cover lack of knowledge, misinformation is not making something up.

    Sorry CSR posts are hillarious, you only see what the poster wants you to see and it is slated in such a way that it makes the poster look as if they are the injuried party no matter what actually happened.

    My business has a contract to cover CS support for a couple of online games, would love to be allowed to post the actual transcript or recording of a csr call in the thread that the player posted their version of it to show the truth of what actually happened, alas we cannot do that, but we do have a lovely time rolling on the floor laughing at the claims
     
  14. Jun 20, 2010 #34 of 162
    bixler

    bixler Hall Of Fame

    1,283
    6
    Oct 14, 2008
    PA
    LOL...Everytime I see the word LIE in this forum I have to wonder if the poster missed that day of English class when the definition was learned.

    I doubt the CSR knew she wasn't telling you truth. It was a mistake, not a LIE.
     
  15. Jun 20, 2010 #35 of 162
    bixler

    bixler Hall Of Fame

    1,283
    6
    Oct 14, 2008
    PA
    What? A lie is when a KNOWN untruth is expressed as truth. If you lack knowledge in something how can you lie about it?? How would you know what you were saying wasn't the truth if you didn't have knowledge in the subject?
     
  16. Jun 20, 2010 #36 of 162
    David MacLeod

    David MacLeod New Member

    5,689
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    guys are friggin unbelievable.
    the authority figure for a customer is the csr, so what they say is supposed to be the truth from a customer standpoint.
    if they don't know and make something up to cover the lack of knowledge in order to placate the customer its lying.
    a lie of omission is still a lie.
    a lie due to stupidity is still a lie.
    a lie due to ineptitude is still a lie.
    a lie due to ego is a lie also and in these cases causes ripples on down the chain.
     
  17. Jun 20, 2010 #37 of 162
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    ...so basically everything is a lie in your book. Got it. :rolleyes: What may pass for a lie in your eyes, may not always be what a lie actually is.

    It was a mistake, plain and simple. A simple mistake which can be easily resolved. Let's hope cooler heads prevail in this case. Rhetoric and hyperbole are often unnecessary.
     
  18. Jun 20, 2010 #38 of 162
    hasan

    hasan Well-Known Member

    5,957
    54
    Sep 22, 2006
    Ogden, IA
    All, except perhaps one of those definitions are patently false, unless they include the element of intention to deceive (which covering to placate, might). A lie must include an intention to deceive, and using your definitions in public could well produce an unfortunate run-in with the legal system.

    You, of course, are free to believe whatever you like, but the legal requirement for something to be a "lie" is the element of intent. You may not like the definition, but that's what it is....and calling people liars, unnecessarily, is not flattering to anyone.

    Everything said about the untoward results of misinformation is absolutely true. I don't dispute that at all. I do object to smearing someone's character whimsically, and publicly when it is neither necessary nor accurate.
     
  19. Jun 20, 2010 #39 of 162
    cfkane

    cfkane AllStar

    65
    1
    Mar 14, 2010
    I do not think the CSR lied. It was a mistake. I do think that D* should give the guy exactly what he was promised by the CSR. If you order a steak at an eatery and it is not right, most places comp your meal. D* should take the loss on this because it is what the CSR promised assuming that what the OP stated is what happened.
     
  20. Jun 20, 2010 #40 of 162
    Satelliteracer

    Satelliteracer Hall Of Fame

    3,042
    38
    Dec 6, 2006

    Amen.


    I have been on the floor with these people and it is a TOUGH TOUGH TOUGH job. I'm not making excuses, just telling you like it is. Certainly D* (or E* or any other company) expects these folks to be at the top of their game. An agent can handle hundreds of calls in a day and not have any one be the same because the scenarios are so different. Now, certainly most calls fit into a similar "genre" but not always.


    Think about what a CSR has to be able to grasp

    Billing
    Technical (SD, HD, hardware questions, broadband questions)
    Programming
    Sports blackouts (having been in the sports business for over a decade, this at times even stumps the experts)
    Scheduling installs
    Suspends, late payments, customers moving, hardware upgrades, programming upgrades and downgrades

    Etc, etc.

    I tip my hat to these people. A very difficult job. It's unfortunate the thread starter felt he was lied to. More than likely a mistake was made.
     

Share This Page

spam firewall

Advertisements