HR24 discussion outside of this forum

Discussion in 'DIRECTV - H24/HR24 Field Trial (private)' started by Doug Brott, Dec 17, 2009.

  1. Feb 6, 2010 #221 of 229
    smiddy

    smiddy Tain't ogre til its ogre

    15,654
    122
    Apr 5, 2006
    I know which thread, I was being sarcastic, sorry I thought that wsa obvious, seeing as I'm a post whore and would post in any thread, even if I had no idea what to post, but Doug was very explicit in his memo to us, "Do Not Post in That Thread!" so I understood that to mean, forget about it, so I did. Others aren't as astute it seems and find it more appealing to keep the troll-abilities of those others alive and kicking by feeding them. I will continue ot ignore it until we get permission or we finish this trial, which ever comes first. I'm thinking this trial will last another six weeks at a minimum, too much to continue testing, that hasn't made it into the Hx24 boxes from tehlegacy boxes...IMHO. ;)
     
  2. Feb 6, 2010 #222 of 229
    dave29

    dave29 New Member

    5,945
    40
    Feb 18, 2007
    I haven't even opened that thread (due to the title), now I'm curious to see who (from here) is posting in there.
     
  3. Feb 6, 2010 #223 of 229
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Battlescott and a few others made comments that included references to the HR24, mostly speculative, althought Battlescott's was almost matter of fact regarding a few HR24 details - that was allowed to stay as posted in this public forum.

    I agree that this is a good converstation to avoid...but...

    When this is allowed to be posted in a non-CE thread in the very first post to start with...it opens up pandora's box on speculation....heck...the biggest two posters in that thread are cartivision and harsh for some time now....but to Doug's point....its a dangerous place to be.

    At first this post ticked me off - and I know this guy and he means well and is excited about anything new....anything...but then after re-reading the first post - his comment was just based on the original post, of which the first statement is listed below.
     
  4. Feb 6, 2010 #224 of 229
    Sixto

    Sixto Well-Known Member

    12,224
    95
    Nov 18, 2005
    Yep, been interesting to read those off-limits threads.
     
  5. Feb 6, 2010 #225 of 229
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,050
    312
    Jan 4, 2006
    Good reading, yes. But I'm obeying orders and not posting, even if it is just "speculation". :)
     
  6. Feb 6, 2010 #226 of 229
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,050
    312
    Jan 4, 2006
    If Battlescott jumped off.... well you know how that goes. :D
     
  7. Feb 6, 2010 #227 of 229
    azarby

    azarby Hall Of Fame

    4,133
    19
    Dec 15, 2006
    Like my wife says, " you can look but don't touch"
    :)

    Bob
     
  8. Feb 6, 2010 #228 of 229
    Sixto

    Sixto Well-Known Member

    12,224
    95
    Nov 18, 2005
    Exactly.
     
  9. Feb 6, 2010 #229 of 229
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,740
    361
    Dec 9, 2006
    So you're saying she's "liberal" are you? :lol:
     

Share This Page

spam firewall