How many of you with Directv think Dish is getting better than Directv

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by mkdtv21, Feb 24, 2012.

  1. veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    Dec 9, 2006
    They have. There was a upgrade push in the beginning for the service.
    The upgrade price has increased since.
  2. gslater

    gslater Gone to the Dogs

    Aug 5, 2007
    I'm not surprised the price has changed but what I was getting at is that they had absolutely no problem upgrading me to supported when I was already setup as unsupported. Maybe the difference is that they were more aware of the supported vs. unsupported mode at that time. After all they had been getting calls from DBSTalk members to get setup in unsupported mode then. I doubt they get those calls anymore.
  3. DJSGP

    DJSGP Cool Member

    Jun 25, 2007

    Happy the free HR34 made you happy.
    D is undoubtedly happy to have such a happy customer and the forum a post happy contributor.
    I like DTV - been a customer since October 1994. (the first week it was available nationally). The 198 months as a customer served as the basis of MHO- not the number of postings.

    Thanks for double checking the old post. btw - it was a suggestion, not a question - something worth noting in the future if you're open to a suggestion. And having the mix channels which is a cool concept still should be in HD.
  4. PrinceLH

    PrinceLH New Member

    Feb 18, 2003
    All I have to say is:

    Walking Dead
    Hell On Wheels
    Breaking Bad

    End of discussion!
  5. RACJ2

    RACJ2 Hall Of Fame

    Aug 2, 2008
    OK, I was exaggerating, it only took you 4 months to reply. I had to go back and read everything again, since I couldn't even recall what your post was about. Glad you have been a customer since day one, but if I wasn't "feeling the love", I would have switched a long time ago. And I do agree with you about the mix channel in HD. Although I didn't think the Hughs DVR was HD? ;)
  6. ccrowe3

    ccrowe3 Cool Member

    Jun 24, 2010
    I tried out a Hopper/Joey system and put my DirecTV account on suspension for a few months. I was not impressed. People in my house were fighting over tuners. To even have tv service for my daughters we had to give them a Joey (because Dish doesn't allow any other receivers in a Hopper installation), which was constantly telling the Hopper to record something. There was no way to disable the ability to record from the individual Joey either. With DirecTV I can just disable their networking and lock down certain ratings and channels so I can trust them with a remote.

    Dish also seems to have very inconsistent quality. A couple of channels will look very good and then you'll watch a different channel and notice that it looks worse than anything HD ever looked on DirecTV. Then there are the part time sports channels that I grew to hate. Blockbuster is OK, but it is in no way a serious competitor to the Netflix subscription I have. Nothing was really gained there for me. Things are much better now that I'm back with DirecTV full time. The picture quality is better, the channel selection suits my needs better, and my 2TB eSATA drive makes the user partition on the Hopper look not so big... And, um, Sunday Ticket. :D But Dish might be someone's cup of tea. I just know that it isn't mine. At all...
  7. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator

    Apr 17, 2003
    Preventing recording would be a interesting feature. It would help for those who are replacing receivers with Joeys and not wanting record features.

    You can set channel locks and ratings locks on a per Joey basis. My wife's Joey has different channels locked out than my Hopper.

    As far as the tuner limitations the discussions in the DISH forum recommend two hoppers in a setup. Many DBSTalk members have gone that way - although the lease upgrade for a second hopper makes it expensive.

    Also, unannounced yet working for the past few months, Joeys can be connected to the Hopper via Ethernet --- no cable required. We even have at least one member who is using a USB Wi-Fi adapter on his Joey. While not "official" this is a good way of avoiding running RG-6 to a viewing location.
  8. rmmccann

    rmmccann AllStar

    Apr 16, 2012
    ND, USA
    I don't think Dish is better than Directv, but I think better definitely varies from person to person with their needs.

    The equipment for Dish definitely seems *neat*, however with Directv the HR34 is the same kind of beast and once the C31s become more common it's going to be a very similar system to what Dish offers with the Hopper/Joey combo.

    Personally, Dish's programming doesn't suit my needs. They may offer my HD LiLs in HD, but I watch a lot of premiums and other content that is either not available in HD on Dish, or simply not available at all.
  9. mnassour

    mnassour Icon

    Apr 23, 2002
    Since DirecTV has suddenly started getting it's HD act together (i.e., long-awaited channels appearing) and is finally pulling in some European programming (channel 259) I've given up the thought of even considering Dish. Unless you're 1) demanding international language programming or 2) simply hate sports, there's no reason at all to consider the company....especially given the way it digs in its heels when it comes to renegotiating contracts for channels.
  10. RAD

