1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is it just me, or does D* want it both ways?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by gsanders1, Dec 30, 2009.

  1. darman

    darman AllStar

    78
    0
    Sep 24, 2007
    Literally?
     
  2. DogLover

    DogLover Hall Of Fame

    2,510
    0
    Mar 18, 2007
    Actually, in many markets cell phone rates have been going down, and have been for some time. So, keeping you at the same rate might actually be a benefit for them, rather than a benefit for you.
     
  3. smiddy

    smiddy Tain't ogre til its ogre

    15,654
    121
    Apr 5, 2006
    You can also include the value of service for the price has increased. At least in my area, Mrs. Smiddy and I had just phone service for $65.oo for the two phones. In November we purchased a Palm Pre for each of us, now we get full internet access and unlimited texting and a better interface $76.oo, so we pay $11.oo more, but we have better service and use it more now, very much well worth it (in case anyone is wondering, I get discounts from my company, so these are not retail plans; though the value is very similar in scope).
     
  4. bobcamp1

    bobcamp1 Icon

    896
    1
    Nov 8, 2007
    Many people will argue that it's not a competitive market at all. It's imperfect competition at best. You're thinking of the high barrier to market entry. But that's not the point.

    I bet they get the vast majority of that money back. Yes, they operate in the red for a couple of years, but they aren't bleeding money. And neither is D*. In fact, they are very profitable, most likely due to all the extra fees they charge.
     
  5. hilmar2k

    hilmar2k Hall Of Fame

    5,251
    4
    Mar 18, 2007
    Yes, literally.

    [​IMG]

    For me, anything but an HR-2x is free, and the HR-2x is $99.
     
  6. Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears

    6,081
    46
    Mar 18, 2008
    Not sure what you consider a comepetitive market but I can tell you that tv choice is. If it wasn't they wouldn't spend so much all the time and give specials/promotions to keep customers. They wouldn't need to.

    I said they would eventually get that money back already. I also never stated that DirecTV wasn't profitable now. They operated in the red for many years which is true. The fees haven't really changed it's the number of people paying them that has.
     
  7. elbman

    elbman New Member

    5
    0
    Jan 13, 2009
    The point is they force arbitration (as do many companies) since in court of law, the first item that would be requested is the signed contract as executed; which they obviously don't have. Therefore the "Contract" is garbage, ask a number of lenders attempting to forclose which can't provide copies of loan documents. It's very difficult to file a monetary claim in court against another party if you can't produce a physical copy of an executed agreement.
     

Share This Page