1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.


Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by sdicomp, Sep 11, 2012.

  1. mreposter

    mreposter Hall Of Fame

    Jul 29, 2006
    I lot can change in 12 years. I'm not endorsing Time Warner, but to judge companies in this business in what things were like more than a decade ago isn't really fair.
  2. bidger

    bidger Hall Of Fame

    Nov 19, 2005

    I switched from TWC in 1998 and I didn't have any "warm and fuzzy" when I departed. The TWC installer knocked on my door in 2006 pitching triple play and I asked if he could return the following week after I'd researched their HD lineup. No CBS or FOX in HD cinched that choice. In 2009 a TWC tech knocked on my door to let me know they'd upgraded the wiring in my neighborhood, something that there's a snowball's chance in the Bahamas of Verizon doing w/ DSL. After Verizon p*ssed me off one last time in early 2010, I ordered Roadrunner online. Until some company deploys FTTH in my area, I can't see myself switching.

    In 1998 I saw TWC as the villain. More than twenty years later I see Verizon in that role. DirecTV...I still feel is a good choice for TV service. I'm just a little tired of the two year commitment at the drop of a hat. You've already recouped your investment in me. Any new equipment I might receive isn't owned anyway. And as I was typing this post I got a call from the Retention. I let them know if I come back I want the HR34. Don't expect it free, so the $99 charge was OK, but they couldn't guarantee my Lifetime DVR service would be reinstated. Appreciate the honestly, but I ended the call right there. Commitment was not brought up, but I'd want that in writing if I'm told there is none.
  3. Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    Sep 16, 2006
    Quote from the DirecTv customer service agreement:
  4. sdicomp

    sdicomp Godfather

    Sep 12, 2006
    It is funny how their offers change! I had to call and cancel service for them to find the 'free hd for 2 years' that the post card I received back in June 'promised'. While I was still their customer, I was told that DirecTV no longer offered free HD, and I 'shouldn't have received the post card'.

    No commitment from Charter here, and since my price is locked for 2 years in writing, I will be sending them my money as well. Their internet service is first rate!!
  5. Griffs77

    Griffs77 New Member

    Sep 21, 2012
    Got to go with what's right for you!

    I moved to D* last fall from TWC and locked in free HD for life at the time.

    TWC picture quality is CRAP, the HD was pixelated, and the feed would freeze or gray out several times a DAY. After several different boxes, I finally got a TWC rep to admit that the picture quality was never going to improve any time soon because there are hundreds of homes on my line and we all share bandwidth for phone, TV and internet, and the compression software could not overcome that limitation. She actually wished me well with D* as she knew the HD picture quality was going to be much better, and it is.

    I keep road runner for internet only, and HD picture quality is WAY more important to me than price (I don't need much anyway, no premium channels for movies or sports).

    No Fios (we have crappy Frontier phone not Verizon), so unless TWC went to all fiber optic or Verizon buys out Frontier and builds out Fios, I will be with D* for as long as they keep the satellites beaming.
  6. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    May 30, 2007
    Pretty safe to say Verizon won't buy Frontier :)
  7. marker101

    marker101 Legend

    Nov 6, 2007
    If i jumped to cable locally, I'd get a whopping 40 HD channels, including the networks for about $80 a month + $10 per receiver fees. In my case, I'll stick to DirecTV.
  8. bidger

    bidger Hall Of Fame

    Nov 19, 2005
    Don't know if you're in an area where SDV wasn't deployed, but I'm in one where it is. I compared the two systems side-by-side when I still had DirecTV active and TW fared pretty well. And now that the NFL Network is on TWC all the pieces are in place as far as I'm concerned. I've been a critic of TWC in the past, but it's pretty clear to me they've got their game face on.
  9. mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    Jan 30, 2007
    Yep. SDV has solved most of the PQ and bandwidth issues cable has had in the past. All I've seen looks as good or better than DirecTV, especially if you consider SD as well. I wouldn't touch cable a few years ago, but things have changed a lot recently, making them an excellent alternative to satellite in many areas.

    I'm very happy with the media center system I have. I have a 4 tuner cable card device in a cheap PC and an Xbox (or other extender) at every TV to watch live TV or recordings. The DVR interface is beautiful, recording space is virtually unlimited, I can easily transfer anything to DVD or BD and access all my other media, and remote viewing of all my content and live tv, all for a grand total of $2/month in equipment fees. Plus I have more HD and better SD than I had with DirecTV or Dish.
  10. RACJ2

    RACJ2 Hall Of Fame

    Aug 2, 2008
    That's a big turnaround for Charter. My father-in-law had them years ago and they were the pits.
  11. harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    What has cured the PQ and bandwidth problems is replacing most of the analog channels with digital versions.

    I'm not convinced that TWC isn't mostly fiber. Fiber is overrated if you use it with QAM as FIOS does.

Share This Page