    RAD Well-Known Member

    Aug 5, 2002
    So you think Dish doesn't "dig their heels in" on contracts? Ask the folks that weren't happy that they lost a few Disney HD channels, AMC and the other Dolan channels, Nat Geo HD, Big Ten Network, etc. vs DIRECTV which IIRC has only dropped G4. IMHO I'd rather have a company that tries to keep existing channels avilable vs. one that drops existing channels and doesn't appear to be working to bring them back.
  11. mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    Jan 30, 2007
    When this thread started a few months ago, Dish was in the lead IMO, with more basic HD, the new Hopper and Auto-Hop. DirecTV was way behind in terms of basic HD. Fast forward to now, Dish has dropped several channels and gotten sued over auto-hop. And DirecTV has hung on to those same channels and added several more. So they've pulled ahead at the moment. Of course each consistently has advantages over the other (DirecTV sports content for example).

    In the mean time I dropped them both and am watching this from the side lines. It will be interesting to see who's ahead a few years from now when I go shopping for a provider again. I think long term, Dish has a lot more liabilities and belligerent management that's going to have a negative impact over all.
  12. mark40511

    mark40511 Legend

    Jul 18, 2008
    Lexington KY
    Regarding Dish VS Directv (SD), not HD -

    I used to have Dish for two years or so before switching to Directv for about three or four years now, and the first thing I noticed is that Directv's SD channels looked better than those on Dish, not that I LOVE watching SD channels, but I did notice this. I'm only bringing this up because someone earlier in the thread (first page I think) had said the opposite! I disagree. Maybe I'm crazy!
  13. mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    Jan 30, 2007
    Hmm... I'm with the earlier poster. I found Dish SD much better than DirecTV. In my experience DirecTV has the worst SD I've ever seen. That includes cable, youtube and kinetoscope. Maybe there was a problem with your particular receiver.
  14. lparsons21

    lparsons21 Hall Of Fame

    Mar 4, 2006
    Herrin, IL
    I'd agree that Dish's SD is better on the western arc, and much better on the eastern arc.

    I've had both, have DirecTV now and actively avoid watching anything in SD with D*! Of course, sometimes I have to force myself 'cause something in SD will just grab my attention, but it doesn't happen often nor with regularity. :lol:
  15. fleckrj

    fleckrj Icon

    Sep 4, 2009
    Cary, NC
    I have not seen Dish SD lately, but DirecTV's SD is nowhere near what it used to be. When I first got DirecTV in 1999, no one had HD. DirecTV's SD picture was as good as DVD, slightly better than Dish, and far better than TWC. Since HD was rolled out and more and more SD channels were added, the SD picture quality on DirecTV has taken a nose dive. There are a few channels on DirecTV where the picture quality is decent, but most of them are worse than VHS.

    That said, there are only two channels that I watch on DirecTV that are not in HD. Dish does not have one of those in HD, either, and my local TWC does not have one of those in SD or HD. Many channels I watch are not available on Dish, so for me, DirecTV is the only choice.
  16. rapidturtle

    rapidturtle Cool Member

    Jan 7, 2012
    I just came over from Dish last month, and as of now am a very happy D* customer. It just seems to me that Dish is always loosing a channel, and they tend to not get quite a few of them back. I am in the NY area, and they got rid of all of the NY RSN's while I was with them, with no reduction in my bill. The way they are treating the whole AMC deal was the final straw for me. We the customers are being used as pawns in their lawsuit, so I decided to switch then.
  17. mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    Jan 30, 2007
    Dropping AMC was the final straw for me too. But DirecTV is still missing too much content, so I had no choice but to go back to cable (my son loves G4, one of the few channels DirecTV has ever dropped entirely). I'm happy to see all the HD DirecTV has been adding lately, while Dish continues to drop channels.
  18. tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    A bit of a side track on SD. Directv's SD is generally poor. It is limited for bandwidth. However, the way to make some of it watchable for me is to use native, allow 480i and set the view to original format. That eliminates any scaling at all by the receiver, which does it very poorly. I've seen a big improvement when doing that. Still not good (and compared to fios, which I have, it is much worse) but for some watching, not revolting.
  19. fleckrj

    fleckrj Icon

    Sep 4, 2009
    Cary, NC
    I cannot compare to Fios, but I have had the same experience with my Panasonic TVs. For my TVs, scaling by the TV is better than scaling by the receiver; however, this is all dependant on the TV model. High end TVs generally do a better job of scaling than the DirecTV receiver does, but many entry-level HD TVs are even worse than the DirecTV receiver at scaling. In those situations, turning native off and only passing 1080i is better. Everyone needs to try it both ways with their equipment, and then decide what is best for them.
  20. RAD

    RAD Well-Known Member

    Aug 5, 2002

Share This Page

spam firewall